Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Dave

B-1B Lancer AKA "The Bone"

Recommended Posts


No Not yet... if it had been im sure there would have been a few pics from me or Spectre showing Mach 1 low level bombing runs in ODS :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That would be nice, like to take it in the weeds and really see how it flies..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

thats the bit i cant wait for... id even do recon missions! :lol: Mach 1 in the weeds over a recon target.... Stuff high altitude.... ill get you closeups from about 30ft :lol::rofl:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The recon pic shows how many fillings some scared sucker has, then you are low enough!

 

:good:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
thats the bit i cant wait for... id even do recon missions! :lol: Mach 1 in the weeds over a recon target.... Stuff high altitude.... ill get you closeups from about 30ft :lol::rofl:

 

Hehe not these days.... no need to crash into a mountain when I can just dial in the zoom..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hehe not these days.... no need to crash into a mountain when I can just dial in the zoom..

 

 

That takes all the fun out of it.... besides i never crash :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
After watching this video of B1's in action over Iraq, makes me wonder what kind of munitions they were using, some of the explosions are huge!

 

A typical load that I saw were GBU-31 2000lb JDAMs. They make a nice big bang.

 

-S

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think you "plink" with 2000's, that's more a "whump." :biggrin:

 

That AMRAAM idea has been floating around for years, based I guess on the fact that the Bone and the F-16 radars share many components. I think one reason it never "flew" is that AMRAAMs aren't nearly long-range enough to keep the Bone out of harm's way should the enemies choose to pursue. Sure it's fast down low, but at altitude where you'd want to be launching them from it's just barely supersonic, and you don't want to be dogfighting in a Bone. :wink:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe with a scramjet type long range missile sort like the Meteor? Or here is a crazy idea, make it able to carry and launch Phoenixes! :yes:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Maybe with a scramjet type long range missile sort like the Meteor? Or here is a crazy idea, make it able to carry and launch Phoenixes! :yes:

 

 

The AIM-120D has almost the same effective range as the last generation of the AIM-54 (rumors are, 180 km), and something on the order of 3X the PK as the '54C. Its seeker head sports an LPI AESA radar. So, why use a 35 year old missile design that's not been upgraded since the late 80s/early 90s?

 

Also, the only thing preventing the B-1B from exceeding Mach 1.4, is its low-observable inlet design. It's within the realm of feasibility to modify the design in order to allow it to supercruise.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The AIM-120D has almost the same effective range as the last generation of the AIM-54 (rumors are, 180 km), and something on the order of 3X the PK as the '54C. Its seeker head sports an LPI AESA radar. So, why use a 35 year old missile design that's not been upgraded since the late 80s/early 90s?

 

Also, the only thing preventing the B-1B from exceeding Mach 1.4, is its low-observable inlet design. It's within the realm of feasibility to modify the design in order to allow it to supercruise.

 

just like the russia's R-77 M with Ramjet...just rummors....in maybe 200 or 500 years well see those flying

just promisses and promisses :good:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Really? I was under the impression it had much longer range than that. And that it was faster. Hey this wasn't about being realistic anyway but about being crazy. How do you think a phoenix would have performed if it had continued to be upgraded?

 

Looking at the AIM-120D my other suggestion of using Meteor looks like it would be uneccecary too. What is the max effective range of the Meteor anyway?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The AIM-120D has almost the same effective range as the last generation of the AIM-54 (rumors are, 180 km), and something on the order of 3X the PK as the '54C.

 

 

:shok: :shok:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Really? I was under the impression it had much longer range than that. And that it was faster. Hey this wasn't about being realistic anyway but about being crazy. How do you think a phoenix would have performed if it had continued to be upgraded?

 

Looking at the AIM-120D my other suggestion of using Meteor looks like it would be uneccecary too. What is the max effective range of the Meteor anyway?

 

Well, a Phoenix is much heavier to begin with, and that renders it at a marked disadvantage agility-wise, when it comparing to something the size and mass of an an AMRAAM. The '54 was designed to be a long-range bomber killer. The fact that "its faster", is again, a moot point against an agile target.

 

LPI radar in combination with GPS, means that at least in theory, that one can acquire ranging and position data on a target with a single sweep, secure the radar, and then launch a missile "dumb" at the target's projected flightpath. As the missile approaches its waypont, it lights off its radar, and acquires the target without any further guidance from its launch platform.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
LPI radar in combination with GPS, means that at least in theory, that one can acquire ranging and position data on a target with a single sweep, secure the radar, and then launch a missile "dumb" at the target's projected flightpath. As the missile approaches its waypont, it lights off its radar, and acquires the target without any further guidance from its launch platform.

 

Then when that fails, you go to guns!!!!!!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For some reason that comment made me picture a missile with a gun.. hey a rocket propelled radar guided gun pod.

 

..excuse me while I go make an appointment with my shrink.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It made me flash to guns on da bone!

 

Maybe quad Gau-8 ringing the cockpit, with closable doors to keep supersonic integrity?

 

Yeah, OK, I'll go munch my meds now... :biggrin:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
A typical load that I saw were GBU-31 2000lb JDAMs. They make a nice big bang.

 

-S

 

Yes they do :smile:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It made me flash to guns on da bone!

 

Maybe quad Gau-8 ringing the cockpit, with closable doors to keep supersonic integrity?

 

Yeah, OK, I'll go munch my meds now... :biggrin:

 

 

Or in a nod to both WW2 and Airwolf..... a retractable belly pack containing the aforementioned GAU-8 Avengers......

 

Just a thought :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Of course, there was no AIM-120D when the B-1R proposal first surfaced. I don't even know if the 120As were in service yet!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..