SiThSpAwN

No, thank you...

Sorry for having a differing opinion from yours, I'll try to be better in the future...

Well everyone is entitled to their own opinion of course... nothing really exists from when you were a Tester, the Nevada map was re-rebuilt just a couple years ago, but anyways, I am not trying to convince you of anything, just stating my opinion. Everyone gets to believe what they like.

I can see both sides of the fence when it comes to the rash of trainers we are seeing, I mean in many ways it makes sense to start with a trainer for your first module. But I can also see the argument stating why not do an older fighter, I think when its all said and done, trainers probably have the most information available to these teams, they probably have an abundance of pilots willing to chat about the, etc (although we saw the legal struggles VEAO seemed to have with their Hawk, but then when lawyers stick their noses in, all bets are off :) ). I am into the Hawk because of the RCAF connection, but like most, trainers are not what I am really interested in, I want the big guns...

Maps should start moving faster once they have gotten the creation tools and how to merge them with DCS World down, I think the complexity is much greater than Arma 3, but certainly we arent going to see 3-4 year delays on maps, unless they decide to redo the engine with each new map... It really doesnt make much sense to judge development time of a map based on what we are going through right now.