Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I tried a SU-22 from the SU-17/20/22 pack in the download section. The plane flies fine except it tilts (is this the right word ?) on the right side. I mean it yaws slow to the right in time and is rotating to the right slow in time. I looked into aircraft data.ini file but all the symetric parts data looked fine to me. Any idea what can cause such behavior ? Can that be corrected ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

loadout?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

loadout?

 

Loadout is symetrical , of course. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nothing serious :

 

Open the data.ini file

 

All the Ymac= entries on the right side must be +

 

RightWing Ymac=-0.90 and RightStab Ymac=-0.76 must be modified to :

 

[RightWing]

 

Ymac=0.90

 

[RightStab]

 

Ymac=0.76

It worked fine for me, hope it will for you ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nothing serious :

 

Open the data.ini file

 

All the Ymac= entries on the right side must be +

 

RightWing Ymac=-0.90 and RightStab Ymac=-0.76 must be modified to :

 

[RightWing]

 

Ymac=0.90

 

[RightStab]

 

Ymac=0.76

It worked fine for me, hope it will for you ;)

 

all values are + on right Wing and right stab and - (negative) for left wing and left stab, so no problem here.

The values are different from what you suggest but they are symetrical.

I discovered other things searching for the answer and I think these are the causes. The weapon station attachment points have different values (slightly but different) for LEFT and RIGHT. I couldn't suspect that from the very beginning of course. It would've been the last place I would search. First I didn't understand why were those small differences but in the end I got it. The plane (the model I have) have some ...asymetrical loadouts, some navigation pod and three other three special pylons. My guess is that who made it , it tuned it so fine to support all those original equipment. Truth is I didn't check his complex loadout scheme, I took his word for it. Instead I corrected slightly some values of the attachment points to obtain an equilibrium. Of course I didn't succeed 100% but I am satisfied with the results.

Thank you anyway for guding.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..