Jump to content

Recommended Posts

What's wrong with this plane? You can find the answer on my blog. Or if you just want to see some fancy pictures, scroll a bit lower to some of the shots I took during campaign testing.

 

NAW_10B_01.jpg

 

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

 

AS Mission in a RCAF F/A-18

 

wip01.jpg

 

A pair of F-18's en route to the target.

 

wip02.jpg

 

A typical CAS load: mavericks and dumb bombs.

 

wip03.jpg

 

The office

 

wip04.jpg

 

Rifle

 

wip05.jpg

 

Unfriendly neighbourhood.

 

wip06.jpg

 

Pressing on

 

wip07.jpg

 

Last thoughts?

 

wip08.jpg

 

Kaboom

 

wip09.jpg

 

Guns, guns, guns.

 

wip10.jpg

 

Mudmoving

 

wip11.jpg

 

Unexpected guest

 

wip12.jpg

 

showing the unexpected guest the door

 

wip13.jpg

 

Friendlies at the party

 

wip14.jpg

 

Going home

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice pics (and intresting blog!)...

 

...but one little comment (to WOU:BC Update 1):

The german navy in not called "Kriegsmarine" (at least not since WWII...)!

The correct name would be "Marine" (Marine = navy, Krieg = war - so you can guess what "Kriegsmarine" means - i don't think our neighbours would be very pleased with it... :biggrin: ).

 

edit: 1955-1989 it was sometimes called "Bundesmarine" (informal)...

Edited by Shaolin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Sony Tuckson

some comments to improve "realism" a bit

 

Only small details, nothing to really worry about but hell, why not?

 

If think that hornets equipped for CAS wouldn't be loaded with AIM-7...they would preferably load some nav/weapons aiming pods

 

Second very disturbing detail (for me as I was on base during that campaign period ;-) ); any air to air duty for a belgian F-16 would have been assigned to a 1 wing (349 or 350 sqn) block 10 bird

 

Kleine brogel's 10 Wing was only trained for mud moving missions back then.

 

And althoug it's not often the case, the 6 sidewinder config exists and does from time to time show...but in 1989, no AIM-9L for Belgium, only P and N

Edited by Sony Tuckson

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
some comments to improve "realism" a bit

 

Only small details, nothing to really worry about but hell, why not?

 

If think that hornets equipped for CAS wouldn't be loaded with AIM-7...they would preferably load some nav/weapons aiming pods

 

Second very disturbing detail (for me as I was on base during that campaign period ;-) ); any air to air duty for a belgian F-16 would have been assigned to a 1 wing (349 or 350 sqn) block 10 bird

 

Kleine brogel's 10 Wing was only trained for mud moving missions back then.

 

And althoug it's not often the case, the 6 sidewinder config exists and does from time to time show...but in 1989, no AIM-9L for Belgium, only P and N

 

thanks for the feedback :good:

 

That's exactly the kind of response I expect and need. I know something about aircraft, but I lack the day to day useage knowledge. With this kind of feedback I can edit the campaign to reflect reality as much as possible.

 

Any suggestion is more then welcome :salute:

Edited by KingAlbert

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Also the NAW A-10 was going to be used for Fast FAC and CAS. So its quite at home in the FAC role...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Sony Tuckson

Als ik u kan helpen....

 

ik was luchtverkeersleiderin 1989, te Beauvechain, dus ik heb tamelijk goed kennis van eenheden van toen

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Sony Tuckson

a badge proudly worn by pilots by then

 

the sister squadron was 350, with red as main colour

 

see how double meant the "no reds in belgian blue" was ;-)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice blog, KingAlbert! I see you also make Lomac movies. You should also consider making a movie from your WOE campaign. It takes some tweeking, but you can disable all screen info and messages to have a clean look, as you obviously already did for your screenshots.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
a badge proudly worn by pilots by then

 

the sister squadron was 350, with red as main colour

 

see how double meant the "no reds in belgian blue" was ;-)

 

o/ i think it was reffering to "VVS"

btw, i like you SpitFalcon scheme xD i got a photo of it somewhere here....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Sony Tuckson

that's the big advantage

 

they put one "motto" having a double meaning

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..