Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
I'd like to volunteer myself for testing. :good:

 

 

Woooha!!! $16,000 ???

 

- Test failed.

 

ARGH! I didn't catch the pricetag! Suddenly, my little ol' PC monitor is looking better and better all the time. :biggrin:

Posted

It's a valid question though... I still have a 19" monitor, because I have never liked this wide screen thing!..It always looks wrong to me!..and stretched...does anyone else find this? (same with TV's)

Posted
It's a valid question though... I still have a 19" monitor, because I have never liked this wide screen thing!..It always looks wrong to me!..and stretched...does anyone else find this? (same with TV's)

Agree! I see all these new LCD TV sets and they seem to show things...well...wrong!

Posted

Widow - here we agree. Even on a 19", the view can only concentrate on the

mid section - for the corners, you must really look there, away from the mid.

 

So, I don't want a widescreen. It's a bit like panorama fotos - funny to look at,

but you can't see the whole at once.

Guest British_eh
Posted

Hey there:

 

I have an LG 22" 4:3 screen, which after a 19" I find quite fabulous. It's all I can fit in my desk configuration, but it's resolution is fantastic. Certainly my Geforce 8800GTX although not the best, is giving me 25 - 50 FPS, which I find quite good.

 

Cheers,

 

British_eh

Posted
Widow - here we agree. Even on a 19", the view can only concentrate on the

mid section - for the corners, you must really look there, away from the mid.

 

So, I don't want a widescreen. It's a bit like panorama fotos - funny to look at,

but you can't see the whole at once.

 

16:9 or 16:10 is very natural IF the software is written for it and BHaH fully supports it. I agree with unclean; for desktop use, 30" is just about perfect.

 

I run a Sony GDM-FW900 which is a 24" flat panel monitor. Being glass, she weighs 109lbs. 1920 x 1200 x 32 @ 75hz and is very natural, very good, especially with TIR4. I can go up to 2048, but that's out of the recommended sweet spot for best viewing.

 

You can try a little test and get a better understanding why wide screen is "wide screen". Sit at your desk and put any scene up on your monitor using your browser. Now in the address bar, put a single character in the middle of the address bar. Center yourself so that your eyes and the character are inline. Try to relax and look only at the character. Without taking your focus off the character, take "note" as to what's in your sight at 12 o'clock in the background, at 3, 9 and 6 as well. After doing it several times, I think you'll find that your peripheral vision a 3 and 9 is better than at 12 and 6, with 6 being the worse. That's what wide screen does with well written software, it brings your 3 and 6 into play without having to look, and heightens your awareness at 12. If you "play" at it long enough, you can actually map out the "ark" from 3 to 12 to 6. It's really cool. While working on the center, you don't lose what's in the "background" at 3 and 6 and your 12 recognition is much better.

 

 

16:9, 16:10 is really close to natural vision, imho, where 4:3 is closer to a mild case of tunnel vision.

 

Panorama photos aren't natural, so they do look funny.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..