Ju-87B Picchiatelli, Regia Aeronautica

[Wrench 9,849]

View File

Ju-87B Picchiatelli, Regia Aeronautica

---

Junkers Ju-87B Picchiatelli, Regia Aeronautica, for SF/SFG/WoV/WoE MTO Style Installs

-06 Patch Level Installs ONLY

 

 

This is a mod of Pasko's Ju-87B Stuka into the version as used by the Italian Regia Aeronautica in the Med and North Africa.

 

This is a complete aircraft mod, with all the parts needed to just unzip, install and fly away.

 

The skin, while not perfectly historical (see Notes below), is based off the standard Luftwaffe splinter pattern of 70/71/65. It represents aircraft from 236 Squadriglia, 96 Gruppo in the timeframe of approximately 1940-42, when these aircraft were retired (ie: replaced with D models). Since no RA bombs exist, the aircraft uses 'standard issue' Luftwaffe weapons.

 

All the lights have been dialed in to their (more or less) proper positions, and the landing light now works. (see Notes below for how)

 

A new WoE-style Hangar Screens is included, along with a new Loading Screen, as are the damage tgas I made several years ago.

 

= IMPORTANT: This aircraft is designed for use in SF/SFG/WoV/WoE, at the 06 patch level -ONLY-, It has =NOT= been tested it in post 08 patch SF/SFG/WoV/WoE/WoI. It has also NOT been tested in the NextGen, SF2 series. You use it in these enviroments at your own risk. =

 

=This mod is designed for use with the WW2 Weapons Pak by me, as it contains all the needed weapons . If attempting to use this aircraft with any other weapons pak, you'll need to add ALL the WW2 era bombs, torpedoes, guns, etc. They are NOT included in this package.=

 

As always, unzip this to a temp folder somwhere, and you'll have access to the rest of the readme for it's instructions. It's reccomended you read it all the way through, so as to be familarized with the procedures, and whatever issues I've encountered.

 

Good Hunting!

Wrench

Kevin Stein

---

• Submitter
  Wrench
• Submitted
  11/12/2009
• Category
  Axis Bombers

 

[+Baltika 85]

Excellent, thanks very much for this one