Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Here's an interesting campaign idea

 

The Strategic Air Command was the most powerful military organization ever to exist, on 31 May 1992 it was ordered to shutdown

 

What if SAC had refused the order?

 

As a TAC pilot you'll have to intercept bombers, strike at SAC installations and hunt and kill Looking Glass

 

As a SAC bomber you'll have strike at TAC bases, Army and Marine positions, etc. Furthermore SAC FB-111's would be "hastily" outfitted for air to air combat in order to escort bombers and intercept TAC strike aircraft.

Edited by EnragedSith
Posted

Here's an interesting campaign idea

 

The Strategic Air Command was the most powerful military organization ever to exist, on 31 May 1992 it was ordered to shutdown

 

What if SAC had refused the order?

 

As a TAC pilot you'll have to intercept bombers, strike at SAC installations and hunt and kill Looking Glass

 

As a SAC bomber you'll have strike at TAC bases, Army and Marine positions, etc. Furthermore SAC FB-111's would be "hastily" outfitted for air to air combat in order to escort bombers and intercept TAC strike aircraft.

 

Neat idea. I personally don't ever see a refusal like that taking place, but it's still a neat backdrop.

 

The problem though, is that I don't think SAC would ever stand a chance. Unescorted bombers are toast, and A2G planes outfitted with AIM-120s and AIM-9s just won't be able to get the job done. (also, '92 is quite late)

 

But that's just my .02¢ - that doesn't mean it wouldn't be a fun thing to play. :)

Posted

 

The problem though, is that I don't think SAC would ever stand a chance. Unescorted bombers are toast, and A2G planes outfitted with AIM-120s and AIM-9s just won't be able to get the job done. (also, '92 is quite late)

 

 

SAC bombers were very good at ECM and fequently NORAD had to call Sierra Juliet (stop jamming) during exersizes because they couldn't recover their fighters

 

I agree that the FB-111's won't last, it's a desperation move by the SAC side. If one wants, those states that were reliant on SAC facilities for their local economies could have their ANG units "defect" to the SAC side

Posted

Why not call it operation Skyshield?

 

http://en.wikipedia....ation_Skyshield

 

The idea is that it's not an exersize and nobody is "playing" Ruskie, overall when the Pentagon put a bullet in SAC's brain there was alot of negative feelings by SAC personnel. This scenario explores the hypothetical of if those feelings had devolved into beliefs of betrayal and treason (the view being that SAC's canning by the Chief's is giving aid and comfort to a potential aggressor)

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..