Jump to content

cgold

SENIOR MEMBER
  • Content count

    375
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by cgold

  1. Super Hornets are just the same planes with the same avionics but in an airframe that will kept the politicians happy. Tomcats are faster, more powerful, "see" farther, and hit targets even farther away. If somebody "built" a Super Tomcat 21 for SFp1, I, PERSONALLY, will ruin the Super Hornet, any day. " Fighter Pilots make movies. Bomber Pilots make history. Strike Pilots get on the History Channel. " The F-14 fits ALL three! Can anybody tell me when an F-18 was in a movie where it wasn't shot down? Where it made history? Or where it made it on the History Channel?
  2. Haulin' ass and kickin' ass!
  3. "Is this your idea of fun Mav?" My computer will not let me post anything in the gallery section, so i figured I'll do this the easy way.
  4. Tomcat Fans

    Kick ass !!! Tomcats forever!
  5. I have two general questions that I have been meaning to ask. 1.) When is Marcelo gonna release the Frogfoots and new Flankers? I have been looking every day and it kills me that they still are not there. Release date= Please be soon! 2.) The Hawk SAM missile was integrated onto two Tomcats that Iran had back in 1979. From what I have read, and seen, they have NOT pursued this project, I think. Is there any way to make the Hawk an Air 2 Air Missile, or integrate it onto F-14's in SFp1? That would kinda cool if that were possible.
  6. When I saw your MiG pack, I began to wonder, "Maybe I can ask him." You, I take it, like Russian and former Soviet aircraft. I love them as much as Tomcats. I was wondering if you had plans to make any new MiGs like the MiG-31, or others like the Tu-160, Tu-95, Tu-128 "Fiddler", or any I forgot. More MiGs = usually more targets. USUALLY... not all the time. PS.= A J-8 II "Finback" Pack would really cool. Or an Q/A-5 attacker.
  7. The F-14D is the king of all bad ass! Lol
  8. I saw on wrench's website that he had a preview of the hangar screens of the Su-24 and Su-25. Any ideas on a release date?
  9. Marcelo, you are Sukhoi for StrikeFighters. You have produced the Su-27 that was a huge success. You now are working on the Su-24, and 25. You rule, dude!
  10. I know I am pro-F-14, but I think that the F-22 is a good substitute. Any idea on a release date?
  11. I have noticed that to. Even some very accurate missiles from the Russians miss their targets. Many of the US built planes have a chaff and flare despenser somewhere on the plane. That is the most likely cause. Some Soviet/Russian aircraft have ECM like this, but only recent airframes have them. (MiG-27, MiG-29, Su-17, Su-27, and some MiG-21's, and MiG-23's.) It's is a good thing then that the guns on Russian planes are such a big millimeter!
  12. I see that somebody has the guts to make the Super Tomcat. The engine nozzles at the back need to be, for a lack of a better word, "squarer", not round like the Pratt and Whitneys. Also, don't forget the double light pod under the nose. Otherwise, the F-14 you are making is the B version. Still, I think the Super tomcat projct is coming up to scratch. Rock on, dude!
  13. I know that the MiG-23BN/-27 was exported to some degree. The only skins for the MiG-27 are the ones for USAFMTL. These are good and all, but there are no Iraqi MiG-23BN/-27 skins, no Syrian (for USAFMTL's model), no Algerian, and so on. When it's all said and done, it's just more targets that are "politically correct" for good ol' Maverick to shoot down.
  14. Sweet, guys. Thanks for the feedback!
  15. The F-14's I already have Air to Ground capability. Is somebody making a General-Electric engined F-14? "If it says "Pratt and Whintey" on the engines, it damn well say "Martin Baker" on the Ejection Seats."
  16. You have a good point, but the airframe is still the F-14A. Don't get me wrong, I love all F-14's, but the best one of them all is the F-14D. I was wondering if somebody was creating the new airframe, with GE engines, the double camera/light pod, and better avionics.
  17. The F-14's out now are just modified F-14A's. Who will actually make one? The F-14A is good and all, but the Super Tomcat is the king of all bad-ass. The A+ is the same way.
  18. Are the Russians really let the US run them over in SFp1? The Soviets are working mostly on 60's and 70's aircraft. Mostly. The are the few exceptions where there is the Su-17, Su-27, MiG-29, and MiG-27. Are there MiG-31's, Su-30's, 33's, 35's, 24's 25's, and 37's coming out ? The Russians better pick it up, or the Middle East will be quieter than it should be.
  19. Typhiod, you have done an incredible job with your F-14's. You've gotten plenty of views, and even more downloads. I bet the F-14 is a very hard plane to make due to its swing-wing capability, and complexity as an aircraft. I have already modified the original F-14A to carry Air to Ground weaponry. It kicks ass! I was just curious to see if a real F-14A+, B or D was in the works.
  20. Kick ass! The Gripen is THE new weapon of the 21st century.
  21. mig29-08.jpg

    The feared and respected fighter of the East.
  22. mig29-08.jpg

    The feared and respected fighter of the East.
  23. Older Soviet Aviation is just as interesting as the newer airframes. Su-7 Su-9, and the Su-17. I am surprised that newer Russian aircraft have not ben created. The Su-22, 24, 27, or 37 for that matter. MiGs too! MiG 27, 29, 31, or 1.44 MFI. More MiGs or Sukhoi's = more targets or allies. you choose.
  24. Is there some way that the WOE MiG-27 can be edited to fly in SFp1? More MiGs= More targets!
  25. Flying with the enemy is not always moral, but "Knoweth thy enemy", right?
×

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..