Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Question in relation to the Chinese AA missiles in weapons pack. PL-7,PL-8,PL-11 are R-550, pyton-3 & Aspide the analogues, but here have very bad CM/noise rejection descriptions, what is such supposition based on?

Edited by lindr2

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mmm, try this older topic on Thirdwire page. Poeple talking about soviet and western missiles in SFP1 series in that topic. Some opinons are interesting, another funny :biggrin:





After see this topic was soviet weapons pack project started. Waiting for new patch. Than we can try update soviet (chinese too, maybe) missile characteristiques if it is needed again.





Edited by kukulino

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

I read this monts ago, in http://forum.combatace.com/index.php?showtopic=24967 last post is My.


I make "home use" patch for weapons pack in soviet weapons part (fix some bugs, add new missiles etc.) Some questions was difficult, i e R-23T was maked in All Aspect variant, but after start in service, results exposed a firing test, that at a frontal attack a detonator malfunctions was very often.

But I don't have needed information about chinese AAM, if to follow soviet practice, efficiency of the Chinese analogues of western AAM must be on 15-25 %

below, USSR acted thus at the export of weapon in non-WP countries.


If you want, i can send my weapon.ini variant to discussion.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  


Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..