Ernst 0 Posted September 4, 2009 (edited) I don't have a very high end machine by todays standards any longer, but I am able to run Phase II at the max slider settings for all but for Terrain and Scenery Detail which are on 4. Do you think I would have a shot at this Phase III, or would it be best for me to wait until I get a more up to date computer? I don't want to attempt an install and not be happy, then mess up an absolutely perfect running Phase II. Edited September 4, 2009 by Ernst Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Check Six 2 Posted September 4, 2009 (edited) Ernst, Welcome to the OFF forum. I'm unable to help you as you haven't posted your computer specifications, and even if you did, I'm not all that savvy on graphic cards etc. What I can do is recommend you visit the overflandersfields site, click on the "requirements" page (or click on the link I posted for you below), and perhaps that will answer your question. http://www.overfland....com/sysreq.htm If you cannot work it out from there, please get back to us and post the specifications for your machine. There are many guys here that will understand and be able and willing to help. Edited September 4, 2009 by Check Six Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ernst 0 Posted September 4, 2009 (edited) Well, my system is above what is considered a Low End system in all but memory, but not by much. Windows XP AMD 3400+ 2.45 GHz 1.00 GB RAM Nvidia GeForce 6800GT - newest drivers Plenty of HD space Since it runs Phase II so flawlessly with very high and smooth frame rates, I was wondering how much more demanding is Phase III? I don't remember what the original recomendations to run Phase II were. If Phase III is anywhere as demanding as Rise of Flight, then I know for certain that my current machine is not nearly ready enough. Edited September 4, 2009 by Ernst Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BirdDogICT 3 Posted September 4, 2009 Well, my system is above what is considered a Low End system in all but memory, but not by much. Windows XP AMD 3400+ 2.45 GHz 1.00 GB RAM Nvidia GeForce 6800GT - newest drivers Plenty of HD space Since it runs Phase II so flawlessly with very high and smooth frame rates, I was wondering how much more demanding is Phase III? I don't remember what the original recomendations to run Phase II were. Generally speaking, if your sliders are on 4 for Phase II, they'll be on 2 (or maybe even 1) in Phase III. Phase III still looks great at those levels, even with AA and AF turned off. There is so much going on the Phase III world that it needs raw CPU power more than anything. I can't find Phase II system recommendations in the old FAQ, but I'm guessing that they would be about the same as CFS3: 128MB RAM, 400MHz Processor, 900 MB Hard Drive, 16 MB 3D video card. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ernst 0 Posted September 4, 2009 (edited) Generally speaking, if your sliders are on 4 for Phase II, they'll be on 2 (or maybe even 1) in Phase III. Phase III still looks great at those levels, even with AA and AF turned off. There is so much going on the Phase III world that it needs raw CPU power more than anything. This is pretty much what I was expecting. I will need a very good system to run Rise of Flight to its best, but I was hoping to get by with what I currently have to attempt phase III. I think it would be marginal for me to do that though. I can be happy with Phase II for now. Edited September 4, 2009 by Ernst Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ernst 0 Posted September 4, 2009 Well let's put it this way, can you finacially see your way clear to a NEW machine. Because That one, can be easily improved, ( but not running high settings ) I was planning to wait a while on getting a new computer. Actually, it is one of the last things I need right now. Since I will be holding on to this one for a while longer, what do you suggest would be my best path to improvement? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
+Polovski 414 Posted September 4, 2009 Just to correct something here, it's not specially true you need to lower your sliders by 2 for P3 - not sure where that came from. Maybe some people found that I don't know but it's not true for others for sure. There is better scenery but also better optimisation, especially as patches came for P3 too. So if you are sure you can run P2 very well indeed, then P3 should be fine. But are you sure you are on sliders 4 for terrain and scenery? That's usually only for higher end machines? Maybe you have no AA or Anisotropic filtering set or some other settings.. The system itself seems too low for that 1GB and a 6800GT? The only concern I'd say is 1GB of RAM is very low anyway. That might be a cheap upgrade to get a little more speed. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BirdDogICT 3 Posted September 5, 2009 Just to correct something here, it's not specially true you need to lower your sliders by 2 for P3 - not sure where that came from. Polovski, Thanks for the correction. I misquoted the Installation & Graphics FAQ, which states: Note sliders in OFF are +2 in quality over CFS3 sliders ("3" in OFF = "5" in CFS3!) so please don't choose too high settings. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ernst 0 Posted September 5, 2009 But are you sure you are on sliders 4 for terrain and scenery? That's usually only for higher end machines? Maybe you have no AA or Anisotropic filtering set or some other settings.. The system itself seems too low for that 1GB and a 6800GT? Yes, my sliders are on 4 for Terrain and Scenery Detail. They are set to 5 on the other three. The global settings for my 6800GT are: 4x Anisotropic filtering 2x AA Under the Adjustment for Image Quality tab I have it set for Balanced between Performance and Quality. Drivers: 190.62 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ernst 0 Posted September 6, 2009 What may I ask is your FPS . . . . 6 or 8 ? Because frankly, you're the first who has run that high a setting, with 1GB of memory, from that Slow a proccesor It runs extremely smooth. How can I check the FPS? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ernst 0 Posted September 6, 2009 The ( Z ) Command on Keyboard it's a toggle, it appears as a bright Red Jumble of numbers in the upper left of your screen Everybody has a smooth fluid motion, flying over farmland at 10,000 feet, with no other aircraft in sight The trick is maintaining that smoothness in a rather large, dogfight. Or over an airfield, or heaven forbid, a dogfight over an airfield. That's where a few Gigs of RAM are welcomed, and can help-out the overburdened slow CPU The words 'SLIDE SHOW' become more than just words In a blinding snow storm with three to four enemies the FPS average 25 close to the ground and 29 - 32 at my starting altitude of just a few thousand feet. Landing at a base after the fight averages 23. A fight directly over a friendly base at low altitude drops it down to 17, but even there the action is not jittery at all. A clearer summer sky raises everything up an average of 3 -5 FPS depending on the location and action. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sgran 0 Posted September 6, 2009 Well I have a very similar low spec machine, and I (Used to before I had to reinstall) Run OFF Phase 3 at 5 For aircraft and effects, 4 for clouds and 2 for scenery and terrain and get very good frame rates and still decent scenery, so you should do fine. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ernst 0 Posted September 6, 2009 Thanks everyone. I am going out of town for a few weeks and I will decide if I am to wait, or go ahead and give it a shot. My real concern was that I don't want to upset the good Phase II that I am running now and I read that I may need to first uninstall that one. I really do not want to do that just in case upon a needed reinstall it does not opearate the same. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
+Polovski 414 Posted September 10, 2009 P3 is miles ahead of P2 though that should be your driving force ;) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
