FastCargo

As far as I know it can't be done...limitation of game engine. FastCargo

F-22 engines would be more than useless on a B-52. On the other hand, engines from a modern airliner would be MUCH better for the B-52's regime of flight. And it's been proposed before. FastCargo

You could probably offset the increasing of the sensor FOV and gimble limit by reducing the G turn ability of the missile. Or simply decrease the probability of intercept. The end result - lots of firings but not too many hits. FastCargo

This is the result I got: http://forum.combatace.com/index.php?act=S...hlite=%2BUberAI One page, about 20 entries. However, I limited my search to the TW section, and used specific case sensitive options. I would suggest always using the advanced options when using the Search function. Also, don't bother trying to search by alpha numeric (ie F-16, etc)...that doesn't work. Appears to be something specific to the type of software the board uses. FastCargo

And if not, simply do a new, fresh, patched install of WOE (I assume that's the F-15 you want when you say 'stock') in a new directory and just copy the F-15 directory over to your current install. Done. FastCargo

This is a replacement to the old F-15 ACTIVE mod I posted some time ago. This has the aircraft, and everything else, just no cockpit. The old F-15 ACTIVE canard mod has been deleted. FastCargo

Well, the result will still be the same...for aircraft that are exclusive to WOE/WOV, you will need to extract the files from the WOE Objectdata.cat file to get them to work in WOI. FastCargo

Well, you can flip it around. Do a basic install of WOI, patch it up, then move the core files (CATs, DLLs, EXEs,etc ) to your WOE install and overwrite (with exceptions). Do not move the ini files...you will proabably lose mods if you do that. Also, anything that is exclusive to WOV/WOE (F-100, F-105, etc) will be lost UNLESS you extract the particular files needed for that aircraft/object to it's respective folder. FastCargo

Miracles, It's not that difficult to do that all on your own. There are threads here at CA that cover it. FastCargo

Whatta mean? I have a 1993 campaign I built for WOE that works just fine.... FastCargo

Won't quite work that way...I've tried. The missile will rotate, but when you fire it, it will fire in the direction dictated in the ini file...NOT in the rotated direction. FastCargo

Hey Mike, If I wanted to use these tanks instead of the stock ones, do they have the same attach points? In other words, I just want to do a LOD substitution...that should work...right? FastCargo

Giddy up! FastCargo

Actually, I wonder if that's a side effect of their better formation station keeping. I notice now that when I tell my wingmen to get into a close formation...they do it RIGHT NOW (which all good wingies do) even from fairly long distances. FastCargo

Not my favorite, but Dick Jonas was doin' it long before Dos Gringos existed... I'm a Thud Pilot I love my plane It is my body I am its brain My Thunderchief loves me And I love her too But I get the creeps With only one seat And one engine too She's faster than lightning It says on her dials To get a Thud airborne Takes only two miles She's packed with transistors Black boxes, diodes But stay alert 'cause you might get hurt When she explodes She totes more bombs Than a B Seventeen My F One Oh Five Has a gun and she's mean But there is one thing That curdles my blood It's lonesome up there Alone in the air In my single seat Thud I love my Thud And she loves me too But she soaks up flak Like a magnet can do If I get my hundred And I'm still alive I'll have no grief Goodbye, Thunderchief My F One Oh Five FastCargo

Nope...there is no .LOD exporter for any program other than 3ds max. FastCargo

Gmax is free...and is closet in functionality (interface, etc) to 3ds max. Blender is an open source 3d program...Flying Toaster uses it to make excellent 3d models (Mirage Factory F-8, A-7, F-15s to name a few). FastCargo

Kei nagase's skin skills ROCK! He should get credit for this screenshot... In final beta testing. Assuming nothing weird, I hope to have this one out before the end of the weekend. FastCargo

Well, if you can afford it, yes. It's almost always more expensive (with insurance) to own a second car as a gas-sipper vs just using a single truck. Typically where you see such vehicles are cities with lots of agriculture industries around, lots of small business owners (trucks are EXTREMELY useful for that), etc. Where Vampyre took that picture for instance, that particular city I'd say trucks outnumber all other vehicles combined...but that particular city has a LOT of ranches, construction, etc. You wouldn't drive such a vehicle regularly in a city like New York, Boston, etc. Trucks are very useful at times...I couldn't live without mine for about 2 years after we moved. We found we were constantly using it for stuff where nothing else would work. FastCargo

If MHT would get some longer layover's, I'd probably try to bid there more...I like it up there in the summer. FastCargo

That's not on a fighter is it? That looks like a BUFF wing... FastCargo

I used to have one of those in black. Over here it was called the Lexus SC300 which I had to order special because I wanted the stick. I really liked that car...and it was drop dead beautiful for all of the 1 minute it stayed clean after a good detailing. But I'll never buy a black car again...too high maintenance. I'd love another Lexus however...cars built like vaults and fantastic customer service. FastCargo

C5, There is NO WAY I would own a car like your in Memphis...you're a brave man my friend. I drive an ugly truck...perfect vehicle for Memphis...especially if I need to go to 'ramming speed' because someone wants to cut me off to get me to stop and jack my wallet (yep, it's happened to a few of our pilots). FastCargo

Phase 3 is payware, 1 and 2 are freeware. I get the feeling Phase 3 is everything. You don't live in Syracuse do ya? FastCargo

NYC or NY in general? FastCargo