Olham 164 Posted July 28, 2009 (edited) Looking through Peter Kilduff's book THE RED BARON, I often stopped at this portrait of Lothar von Richthofen. To me, it presents the look of a young man, who has been facing his own mortality. If I compare the picture with his brother Manfred and the hospital photo, I find a big difference in the expression. And when I look at the wreckage of his Fokker Dr.1, I wonder how he survived it. Edit: what makes me wonder - the report said, Lothar had lost one (the upper?) wing. But this crashed Fokker doesn't look like that. Edited July 28, 2009 by Olham Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JFM 18 Posted July 28, 2009 Hi, Olham, Yes, Lothar's account is a bit exaggerated; "my triplane had turned into a biplane," and all that. Still, he endured structural damage and lost much of the fabric of his upper wing--some contend due to return fire during the combat. He nursed the triplane to earth with limited controllability--he wrote he could not turn because the "rudder no longer functioned" but said nothing of his ailerons--but at low altitude encountered a high-tension wire, attempted to maneuver, lost control of the triplane and crashed. Received facial (obviously) and leg injuries. Looking through Peter Kilduff's book THE RED BARON, I often stopped at this portrait ofLothar von Richthofen. To me, it presents the look of a young man, who has been facing his own mortality. If I compare the picture with his brother Manfred and the hospital photo, I find a big difference in the expression. And when I look at the wreckage of his Fokker Dr.1, I wonder how he survived it. Edit: what makes me wonder - the report said, Lothar had lost one (the upper?) wing. But this crashed Fokker doesn't look like that. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites