Olham 164 Posted July 10, 2009 After seeing SGCSG1's "thank you for the tip above, I realise again, how much is offered in BHaH (and how little some of us check and investigate - like the great "Workshop"). Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RAF_Louvert 101 Posted July 10, 2009 Alrighty then, so it looks like a "NO" to including this new tweak in the official DiD standards, but a "YES" to OFF's ability to be adjusted to nearly everyone's liking. I'll just make an entry to that affect here in my little BHaH notebook..."no to the brill idea presented by Louvert, but yes to the obvious"...there, got it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Waldemar Kurtz 1 Posted July 11, 2009 This I like. It certainly overcomes the stupidity of 'scramble' victories being refused. I used to telephone Wing and scream down the line that they could come and count the bloody wrecks on the field if they didn't believe me! Hope Siggi picks up on this and changes the DiD rules offically. BTW, did you catch the note in another thread that ALL documents, ranks and medal awards are having an historical immersion overhaul... that might include 'proper' claim forms á la the facsmilie you posted a long time back Louvert. that's true-- I've had British pilots flame 5 German planes in a single scramble sortie and have every last claim denied in spite of one of the German plans CRASHING into a hangar at my very own aerodrome! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
