PadFoot Posted March 3, 2010 Posted March 3, 2010 If I already have IL-2 Sturmovik 1946, why would I want to have CFS2? Quote
Sakai Posted March 3, 2010 Posted March 3, 2010 can't think of a reason, lol, only CFS i would buy is the third one to use with OFF. Quote
Slartibartfast Posted March 3, 2010 Posted March 3, 2010 I have both and ever since I purchased IL-2 Pacific Fighters I have not touched my CFS2 disks as IL-2 Pacific / 1946 (Which I now own) beat it hands feet everything down... Quote
ONETINSOLDIER Posted March 3, 2010 Posted March 3, 2010 (edited) diversity? just because? sh|ts and giggles? for the fun of it? cos you can? to fulfill some inner need? stimulate the economy? piss off the wife/girlfriend? Edited March 3, 2010 by ONETINSOLDIER Quote
gumpy Posted March 3, 2010 Posted March 3, 2010 PadFoot do you have your copy of IL-2 Sturmovik 1946 modded?If not go here All Aircraft Arcade :: Index or here Special Aircraft Service - Index Quote
PadFoot Posted March 4, 2010 Author Posted March 4, 2010 PadFoot do you have your copy of IL-2 Sturmovik 1946 modded?If not go here All Aircraft Arcade :: Index or here Special Aircraft Service - Index Hey gumpy! Thanks for the pointers!! It turns me on when I hit the WWI projects forum. Wasn't aware of IL-2's engine can be used for WWI scenarios. Should be a blast I say! Would you folks fill me in on WWI fighters? I mean general information regarding the aerodynamics sides of thins and aircraft specifications. I know every well about F-16, F-15, F-22, EF-2000, JAS-39, Spitfire, Tornado, Typhoon....etc. I mean the ceiling, cruise speed, AoA, range....all those you know... Quote
fatkat357 Posted November 21, 2010 Posted November 21, 2010 If I already have IL-2 Sturmovik 1946, why would I want to have CFS2? It will probably be a come-down. I played CFS2 last summer and had a ball. I then tried playing Sturmovik - what an incredibly demanding sim (by comparison, of course). If you can get around just getting off the ground, to say nothing of getting back and finishing a mission, then that's way ahead of CFS2. Quote
JediMaster Posted November 22, 2010 Posted November 22, 2010 Even CFS3 had much easier stock flight modelling than Il-2. The 3rd party mod planes for both CFS2 and 3 were more demanding, but never seemed to overwhelm at first try like Il-2 did. Of course, once you got the hang of it in Il-2 it wasn't so much trouble (aside from carrier landings!) Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.