Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Guest rscsjsuso5
Posted

i know flight manual but what is evenlope manual, can you clarify. if you mean the physical paper manual documents to fly the aircraft - meaning train to student and taught by fighter pilot pros and so then we will try to find sources for you. scratching my head right now.

Posted

Flying a lot the 19S lately, and it's a true UFO in the game (series 1, hard FM settings). It accelerates like nothing. In early 60's nothing can touch you if you are careful. I know it was a very good airplane, but sooooo good???

I have discovered an error in it's data.ini. It is about 600 kg lighter than in real life. I corrected it, but the plane is a monster nevertheless, and very easy to fly.

I have read this plane was not very liked by Soviet pilots, because was difficult to fly, so I think the stock FM is not very correct.

Posted

HAve you recieved the stuff I have send you about the DDR 23 and 21 ?! You haven`t replied Erwin .. sorry for hacking this topic drinks.gif

 

 

Hmmm...I got your YG's 23...and no 21....

Posted

Flying a lot the 19S lately, and it's a true UFO in the game (series 1, hard FM settings). It accelerates like nothing. In early 60's nothing can touch you if you are careful. I know it was a very good airplane, but sooooo good???

I have discovered an error in it's data.ini. It is about 600 kg lighter than in real life. I corrected it, but the plane is a monster nevertheless, and very easy to fly.

I have read this plane was not very liked by Soviet pilots, because was difficult to fly, so I think the stock FM is not very correct.

 

19S is a very good aircraft in 1960s,and J-6 have got the victory in Iran-Pakistan mock air combat. If you know Iran fly F-5 series....

 

19S is almost real...19S have low wing load and very good T/W (>1)in 1960s.

 

MiG-19SF(I don't know the true name,sorry) have a 1.23 T/W(better than F-35A)in half fuel weight,it is real UFO...

 

The problem of MiG-19S is hard to control ,no HUD,no good enough RWR,and have not so good weapon and no radar ............

Posted

The Q-5 is an interesting concept of the MiG-19 design, if it were made as a fighter not a fighte bomber with a nice radar and missile capability, it would outperform some jets in it`s time period. I like the designm a nice twin engined fighter! realy needs a rework!

Posted

The Q-5 is an interesting concept of the MiG-19 design, if it were made as a fighter not a fighte bomber with a nice radar and missile capability, it would outperform some jets in it`s time period. I like the designm a nice twin engined fighter! realy needs a rework!

 

 

As you wish....

 

Luckly I took a photo:

 

QJ-5 test plane,fighter version of Q-5

post-27883-12730606543369.jpg

post-27883-12730606835055.jpg

Posted

How was it?! Never knew it was a fighterplaneversion build out of the Q-5?!

 

 

Blue part of nose could be a range radar or some thing like this.

 

Pitot tube is move to outborad od wings.

 

Some sources said Q-5 can do better dogfight than MiG-19S in low speed and low altitude. And Q-5 is much easier in contorl problems than MiG-19S.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..