Jump to content


  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About Crater

  1. Iranian Torpedo

    I agree with SEagle on several points that he mentions... Depth perception, do you think the Iranian Navy has it? That is a true statement and that is why the schmiran wasn't a big concern to the brass. They were more concerned about its impact on large surface vessels from a fast moving surface contact. Less concerned with the hypothetical threat to only submarines that you describe in your post. Once launched the torpedo has very limited guidance on a horizontal plane and much less vertically. For most Navies (except one) the tech isn't there yet. I agree and disagree, there are subs that work with battlegroups and subs that don't. Plain and simple for all the reasons that you mention. I wouldn't want to command a sub attached to a battlegroup, who would? Subs on patrol are rarely continuously attached to a battlegroup unless considered necessary. They are alternated during patrols to cover the battlegroups movements. Crater
  2. Holy Forcefield! Batman

    Wish I had that for my motorcycle in traffic! BTW, it works... the RPG is no more. Just wait, more on the way.
  3. hey guys... i'm going away for a week

    Keep that weapon clean!
  4. Iranian Torpedo

    Thought this was a good read... http://www.military.com/forums/0,15240,93859,00.html Crater
  5. When Modders go Mad

    Duh...Duh...Duh...Duh..Duh..Duh.Duh.Duh...Duh. Jaws

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..