Jump to content

RamblingSid

JAGDSTAFFEL 11
  • Posts

    208
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by RamblingSid

  1. Many thanks, almccoyjr, for your comments and suggestions. Following through on your observations I did partially disassemble the js - bloody hell, the innards are much more complicated than I imagined. Couldn't locate the "pot" (hangs head in shame). There was a cage thing that seemed to house the socket for the js ball but I couldn't go further than taking the bottom of the housing off. I couldn't see any electrical contacts to clean. I did use a little wd40 on the js ball. Js works no better (and no worse). I didn't mention that the twist function rudder packed in ages ago, I use pedals so no issue but perhaps an indication that all is not well - I think it may be time to replace. Didn't know you could tinker with response curves in OFF (I have gone through the set-up via properties), I'll look into that. Thanks again.
  2. Hi almccoyjr, thanks for your response. I've played OFF for a couple of years - always used the saitek js. I think the insensitivity has always been there but it has become much more evident lately. Due, perhaps, to a couple of factors: i) Just (re)found the Survival in the Air thread and realised that my experience with the Camel did not match. Other Sopwith types imo are better but there is still a "waterlogged" feel and lack of sharpness in handling. ii) I also play ROF. As you know, it uses a different flight model so I don't want to make invalid comparisons. But I noticed that after flying the Camel for a couple of weeks it suddenly became much more tractable. I am not a good pilot, hence my query abt the js. Sorry that this is so subjective and, tbh, it may be that I am making an invalid comparison. If that is the case I will simply have to accept the situation and enjoy the other outstanding elements of OFF. (love the cloud scapes in OFF, like flying in a Turner or Constable, great aesthetics). Cheers
  3. hi all, I currently use a saitek evo force js. Had it for a few years and it has worked well, up until recently. But I now find it just not sensitive enough. Example: when flying the Camel I can heave the js around with only sedate responses from the a/c - I have to try really hard to get it to spin. Aileron control seems very slow so that a break to the right (the Camel's strength I thought) is not fast enough to evade any EA on the 6. Elevator responses are, on the other hand, much better. Take off/landing a piece of cake with only very gentle torque effects I may be wrong but I have never read of the Camel having "sedate" handling characteristics. I have read the guide to the Camel in the Survival in the Air thread and I can only say that my experience with the Camel does not tally. No issues with the Camel guide I may say - it reflects the handling characteristics I have read about elsewhere. My parameters: no auto-rudder, flight model set to "realistic", Force Feeback switched on. Course I am a crap "pilot" and this may be the real problem but I do think the js may be stuffed. I only fly Sopwiths so have little experience with other types. Any thoughts about how to ginger up control responses ? Thanks
  4. Hi Uncleal. thanks for your reply and sorry for any confusion - I should have been clearer. Do not get the new system until later this week. The low frame rates are with the E6850/8600GT/Vista set-up. I expect you are right abt Vista, this is the first real prob I've had tbh. Not very used to posting so apols if the reply is a bit out of kilter. RS Please Excuse . . . I'm a bit confused after reading your post. Does the Low FPS condition exist presently with the Windows 7 rig OR Did the condition exist, prior to the upgrade to Windows 7 ?. . . If that's the case . . . you've stumbled onto one of reasons why Microsoft came out with Windows 7 when it did The utter unpredictability of VISTA . . which I'm glad I never had to deal with. My last rig was in XP <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you're presently having the low FPS woes . . . I'd look at the monitor. . as I've run a 27" for quite awhile . . .and when I got Windows 7, it installed it on it's own . . which totally surprised me . . .I had the Driver Disc in my hand Which causes me to think of an interesting possibility Is the Windows 7, distributed Down Under, lacking that feature ? I'd run the installation disc
  5. Evening (NSW time) all, I'm new here, although I have flown OFF for a year or so. Have struck a problem with running OFF since acquiring a 27 inch 1920x1080 monitor. FRPS are way down compared to my previous 22 inch 1680x1050 screen: 6-8 Vs 30-45. That's no good at all. In fact OFF is unflyable and, believe me, I have tried. I have checked the new resolution in OFF Workshop, NVIDIA control Panel and Windows. All ok. Sliders set at 52251. My system: E6850, 8600 GT, 2G RAM, Vista Have I missed something here ? I am more curious than anything as the whole debacle spurred me into updating the entire system: 2500K, GTX 570 OC, 8G RAM, Windows7. Many thanks for a great forum to go with an extraordinary sim. Bar steward...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..