Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

To go OT a little bit, when I look at WW1 aircraft, I find some very ugly, and others look superb, but very often, you cannot tell just by looking at it, what makes a good aircraft.

 

I wouldn't say they all look the same, but visually, I find it's very hard to pick out the exceptional aircraft from the 'also rans'.

 

I find myself lacking the visual vocabulary to judge power, strength, speed and stability from photo's.

 

Say for example those WW2 Hurricane pilots seeing a Spitfire arrive, I can see at once why they would be grinning. But would I be blown away the first time I saw my first SE5? I might feel a lot better once I'd flown it, but visually? .....

Posted

Here is at least one Roland Payen design for you, Hauksbee - but you're right - can't get in to the "dannysoar" site.

 

http://modelarchives.free.fr/Bestiaire/Payen_P400_P/index.html

 

Flyby, I guess there are some great aircraft, which were commonly regarded as rather ugly;

like the S.E.5a, the Hawker Hurricane or the McDonnell Douglas "Phantom".

Personally, I liked all three of them. Of course, the Spitfire has the elegant timeless design,

which I as a designer really love to look at.

But no other British fighter could come back to base with as much damage done to it

as the Hawker Hurricane. And it was the "ugly sister", which brought the German bombers

down over England; not the Spitfire (which was tangling with the "Messerschmidt's").

Posted (edited)

I wouldn't say they all look the same, but visually, I find it's very hard to pick out the exceptional aircraft from the 'also rans'.

I know how you feel. I'd never the pick the DH-2 as being the one that put a end to the "Fokker Scourge" On the other hand, the E.III has such a 'modern' layout that I'd never pick it to be such a turkey to fly.

Edited by Hauksbee
Posted

Here is at least one Roland Payen design for you, Hauksbee - but you're right - can't get in to the "dannysoar" site.

Nice one, Olham. I'd not seen this one...and with contra-rotating props.(?) Payens was certainly pushing the envelope for his time. It's a shame that we'll never know if any of them would have panned out.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..