Hauksbee 103 Posted November 8, 2011 (edited) Found these while looking for something else. Classical serendipity. The top pic. seems to be true color photography, though the primitive color technology required very long exposures. The bottom two look like color retouch. Edited November 8, 2011 by Hauksbee Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Olham 164 Posted November 8, 2011 (edited) Here's a website with original colour photos from 1917 and 1918: http://www.worldwaronecolorphotos.com/ Edited November 8, 2011 by Olham Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RAF_Louvert 101 Posted November 8, 2011 . Wonderful old photos, and a great link, (I've been to that site many times over the years). Thanks for sharing, Hauksbee and Olham. . Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Davy TASB 0 Posted November 8, 2011 Here's a very rare and seldom seen, extremely authentic colour piccy from WW1. :yes: Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hasse Wind 46 Posted November 8, 2011 (edited) As far as I know, that Nupe shown in Hauksbee's post is an actual colour photo, not retouched. Most old colour photographs are French, because the were the pioneers in that field. There was a famous Russian photographer, Sergei Prokudin-Gorskii, who took lots of colour photos from the final years of the Russian Empire. They are also extremely fascinating. Here's one of his pics, showing Austro-Hungarian prisoners in some Russian camp in Karelia (quite close to Finland), the year is 1915: Edited November 8, 2011 by Hasse Wind Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Olham 164 Posted November 8, 2011 An excellent photo! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Flyby PC 23 Posted November 8, 2011 There's definitely something about colour.... Did anybody else read the bit about the French Poilus? I knew they were called Poilus, but never knew why. "Poilus" (hairy) is the nickname to French WWI soldiers, since they could not afford the luxury of regular shaving. It is a term of affection, especially now. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hasse Wind 46 Posted November 8, 2011 An excellent photo! I'd say it's hard to take a better one with a modern digital camera. And when you think about the relatively primitive cameras of the early 20th century, it's obvious the man was a master photographer. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites