MigBuster 2,861 Posted October 17, 2011 Nice High res video 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
B52STRATO 215 Posted October 17, 2011 I have a question I'm often asked, but I never really find an answer to it ... why choose the AIM-120 on external hardpoints in place of the AIM-9 (or other IR devices) ? Not only in an attack configuration as shown in the video but also in the case of C.A.P, reconnaissance or interception mission. Anyone got a correct explanation ? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mdatelmi 124 Posted October 17, 2011 Take a look here... http://www.military-quotes.com/forum/f-16-question-t65605.html http://www.freefalcon.com/forum/archive/index.php/t-9854.html Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
B52STRATO 215 Posted October 17, 2011 Thank you for the links. It seems that this weapons setting has already led to many questions from the fans ... and some asses kicked ! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MigBuster 2,861 Posted October 17, 2011 (edited) I have a question I'm often asked, but I never really find an answer to it ... why choose the AIM-120 on external hardpoints in place of the AIM-9 (or other IR devices) ? Not only in an attack configuration as shown in the video but also in the case of C.A.P, reconnaissance or interception mission. Anyone got a correct explanation ? Pretty sure its about reducing wing flutter, although I would rather have an AIM-120 over an AIM-9 for self defence any day. See this site for answers http://www.f-16.net/f-16_forum_viewtopic-t-11355-view-next.html Anything with John Wills name in it is pretty good - being one of the original F-16 engineers!! Edited October 17, 2011 by MigBuster Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JediMaster 451 Posted October 18, 2011 That's also why the F-16 always has something there. Originally the wingtip launch rails were designed to be off when not needed. The flutter response was improved with them on, though, and IIRC they found it even better with the AIM-9s hanging there. The heavier 120s do an even better job, so you see 120s on the tips and 9s under the wings now, backwards from pretty much every other plane out there (that puts IRMs on the wingtips). That includes the only other US fighters using wingtip rails, the Hornets. Both legacy and Super types just have 9s on the tips. I don't know if they can carry 120s there or not. My guess is there's no structural reason they can't, but they may not be wired for it and the change in flutter response on the different wings may be undesirable. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MigBuster 2,861 Posted October 18, 2011 Think you might be right: I've worked with F-18A/B/C/D/E aircraft for over 17 years. There has not been a flight clearance for the AIM-120 on the wingtip stations. The F-18A-D will only fly with a LAU-7 launcher on the wingtips which will only accomidate varients of the AIM-9 missile. The F-18E/F has a LAU-127 launcher loaded on the wingtips. It can carry both AIM-9 and AIM-120 missiles. However, there is only flight clearance for the AIM-9 currently. Nothing in the works at present for the AIM-120. I agree, 120 loaded on wingtip will put enormous stress on the wingfold transmissions as well as the mounting hardware for the launcher itself. http://combatace.com/topic/48322-aim-120-on-hornet-wingtips/ Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
