+Olham Posted July 10, 2009 Posted July 10, 2009 After seeing SGCSG1's "thank you for the tip above, I realise again, how much is offered in BHaH (and how little some of us check and investigate - like the great "Workshop").
+RAF_Louvert Posted July 10, 2009 Author Posted July 10, 2009 Alrighty then, so it looks like a "NO" to including this new tweak in the official DiD standards, but a "YES" to OFF's ability to be adjusted to nearly everyone's liking. I'll just make an entry to that affect here in my little BHaH notebook..."no to the brill idea presented by Louvert, but yes to the obvious"...there, got it.
Waldemar Kurtz Posted July 11, 2009 Posted July 11, 2009 This I like. It certainly overcomes the stupidity of 'scramble' victories being refused. I used to telephone Wing and scream down the line that they could come and count the bloody wrecks on the field if they didn't believe me! Hope Siggi picks up on this and changes the DiD rules offically. BTW, did you catch the note in another thread that ALL documents, ranks and medal awards are having an historical immersion overhaul... that might include 'proper' claim forms á la the facsmilie you posted a long time back Louvert. that's true-- I've had British pilots flame 5 German planes in a single scramble sortie and have every last claim denied in spite of one of the German plans CRASHING into a hangar at my very own aerodrome!
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now