Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
33LIMA

Atlantic Fleet - the CombatAce review

Recommended Posts

Some more screenshots:

 

If you've played Silent Hunter 3, you'll remember stalking Barham in U-331. Well, this is the Atlanic Fleet version:

 

AtlanticFleet 2016-03-12 11-46-43-04.jpg

 

Some U-Boat action against the convoys:

 

AtlanticFleet 2016-03-12 11-09-49-11.jpg

 

AtlanticFleet 2016-03-12 11-34-32-22.jpg

 

Scharnhorst finds HMS Glorious, in the North Sea:

 

AtlanticFleet 2016-03-12 14-41-03-19.jpg

 

Adent and Acasta try to screen the carrier with smoke (which is still too effective, blocking a 'firing solution' even when there is still a line of sight) :

 

AtlanticFleet 2016-03-12 14-43-57-46.jpg

 

Stringbag -vs- Salmon and Gluckstein, after Glorious manages to launch a single strike, before a hit on her flight deck puts a sudden halt to flying operations:

 

AtlanticFleet 2016-03-12 14-48-29-52.jpg

 

But it all goes horribly Pete Tong:

 

AtlanticFleet 2016-03-12 14-45-24-59.jpg

 

I would really like the ability to engage a second taget with a secondary armament in the same firing turn, and I am wondering whether the turn-based firing system takes any account of different rates of fire between lighter and heavier guns. At any rate the overall effect is really something, and the turn-based gameplay means it isn't a click-fest, but provides time to think...which I need lots of!

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you shell land targets in the game like d-day/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think this is sea-battles only! Apart from the maps, I have not seen land yet, let alone shelled it! I have never tried to sail a damaged ship back to port after a battle, or tried to see if I could take Scharnhorst up to shell Spitzbergen (Operation Sicily)! Amphibious operations are not really a good fit with the Battle of the Atlantic, but I suppose they may feature in Pacific Fleet (PC) and Mediterranean Fleet, if we get them.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Meanwhile, I tried some destroyer action, taking Jersey and Juno out to check up on reports of German destroyers on a possible minelaying sortie off the North Sea coast.

 

The reports were correct. Two of those big enemy destroyers were indeed up to no good - Hans Lody and Erich Geise, as it was to turn out. We illuminated the enemy with starshell and set about seeing them off.

 

AtlanticFleet 2016-03-12 19-44-47-07.jpg

 

AtlanticFleet 2016-03-12 20-07-07-78.jpg

 

The action that developed was extremely satisfying. The bigger battles in Atlantic Fleet can become a bit of a handful to manage, unless you slow the pace down a tad and take your time to re-orient yourself, each time you move to a new ship - which is one reason it would be good to have the option to designate targets for the AI to engage. But two on two, or thereabouts, is just about perfect! The Huns jinked this way and that and with their heavier guns, traded round for round, starshell for starshell, and torpedo for torpedo. Atlantic Fleet is at its very best in this sort of engagement, everything from destrover-vs-destroyer, to battleship-v-battleship.

 

Juno was hit hard, but with the range winding down, she let go with a full salvo of torpedoes as the enemy raced past on a parallel track. Just when I thought I had missed - the AI in Atlantic Fleet seems to be reasonably good at spotting and 'combing' torpedo tracks - at least one tin fish ripped into Geise. She slowly lost way and began to go down by the bows. Jersey came hard about and headed straight for Lody at top speed, her fire becoming increasingly accurate as the range came down.

 

AtlanticFleet 2016-03-12 20-09-13-89.jpg

 

Head on, Jersey was a difficult target and though she took some hits, salvo after salvo from 'A' and 'B' turrets crashed into Lody.

 

AtlanticFleet 2016-03-12 20-11-17-77.jpg

 

By the time Lody had rolled over and begun to go down, both Juno and Geise had already slipped beneath the dark waves, and Jersey, while still under way and with all guns in action, was struggling to control fires in her superstructure. Britannia still ruled the waves, but a high price had been paid.

 

AtlanticFleet 2016-03-12 20-11-40-40.jpg

 

Brilliant! Simply brilliant!

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

33Lima, you did it again. First the Graviteam games and now you sold me on this one!

 

Have just started to learn the ropes but enjoying it already. The campaign sure looks like it will put many games to shame. Personally I am happy that the devs chose a turn-based format, I find that all too often "real-time" is really just a way of forcing the player to beat the game against the clock, leaving no opportunity for actual tactics/strategy or even enjoy the fancy graphics.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree Johan. Continuous gameplay is ideal, but not if it turns the game into a click-fest. Before I played Atlantic Fleet, I disliked the idea of its turn-based gameplay. Now I have been playing it, I'm appreciating that it has real benefits. And with the ability to turn off the on-screen aids - whose clever graphic design makes them quite unobtrusive, anyway - we can now enjoy the fancy graphics to the full.

 

AtlanticFleet 2016-03-12 19-37-44-34.jpg

 

AtlanticFleet 2016-03-10 22-08-36-89.jpg

 

AtlanticFleet 2016-03-12 15-26-56-27.jpg

 

One neat detail I appreciate is the fact that the gun directors and rangefinders rotate so as to train with the guns, rather than being fixed:

 

AtlanticFleet 2016-03-10 21-51-37-02.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good review.  I purchased the PC version today (I already have it on tablet).  It really needs a large screen to do it justice.  It is marvelous to behold............. and fun, intriguing to play.  The campaigns can be hard; trying to destroy ships, keeping your own ships and hoping that you gain enough points to add something decent to your squadron/fleet.

 

I actually like the turn-based play.  Too many ships doing stuff at the same time, and you're tearing your hair out, trying to cope.  I have Storm Eagle's Russo-Japanese War and Jutland.  Trying to monitor large fleets is very stressful.

 

For $10 it's a veritable steal.

 

And a Med version would the icing on the cake.

Edited by Hinchinbrooke

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

I have Storm Eagle's Russo-Japanese War and Jutland.  Trying to monitor large fleets is very stressful.

 

 

 

Exactly, have them and the people who complain about AF's UI seem to never have played those. Which is sad as those are titles with some potential but killed by insane decisions from start

Edited by Stary

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Turn-based gameplay is not too bad for modern ground combat, where - at least from the time that fire and movement drills came into general use - troops in or expecting contact would tend to move in 'tactical bounds', with halts in between, for fire, observation or new orders. As real warships don't 'go firm' between moves, continuous gameplay is just innately better suited to naval warfare.

 

Anyone designing a real-time WW2 naval battle game should really get an XP or earlier PC and familiarise themselves thoroughly with Fighting Steel. FS provides the tools and commands that are necessary to make continuous naval suface combat work, especially when you are in comamnd of several ships and are facing a similar-sized enemy force. For example, as the commander of a division, you can order 'targetting modes', which tell ships to engage (for example) either the greatest threat to themselves ('Threat targetting'), or the enemy opposite them ('Battleline targetting') and so on. The key thing is providing AI which enables subordinates to act according to such instructions, thereby avoiding  the need for micro-management and click fests, while giving the player just enough time to think - at least, as much time as he would in real life. FS also lets you fight your own ship in detail, while giving such 'tactical directives' to your other captains. And even when fighting your own ship, you can designate targets and order speeds and courses, and the singe-ship-handling AI will do the rest, like engaging whatever targets you have designated, including using main battery and secondaries at the same time, against the same or different targets. This sort of approach won't go so far as being able to handle the full Battle of Leyte Gulf, which is more of an admiral-level, strategy game scenario, but it can adequately handle its components eg Samar.

 

Atlantic Fleet is of course much superior to Fighting Steel in many ways, not least in integrating the land, planes and subs that FS had to leave out, and of course there's the massively superior visuals. And I would not under-estimate the challenge in getting all of these elements to work well in a real-time game, which FS's developers decided was too much, as their manual's 'designer's notes' make clear. Fighting Steel left out the land, planes and subs to make the project deliverable and the game workable; Atlantic Fleet adopted a turn-based approach. Both succeed nicely, in their own ways.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I still play naval warfare simulations' (NWS) Steam and Iron, and Rule the Waves. They only have 2D graphics but are very excellent naval games.

 

And yeah before that looked at SES' Jutland. Game was... problematic. Such a shame.

 

 

ps we've likely mentioned most naval games to date... just don't say world of warships...

Edited by Do335

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

how about World of Warships then? :rofl:

 

Steel Ocean I must try some more

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just had another go at Bismarck's last fight, playing again as RN but this time completing the battle. Not really a fair fight, even though Bismarck seems to have fixed her rudder damage!

 

As on the last play-through, I manouevred King Geroge V and Rodney independently, while gradually closing in with my two County class cruisers.

 

post-66801-0-34216500-1457892483.jpg

 

post-66801-0-89743500-1457893314.jpg

 

The un-damaged Bismarck is a more dangerous foe than in the real-life battle, managing to land hits on both my battleships, and starting a fire on Rodney, near 'C' turret. Still, we soon found the range and as per real life, Bismarck went down gallantly, with her colours shot off rather than struck.

 

post-66801-0-66454400-1457892532.jpg

 

post-66801-0-79857200-1457892539.jpg

 

Down she went, to where Robert Ballard would find her, many years later. Come to think it, that might make a good sim, Jacques Clouseau/Robert Ballard Simulator.

 

post-66801-0-34265800-1457892525.jpg

 

Anyone who has an interest in WW2 naval warfare really out to give this great big gem - it's certainly not a little gem - a go. I'm finding it a joy to play, and the ships, scenery and effects are lovely to behold.

 

post-66801-0-15498100-1457892498.jpg

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ps we've likely mentioned most naval games to date... just don't say world of warships...

Task Force 1942.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Task Force 1942.

eh good one Johan... gotta love the microprose classics.

 

Got anything more recent? I'm always on the look out for missing naval games. They're a bit rare/tough to find.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Couple of units I don't think I've illustrated before...

 

...British T Class submarine, above and below the surface:

 

AtlanticFleet 2016-03-13 19-29-32-18.jpg

 

AtlanticFleet 2016-03-13 19-20-10-77.jpg

 

...and a Lancaster, with 'Grand Slam' bomb (hitting Tirpitz while she's under way isn't as easy as when she's moored in a Norweigan fjord)...

 

AtlanticFleet 2016-03-13 19-21-21-08.jpg

 

Missed her by several hundred feet! Still, it would have been a shame to have mangled such an elegant virtual warship!

 

AtlanticFleet 2016-03-13 19-30-35-01.jpg

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

eh good one Johan... gotta love the microprose classics.

 

Got anything more recent? I'm always on the look out for missing naval games. They're a bit rare/tough to find.

 

Shells of Fury 1914 is an odd but somehow interesting title if you're into WW1 submarines

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Atlantic Fleet is the first game I've purchased since 2012, such is my jaundiced view of 95% of games these days.

 

Just enjoyed a slugfest between Nelson and Scharnhorst.  Nelson sunk the German......... eventually, but her lack of speed told, and she had to be scuttled, such was her damage.

 

Great fun.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just had a more modest battle, HMS Hotspur vs T-22, but it was a naibiting experience nevertheless. And while playing I found another advantage of the turn based system: I find it makes the anticipation of the incoming enemy salvo more tense, well for me anyway!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would have liked the ability in Custom Battles to be able to specify the location of the battle (which may not make much difference, as I haven't seen land and am not actually sure it exists, outside of the maps!) and to be able to set up an air attack without the need for at least one nearby ship, to 'call in the strike.' But create a little convoy, pick a sub to do battle with it, and the latter can call in the planes of your choice...

 

AtlanticFleet 2016-03-15 20-22-42-09.jpg

 

The advantage of having a sub nearby, of course, is that he can deal with the survivors, surfacing to use the deck gun after letting go with the tin fish...

 

AtlanticFleet 2016-03-15 20-29-10-58.jpg

 

The merchant ships are often modelled with AA or other deck guns and will certainly shoot at and sometimes knock down attacking planes, but they cannot engage surface targets, so your U-Boat is quite safe...

 

AtlanticFleet 2016-03-15 20-38-42-07.jpg

 

I would definitely like the ability to designate targets for the AI to engage with guns, including the ability to engage in the same firing turn with different weapons; and faster rates of fire for smaller calibres.  And for when you are gunning yourself, ranging with single shots, not salvoes, and the option to have wind and ship movement taken care of by your ship's analogue fire control computer in the Transmitting Station, so your role is more like that of the guys in the Director Control Tower, complete with some initial delay while you track the target, before feeding this down to the TS for them to factor in the rest, pass this on to the guns, and then sound the firing gong (you can hear them at about 49:40 here) so you can hit the Big Red Button. However, as it is, gunnery is very interesting and rather challenging, especially if you have wind effects turned on!

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just two things on my wishlist for now:

 

1) Map plotting tools (at least a ruler/compass and an angle ruler)

2) I feel that capital ships are too vulnerable to torpedos. It seems like it always takes just a single hit to sink a battleship. This is especially annoying since enemy subs tend to start at very close range. Granted I am still in 1939 so I guess the destroyer shield isn't particularly effective and maybe it will improve over time. At least the game models dud torpedos, which is a feature that has saved me a couple of times now!.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent!  Make the location a day or two past Gibralter enroute to Bizerte, throw in a couple Buckley and/or Edsall class DE's to prosecute the U-boat and fend off the torpedo-bombers, and you've got yourself an historical battle! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I really like the Custom Battle generator, which I have been using to have a crack with some of the aircraft in Atlantic Fleet, like the B-24 Liberator, which as well as an RAF Coastal Command version, is also available in USAAF finish (or should that be USN, in which case it's a PB4Y)...

 

AtlanticFleet 2016-03-16 19-30-31-24.jpg

 

...and there's the Short Sunderland, one of which was credited with shooting down six of Kampfgeschwader 40's Ju 88C long range fighters, in the Bay of Biscay in June 1943, only for the same mostly Aussie crew to fall victim to another KG40 formation, two months later...

 

AtlanticFleet 2016-03-15 22-04-36-75.jpg

 

It's also a good way to set up practice missions of your own, up to the ten ships per side limit. I just got my first U-Boat kill while escorting a small convoy in an 'I' Class destroyer, though my slow reactions in turning the convoy away from the sonar contact astern meant that a tanker at the rear of the centre column caught a torpedo, before I could get after our assailant.

 

AtlanticFleet 2016-03-16 19-33-03-39.jpg

 

AtlanticFleet 2016-03-16 19-27-57-94.jpg

 

I had a few cracks at the periscope with my guns, one of which I think did some damage, as the submarine seemed more intent upon putting another tin fish into the tanker, rather than getting away. I had a forward-firing 'Squid' but in my excitement, turned the wrong way at the last minute. Damn and blast! A rapid course reversal managed to take me over the U-Boat so I was able to let fly with my depth charges. I had slowed down a bit and was probably lucky they didn't blow my stern off, but nobody was more surprised than I, to find we got the sub.

 

AtlanticFleet 2016-03-16 19-39-55-01.jpg

 

A great game. Simplified, but it just 'feels right' - all the fun of an arcade game, but with more than enough of the wargame and the combat simulation in there, to make it not feel like you're playing one. A hard balance to get right, but Killerfish have pulled it off. Great fun, rewarding of skill, jam-packed full of content, and a joy to behold. Love it.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

...and Atlantic Fleet's dynamic 'Battle of the Atlantic' campaign has got me playing, something that the mighty Fighting Steel's campaign system never managed to do. Even when a turn doesn't generate a battle that you're called to fight, the results update screens give you something really good to look at...

 

AtlanticFleet 2016-03-16 22-06-35-85.jpg

 

And battles there are, a-plenty. I'm still finding my way and attacking cautiously to boot, avoiding risks rather than staying to fight it out toe-to-toe with the Royal Navy. At first, I keep my surface ships close to home waters and leave it to the U-Boats. Suddenly, I'm called to take over a battle that has developed. A mini-wolfpack, U-27 and U-28 working together, has encountered a small convoy and is well placed to attack, with one sub on either side. One is in a good position to have a crack at one of the two destroyer escorts, at the head of the convoy, and does so successfully, while the other goes for one of the merchantmen on the other side. The destroyer turns at the last minute, possibly having spotted my torpedoes. But my fan of three tin fish has been aimed with successive tracks short of the calculated interception point, in anticipation of a turn. He is quite badly knocked about by a single hit.

 

AtlanticFleet 2016-03-16 21-51-02-70.jpg

 

Two of the other sub's torpedoes also hit home, crippling a cargo ship, which begins to go under. Before the second destroyer can intervene from its station at the rear of the convoy, my first sub uses the torpedo I kept in the front tubes for self-defence to hit another cargo ship. Then I disengage, rather than hanging around with the undamaged destroyer's asdic pinging and all our front torpedo tubes needing reloaded.

 

AtlanticFleet 2016-03-16 21-52-06-70.jpg

 

Not long afterwards - I forget how long - the same two U-boats meet another convoy - with a battleship escort, as well as three destroyers. This time, the warships turn into my first sub's torpedoes and I have to settle for a hit from the other one, on a frieghter, which is damaged but does not sink. Again, rather than press my luck, I rather sheepishly go deep and disengage, passing up on the oportunity to sink a battleship as surprise has been well and truly lost.

 

Plucking up my courage, I decide to move Scharnhorst, Gneisenau and a destroyer, Leberecht Maas, from a holding position off Norway. The three succeed in breaking out into the mid-Atlantic, to the same zone where my two U-boats have been finding plenty of pickings.

 

AtlanticFleet 2016-03-16 22-15-05-64.jpg

 

My new-found valour is soon rewarded - my little battlefleet runs into a convoy, with just a single destroyer for escort!

 

AtlanticFleet 2016-03-16 22-14-24-73.jpg

 

AtlanticFleet 2016-03-16 22-14-50-59.jpg

 

We work up to full speed and begin a turn to port, to bring us onto a converging course with the convoy. Suddenly, my plans are thrown into disarray - the convoy has air cover! A Sunderland flying boat bumbles in for a bombing run, undeterred by our flak. He must be operating at maximum range, from one of those lakeland bases in Northern Ireland.

 

AtlanticFleet 2016-03-16 22-15-51-05.jpg

 

To make matters worse, his aim is good and a 250-lb bomb hits Maas, starting a fire. Verdamt! Fortunately, the Sunderland is on his own, and has shot his bolt.

 

AtlanticFleet 2016-03-16 22-17-28-32.jpg

 

The enemy destroyer now makes smoke to screen the convoy as it turns away to flee, then he charges us, shooting, possibly trying to get within torpedo range. He lands a single hit on Maas, but my two battlecriusers give up shelling the retreating merchantmen to concentrate their fire on the threat steaming right at us.

 

AtlanticFleet 2016-03-16 22-40-56-50.jpg

 

The bold destroyer soon goes down; my shooting eye seems to be in, today! And Maas succeeds in putting out the fire. She's a bit down by the bows, but still seaworthy and in action. I gather my force together. Guns silent for now, we rumble at top speed after the now-defenceless convoy. I hold my fire until we are practically on top of the fleeing ships, and after that it is really just a massacre. As I come abeam of the enemy, I switch from shooting with the forward 11-inch turrets and bring my 5.9 inch secondary batteries into play, to conserve the heavy-calibre ammunition.

 

AtlanticFleet 2016-03-16 23-01-16-96.jpg

 

So, a good result for the tonnage war! Maas is damaged but operational, and I will send her home at once - mid-Atlantic is not really a healthy place for German destroyers, with their unreliable high-pressure machinery and endurance limited by the need to retain fuel as ballast, to counter top-heaviness. But having wiped out one convoy, Scharnhorst and Gneisenau will continue to prowl the North Atlantic for a while, slipping back to a friendly port before the Home Fleet arrives to make the area really unhealthy for us. Perhaps I will draw them onto our U-Boats!

 

AtlanticFleet 2016-03-16 23-01-38-48.jpg

 

I have the impression that my two submarines had not reloaded their bow tubes when they ran into the second convoy, which may be a glitch; but that apart, I'm finding Atlantic Fleet's dynamic campaign really quite convincing - and rather addictive!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Similar Content

    • By MarkEAW
      I'm currently working more on the EAW Full Review:
      Its only really 10% me since I decided I should combine all the old 1998 and 99 reviews of EAW into one and try to correct errors in the information.
      It will allow thorough review of the game and should include v1.1 and v1.2 fixes at least noted where a negative bug is told.
      Its primarily for v1.0 of EAW, the 1998 reviews. then there's the v1.1 info I try to remember to post in the review to insure the reader knows a bug or condition was fixed in the MPS patches.
      Right now I'm combining three more detailed reviews into the help doc, so if there is anything you want in the review such as if there's errors in the info, let me know.
      Most old post in forums about EAW in early 1999, complained authors never updated their reviews for MPS official patches. They stayed with v1.0 or v1.1 for the content. So hopefully I'll get the to add where apparent, the patch info.
      Anything to add let me know here, thanks.
      Here's the current update. Some (actually a bunch) of information is reviewed maybe 2 or 3 times , said in a different manner since there edited paragraphs, and not yet move into the main and staying info usually above it.
      I'm breaking it down into sections just for this review. Normally I would just list topics with a few sections, here I have split some of the topics up into more sections, you'll see more soon as I complete moving the information over to this help doc. But here it is in its current shape:
      https://eaw.neocities.org/full-review.html  (perhaps refresh your browser to see the latest post of that page :)
       
       
    • By 76.IAP-Blackbird


      Here is a nice review about what il2 is and delivers for all those, who are asking what do they get for the money.
      Enjoy the reading 

      https://www.polygon.com/2020/9/22/21449885/microsoft-flight-simulator-combat-il-2-sturmovik-battle-of-bodenplatte
    • By 76.IAP-Blackbird
      Hey folks,
      After a few weeks spent with IL-2: Battle of Bodenplatte plus the intervening two years of development, I wanted to present to you my full review for IL-2: Battle of Bodenplatte.
       
      This latest title is more evolution than revolution that iterates on the series while giving us some legendary aircraft to fly. I think the developers made the right choice picking a late war western front scenario and I think the features and iterative evolution of the series over these last two years have made the IL-2 series stronger than ever.
       

       
      https://stormbirds.blog/2019/12/03/il-2-battle-of-bodenplatte-full-review/
       
      I hope you enjoy the review and I of course welcome others to share their own take on reviewing IL-2: Battle of Bodenplatte!
    • By 33LIMA
      Another Atlantic Fleet battle in Arctic waters!
       
       
       
      I have always been something of a fan of the big German destroyers of World War 2, ever since assembling tiny 1/1200 plastic kits of some of them in the early 1960s. These were made by Eagle, part a themed series representing the ships involved in the First and Second Battles of Narvik in April and June 1940. Like this one, of a Leberecht Maas class...or is it Erich Giese?
       

       
      Maas wasn't actually at Narvik, having been sunk in a disatrous 'friendly fire' incident in the North Sea, bombed at night by an He111 of KG 26 which didn't know the navy had laid on a mine-laying operation in the same area. Another destroyer from the force, Max Schulze, was lost with all hands immediately afterwards, some say from another bomb, others by a mine in the same area.
       
      Atlantic Fleet’s comprehensive set of historical battles doesn’t include the quite well-known actions at Narvik, the reason I believe being that the game’s 3D environments don’t include land – and these battles were fought in the confines of the fjords at Narvik. Which is quite something, especially considering that the second battle involved the Royal Navy hunting down and destroying the German shipping left from the first battle with nine destroyers and a battleship, no less. The photo below shows the battleship, HMS Warspite, in action during the battle, well into Ofotfjord.
       

       
      Big and powerful as they were, the German destroyers had rather less reliable machinery and being somewhat top-heavy, were less sea-worthy than their British counterparts, though all this seems to have gradually improved as the design was developed. At any rate, these are disadvantages which I don’t think affect them in Atlantic Fleet and having conquered Convoy PQ13 in my previous outing, I looked around for another historical battle featuring these ships. There are several more on offer and from these, I picked another Arctic encounter, one which came just over a month after the earlier battle. This was the German effort to sink HMS Edinburgh, in May 1942.

       
      The historical battle

      In late April 1942, Edinburgh left Murmansk as part of the force covering return Convoy QP11. The cruiser was carrying a substantial consignment of gold bullion, payment towards the war material then being convoyed to the Soviet Union.  Edinburgh was the sister-ship of the preserved HMS Belfast, a modified Town (or Southampton) Class cruiser, with twelve 6-inch guns. Belfast is seen below on the River Thames in London, before she was repainted in wartime camouflage.
       

       
      On this outing, Edinburgh was crippled by hits from two torpedoes fired by U-456, and forced to turn back to Murmansk, escorted by destroyers Foresight, Forester and some minelayers. One of the torpedoes had basically demolished Edinburgh's stern, as you can see from this contemporary photograph.
       

       
      Air attacks by torpedo bombers failed to sink Edinburgh. But on 2 May, she was found and attacked by three destroyers – Z 7 Herman Schoemann and the un-named Z 24 and Z 25, which had earlier sunk a merchantman in an inconclusive tussle with the convoy, before resuming their hunt for Edinburgh.

      In the action which followed, the crippled cruiser fought back and severely damaged Schoemann, which was abandoned and scuttled with 8 dead, the rest rescued by her consorts and a U-boat which arrived later. However, Edinburgh was torpedoed again by Z 24 or Z 25 and was abandoned and scuttled in turn, with 58 men lost in all.
       
      Edinburgh's gold bullion was recovered in the early 1980s in a salvage operation as dramatic as many a battle, but that's another story.
       
      How did I get on re-fighting the battle in Atlantic Fleet? It's time to find out!
       
      ...to be continued!
×

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..