+lindr2 Posted June 15, 2008 Posted June 15, 2008 (edited) Question in relation to the Chinese AA missiles in weapons pack. PL-7,PL-8,PL-11 are R-550, pyton-3 & Aspide the analogues, but here have very bad CM/noise rejection descriptions, what is such supposition based on? Edited June 15, 2008 by lindr2 Quote
kukulino Posted June 15, 2008 Posted June 15, 2008 (edited) Mmm, try this older topic on Thirdwire page. Poeple talking about soviet and western missiles in SFP1 series in that topic. Some opinons are interesting, another funny http://bbs.thirdwire.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=4854 After see this topic was soviet weapons pack project started. Waiting for new patch. Than we can try update soviet (chinese too, maybe) missile characteristiques if it is needed again. Project: http://forum.combatace.com/index.php?showtopic=24967 Edited June 15, 2008 by kukulino Quote
+lindr2 Posted June 15, 2008 Author Posted June 15, 2008 I read this monts ago, in http://forum.combatace.com/index.php?showtopic=24967 last post is My. I make "home use" patch for weapons pack in soviet weapons part (fix some bugs, add new missiles etc.) Some questions was difficult, i e R-23T was maked in All Aspect variant, but after start in service, results exposed a firing test, that at a frontal attack a detonator malfunctions was very often. But I don't have needed information about chinese AAM, if to follow soviet practice, efficiency of the Chinese analogues of western AAM must be on 15-25 % below, USSR acted thus at the export of weapon in non-WP countries. If you want, i can send my weapon.ini variant to discussion. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.