Jump to content

Recommended Posts


That is Julhelms ATF projekt. PM him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I said that without moving my lips...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Man you know you should start to release your stuff... like the He-277, whata beauty :deadhorse:

 

more pics of the F-22B?

Edited by 76.IAP-Blackbird

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Believe it or not, that single tail was part of General Dynamics offical submission to the ATF program. So what you have there is 100% real design.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Uh ok, looks realy interesting I like your shadow cat and this design! Thanks for the hard work! But the vertail kills the RCS of this plane  :assassin:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Now do it drinking a glass of water

You owe me a new keyboard...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Uh ok, looks realy interesting I like your shadow cat and this design! Thanks for the hard work! But the vertail kills the RCS of this plane  :assassin:

Yeah it does, which is one of the reasons GD lost.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, but none of those would work because of weight and structural reasons which is why GD had to compromise with the vertical tail. If the concept had won, the single tail is what would have been flown. It's almost as if you people think I don't research my models or something.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think another point that made it lose it was that the distributed radar scheme (its nose section was too small for a radar of the power/range chosen, so the LERX were supposed to house secondary antennas to compensate, the wing pods apparently were supposed to house rearward facing antenna as well) was deemed a technological uncertainty and when added to compromised RCS except in select quadrants, it sealed the fate of GD's proposal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Julhelm, I am sorry, there must be a misunderstanding.

I am not putting to question how and why you choose which aircraft or which version (final or experimental) you would model - that is entirely up to you of course.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think another point that made it lose it was that the distributed radar scheme (its nose section was too small for a radar of the power/range chosen, so the LERX were supposed to house secondary antennas to compensate, the wing pods apparently were supposed to house rearward facing antenna as well) was deemed a technological uncertainty and when added to compromised RCS except in select quadrants, it sealed the fate of GD's proposal.

The other proposals from Lockheed, Northrop and Boeing all used 3 radar arrays with an IRST. GD's had 2 arrays in the LERX and an IRST in the nose. Amazingly GD scored 3rd place ahead of Boeing which had a much better design. Also Lockheed won with a design that was literally unflyable.

Edited by Julhelm

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like there is alot of work for Julhelm :biggrin: on this site, but that desing looks great!

 

Navalized F-22

navalisedf22.jpg

 

Hot version

atf11.jpg

 

:beach:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..