Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I actually think, that the Tu-4 is too tiny, rather than the other way round  :blink:

 

No , no brother, everything is perfectly fine with the B-29, this is the new model from A-team, I tried with the old model ...  same proportions. I compared with other models and weapons, indicating that the problem only in the BQM.

Posted

 

 

his is the new model from A-team

why would you want that one, when there's really nothing with the user-made versions from Monty's B-29 we have here? (other than a few FM tweeks needed)

 

have you check the proportions (span, lenght, etc) of the Firebee in the Lod Viewer? You can get the distance readouts from there

Posted

never mind ... I found a copy of the model hiding in an archive.

 

the model has too large a "world set".. I measured in at 21 meter in length, with a 6 meter span (fues to wing tip, 12+ meters overall).

 

what it looks like is, when it was first built, someone set the "world measurements" to metric, but plugged in the US Standard numbers

 

  • Crew: None
  • Length: 22 ft 10 in (7.00 m)
  • Wingspan: 12 ft 10 in (3.91 m)
  • Empty weight: 1,500 lb (680 kg)
  • Gross weight: 2,500 lb (1,135 kg)
  • Powerplant: 1 × Continental J69-T-29A, 1,700 lbf (7.6 kN) each

 

in the image below, I had my mouse pointer at the end of the tail.

So, yes indeed. The proportions are waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy off!!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..