UllyB Posted August 30, 2010 Posted August 30, 2010 I tried a SU-22 from the SU-17/20/22 pack in the download section. The plane flies fine except it tilts (is this the right word ?) on the right side. I mean it yaws slow to the right in time and is rotating to the right slow in time. I looked into aircraft data.ini file but all the symetric parts data looked fine to me. Any idea what can cause such behavior ? Can that be corrected ? Quote
UllyB Posted August 30, 2010 Author Posted August 30, 2010 loadout? Loadout is symetrical , of course. :) Quote
+Cliff7600 Posted August 30, 2010 Posted August 30, 2010 Nothing serious : Open the data.ini file All the Ymac= entries on the right side must be + RightWing Ymac=-0.90 and RightStab Ymac=-0.76 must be modified to : [RightWing] Ymac=0.90 [RightStab] Ymac=0.76 It worked fine for me, hope it will for you ;) Quote
UllyB Posted August 31, 2010 Author Posted August 31, 2010 Nothing serious : Open the data.ini file All the Ymac= entries on the right side must be + RightWing Ymac=-0.90 and RightStab Ymac=-0.76 must be modified to : [RightWing] Ymac=0.90 [RightStab] Ymac=0.76 It worked fine for me, hope it will for you ;) all values are + on right Wing and right stab and - (negative) for left wing and left stab, so no problem here. The values are different from what you suggest but they are symetrical. I discovered other things searching for the answer and I think these are the causes. The weapon station attachment points have different values (slightly but different) for LEFT and RIGHT. I couldn't suspect that from the very beginning of course. It would've been the last place I would search. First I didn't understand why were those small differences but in the end I got it. The plane (the model I have) have some ...asymetrical loadouts, some navigation pod and three other three special pylons. My guess is that who made it , it tuned it so fine to support all those original equipment. Truth is I didn't check his complex loadout scheme, I took his word for it. Instead I corrected slightly some values of the attachment points to obtain an equilibrium. Of course I didn't succeed 100% but I am satisfied with the results. Thank you anyway for guding. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.