Jump to content

Murphy'S

SENIOR MEMBER
  • Content count

    586
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Murphy'S

  1. What do You think about the 3 screenshots about sf2 Europe posted on Facebook ?
  2. But there will be progress!!! i'm pretty sure (i can bet on it) we'll get a multitargeting air to air radar mode for example. But my feeling is some people (and in fact a lot of them i guess) want things like MFD and very modern stuff (kind of lomac with moddability of the Sf séries) but we must not forget that the most advanced year covered do not go beyond 1983 (air-air loadout83 for the f-15 eagle) and we can't ask to go beyond before the 60's and 70's being well covered. And there we can ask for few things 1) lockable ground radar mode (but did it exist in the 60's and 70's? and to what extent?) 2) slewable maverick/LGB (those missiles/bombes became common in the 70's all the rest must be focused on gameplay/terrain/ai and that's it.....and when all this things being accomplished we'll have get the ultimate fly sim of the 60's-70's (and maybe 50's if TK goes korea down the road)
  3. i thought the very same thing.
  4. i guess (and it's only a guess) the prowler will be useful since TK introduce in the game(from some times now) some parameters linked to electronic warfare/jamming/frequencies. for this one, honnestly, since TK already introduced the TWS mode with f-15, i'm not worried about there will be a multi-targeting mode introduced for the f-14 this is a good question, how will it be used by the game engine? THIS is a good and big question, how will the game handle the carriers in the futur? (destructability of carriers is only a part of it)
  5. back to the main subject
  6. ho it's not a matter of being a fanboy (the short way to close a path in a discussion) but just to enjoy communication when given, since we all know that thirdwire is not known to be too communicative, and not make those who give to us running into a more damaging silence.
  7. DanW never been so precise (he can't, unless TK decide to do so).
  8. me too, what a mess....
  9. sure be ironic will help :mda:
  10. and here it is, too much empty turmoil leads to that, after TK bashed so much on simhq that he kept silence until he opened it's own forum. and now danW who gave us some informations (even if scarces ones) and make some communication get fed up and quit this board people never learn lessons from the past thanks guys :mda: the same thing which happened on simhq with TK years agoo take place now and here with danW pfff.....
  11. the game is probably advanced enough to show us some stuff, and he want to give us some news since the first pics are almost 2 years old. and personnaly i thanks him to do so.
  12. ???? what did he said?
  13. totally agree with this statement, let's things come to us and then judge. (and don't forget DanW sentance, "this game will rule", which(i guess ) in thirdwire language could mean this new game will go much much further than any sf series game go to date without reaching the level of a flamming cliff)
  14. how about an alternative scenario like "ormuz strait blocade 85"? like this you can see f-14/a-7E/A-6 et so on just a idea
  15. the f-14 sim is now on devellopemnt for two years we'll see what happen and i don't think it will take another two years before it hit the online store (from a business view not fan view)
  16. IMHO the way the carrier are used today will change in the f-14 sim, otherwise it will be strange to see a battle in north atlantic without materialize the old dream of seeing hordes of soviets tu-95/tu22/tu16 assaulting carriers groups and sinking them from a point of view and defend them from the another one. (and don't forget the position of carrier in the vietnam campaign in recent patchs, the carriers groups already appears in a way)
  17. someone post a list a new object in a .ini and there is a bunch of new ships directly related to the north atlantic theme
  18. yeah i was i kind of spy in a previous life but obviously not good enough to penetrate thirdwire defences
  19. What we need at this point (to improve moral i guess ) is some screenshots of what is coming so please DanW Show us some stuff
  20. :grin: just tought these two opinion wherever they are written sums up some feeling about lack of communcation from tk (but it's not new) amongst the community.
  21. When i read this and this it seems that we, people who like TK's, work crave for for something new (and even if we bought (at least for me) most of the DLC (11 of the total for me)) maybe it's time for Thirdwire to (at least) just post some screenshots of what we are all waiting for. ps: for me DLC aren't waste of effort, some of them are very interesting i think.
  22. no crash reported here with the october patch with win7 64bit a core2duo E8400@3.28ghz 3go of ram a radeon 4870 with 512mo catalyst 11.2
  23. is it a new tornado model not available yet?
  24. I'm not stuck to one year But to answer my favorite time span is 1962 to 1982-1984
×

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..