Atreides 144 Posted December 26, 2008 ooohh outdated F-16's(maybe) and the Jihad powered Mirage III's...cmon that does not really qualify as a hostile move I mean which gen of F-16 (craps) are they moving along with the long in the tooth Mirage III (Rose ?). Big deal, the SU-30 MKI's that India so loves should easily take out the F-16's and the Mirage III, if it ever came to that. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Silverbolt 104 Posted December 26, 2008 well, no matter wich out of dated is the plane if it can carry a nuke. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Atreides 144 Posted December 26, 2008 True ! Let's make the world a better place (my honest opinion) and start by nuking an "ally" of the U.S...PAKISTAN. Something that should have been done like oh well 1947..Thanks for nuthin......... @#$% Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Silverbolt 104 Posted December 26, 2008 (edited) well , i didn't said that, but IMHO the Pakistan should think like this "nuke at will" think. at least i would think , if i had no chance to win/sustaine a conflict with a enemy 10 times bigger than me. but i think they should balance this disadvantage with another armed force,like army. Edited December 26, 2008 by Silverbolt Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
+ghostrider883 526 Posted December 26, 2008 (edited) It seems all this military movement just a like a tactic to nullify the diplomatic pressure that Pakistan is being put under by the whole world. They find themselves alone. Even Saudi Arabia and China, their closest allies, are criticising Pakistan. They are busy boasting If India attack, there will be hell to pay Meanwhile they tried to blame a "supposed Indian national" for Lahore bomb blast and were trying to prove India's hand in Lahore blasts. It backfired, as usual. A Pakistan based terror group forward and claimed responsibility Edited December 26, 2008 by ghostrider883 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites