kukulino

It is not correct version. It is old version. You need Weaponeditor which comes with Jul2006 weapons pack I think. I checked your Weapondata.ini and it looks like you have it from Jul2006 Weps pack (your 2049th weapon in order is LAU-131/A (IR Flare) Rocket Pod ----- the same like in Jul2006 Weapondata.ini, plus you have added two Trident missiles). Donno if Jul2006 weaponeditor was uploaded separately. Or unpack Weps pack Jul2006 into new folder and use its weaponeditor and guneditor. Maybe it will be better reinstall Jul2006 weps pack. I do not know what happend with your Jul2006 Weaponeditor (if I am correct and you have Jul2006 weps pack installed). PS: check your PM :yes:

I use two ways how change values in Weapondata.ini As totally first: I suppose you have Jul2006 weps pack installed and you have set Weaponeditor compatibility for Win95/98 in its properties. What I mean with compatibility --- see this link: http://forum.combatace.com/index.php?showtopic=12210 As totally second: copy Weapondata.ini and Weapondata.dat into safe place as backup. If you will make some wrong steps in edit, you can use backupped files. Than: First way... - open Weponadata.ini (with Notepad for example) and search for needed weapon, which you want edit - when you find it, edit values you need - close Weapondata.ini and let save changes - open Weapondata.ini with weaponeditor and hit button "SAVE" - close Weaponeditor Second way: - open Weapondata.ini with Weaponeditor - find weapon which you want edit and make needed edit - hit "SAVE" button - close Weaponeditor Second way is better for editing existing weapons. First way is good for adding new weapons from new add on packs. That is all.

There are four versions in the pack. 3xUSAF and 1xSpanish. Full pack size ---- 765mb!!! No missiles or guns Well, recce plane Can not say more. You must try :yes:

Donno what exactly means that "F" on gunsight. But you can see it here for example: There were serial numbers painted on gunsights on our Migs too and I saw soviet star somewhere on photo too. According to this site HERE! Mig-21MA is: - based on Mig-21R version ("R" was based on PFM version) - it is original Mig-21M version - "Znamja Truda" factory specified this version as "Izdelije 96A". In aircrafts documentation were planes specified as "Mig-21M, variant A." Fact is that czechoslovak Mig-21M was called Mig-21MA. And it is still called MA. - planes were delivered with R-11F2S-300 engines - there were no cannon deflectors and no periscopes on canopies on MA version - later were all MAs upgraded on MF standard ---- installed R-13F-300 engine, cannon deflectors, pericopes - it is hard see differece between upgraded MA and MF versions in external view. But you can see different airbrakes shape. For me the best difference method (for our MAs) are their serial nums. SFP1 world: - MA is using stock Mig-21MF 3D model - cannon deflectors and periscope are not visible on our model, so this represents (together with R-11F2S-300) earlier MA - our upgraded MA to MF standard looks same like standard stock MF - serial nums are for MAs of course. Gerald made some new things in avionics and "HUD" and new FM - new MAs have new skins, as you can see in Geralds screenies - earlier MA represents standard M version for other users (need some changes in NationName and AttachmentType) New feature for Mig-21MA in SFP1 world: - our MA is equiped with aditional installation, which allows carry ECM SM SPS-141 pod, with ASO-2I dispensers. This mean that MA will be much safer in A2G attacks than standard MF model. SM SPS-141 was designed to "jame" Hawk radars. - not all MAs were eguiped with needed electric installation in Czechoslovak AF. But all our MAs can carry SPS-141 in SFP1/WOE so little advantage for us - with adiotional eletric installation were equiped some Czechoslovak Mig-21MF series too. So if you want use it on standard MF you need make some ini edits in Mig-21MF_data.ini and loadout.ini So this is short summary :yes:

Hallo Gerald :yes: Here is little czechoslovak Mig-21MA database: http://forum.valka.cz/index.php/f/502299 But not all MAs are with photos there. I sent you this link maybe. The dog looks smaller according photos: It is bit bigger than that "little doors" under the dog. Another MA shots with dog: http://www.abpic.co.uk/photo/1081853/ http://forum.valka.cz/attachments/10659/1112-e2_P7061984.JPG Numbers on your MA skins are older version. I sent you newer version made from Mig-21F font. But maybe you like this older version. So if you want try those newer nums and you haven't got them, let me know. On camo Mig skins (those with and without yellow strip on the tail) I miss dark strip on the nose. But I am not sure it was on real plane there. On the other hand this little dark strip was standard on many Mig-21 versions. Cockpit looks very nice Skins looks very nice All MA looks very nice So... Perfect Thank you

Ahoj :yes: Tu je dobry link, ako Fubar512 pridal "dzwięki" do Soundlist.ini http://forum.combatace.com/index.php?showtopic=30451&hl= Mne to pomohlo :yes:

:pioneer:

Hi gerald! Good news you have And nice avatar too I have question for modders: Is it easier make rivets and panel lines in 3D program on model? I have hear yes, it is easier. Made new panel lines and rivets on "clear" BMP in paint program is bit problematic I think. Similar with make camo scheme (this is hard, but possible. Tooks me five days, but looks good. I made cca 100 test screeshots ). What do you think guys?

I tried reskin your J-5 model. This is original fuselage: This is my try. I tried make some rivets for test on J-5: This is test skin on J-5 in game. Rivets are deformated: I tried paint engine section too: But when I painted needed part with needed colour, this new painted map was showed on fuselage too, not just in engine. I tried resize that my paint "map", but no success. I haven't got screenie, becouse I deleted it some time ago. I discussed this with my friends, modders, and conclusion was that I can not make good skin, becouse problem is in model mapping. I can not change this, so I did not tried make newer and nicer skins for J-5, becouse it is not possible, I am afraid. So I agree with streakeagle in this his opinion: "Keep making whatever it is you like for whatever reasons." Nobody can not stop you post here what you want, of course. It is gift from you to community and I personally THANK YOU for your work. I do not agree with streakeagle in this (If streakeagle meas me too. But I think it was in nobody mind too): "Don't let anyone discourage you because your interests don't fit into their agenda... Unless they want to pay you and you accept their offer of payment." Becouse something like that was not in my mind. I apologize to YOU fallout3, if my words were not clear in previous posts. My english is not the best so some my formulations are not clear sometimes (maybe often ) . I am sorry if I discourage you. But similar, when I released some my skins or ini tweaks or other things (not so hard like 3D modding in general), poeple said me good work - if it was good, or good work... but... you have some problematic parts in your mods. Than I looked into my mods, discussed with friends about problem, and if it was needed, we changed problematic parts. So I tried make skin for your J-5 (you wanted this from us), but looks like only you (as J-5 modder) can change that problematic parts on fuselage on your model. Problematic mapping was noticed with more poeple, so It is needed say you about this problem, if we can not fix it. So this was hidden in sence of my sentence posted upper: "So I am looky forward to new Mig-19. Hope it will be much better than previous J-5 model and better than stock Mig-19S." Hope you understand me now. Keep your good work for community. Good luck in mods. I am looky forward especially to Sukhoi models. According to screenies looky very nice :spartak: Cheers Ľubo

Thank you for explanation :yes: But I still think that my GF is crazy

I am sorry for my unclear formulation I mean this. Ship in WOE: Carrier in WOE/WOV: Both ships are moving, but carrier is missing that "white tail" on the water. As I said, my card is crazy sometimes, so if nobody has noticed this, it means that I have problem with that lovely card.

Thank you too. Nice little tweak :yes:

Yeah Occam's razor :yes: It is not necessary have many same things. But we can have many similar things ---- Mig-21F/F-13/F-13CZ for example. And there is one famous Mig-21 version "forgotten" by modders in SFP1 world: Mig-21FL (Type 77 in Indian license). Usable in India-Pakistan conflicts and in Israel-Arab too. I know that there was this version made by Howling I think and updated by Wrench, but as Wrench wrote, it was ini edit, not new 3D model. Just suggestion :yes:

If this new model will be better than stock one, my choice is clear :yes: We have much higher standard in models quality than anytime before. Old stock Mig models need replace I think. Mig-21F was "replaced" by Mirage factory F/F-13/F-13CZ, stock Mig-21PFM with skin from Mirage factory is on much higher standard. Stock Mig-21MF with hi res skins looky good too. Mig-17, Mig-19, Mig-21PF/PFV need some help. So I am looky forward to new Mig-19. Hope it will be much better than previous J-5 model and better than stock Mig-19S. Good luck :yes:

My GF 7600GT is crazy too sometimes. I have feeling shot her through the window... Closed window, of course Is in your game white clue when ship is treveling? I have it there sometimes and sometimes no (WOE). In WOV I have no white clue. I have older drivers. Newer were problematic. But I can try newest... On weekend... Limited downloading per month

So new modder incoming? Congrats/Gratulujem :yes:

Zdar všetkým! CA_Stary vypustil do sveta ďalšie dva packy. Enhanced Explosions 3 effects pack: http://forum.combatace.com/index.php?autoc...p;showfile=6953 Pre SFP1/WoV/WoE/WoI A OTC 2 Cuba tree mod: http://forum.combatace.com/index.php?autoc...p;showfile=6954 Pre Operation Tainted Cigar Version 2.0 (Kubánska kríza) OTC 2 si stiahnite tu (pravda ak nemáte): http://forum.combatace.com/index.php?autoc...p;showfile=3873 http://forum.combatace.com/index.php?autoc...p;showfile=3874 Mal som možnosť testovať beta EE3 pack, a môžem ho vrelo doporučiť. Je naozaj parádny Dobrá práca Stary!!! Ako zvyčajne :good: Dzieki Przemku! ĎAKUJEME

Ouuuha!!! Stary!!! Do you want kill us??? You know how make great mods greater... This is exactly what SFP1 missing in its world :yes:

Tak sa nám pretrhlo vrece s dobrými modmi http://forum.combatace.com/index.php?autoc...p;showfile=6996 Netestol som zatial, ale usudzujem, že je to dobrá vec z videí a screenshotov. Kto by vedel viac, mohol by hodit par slov či je to fakt také dobré ako sa javí :yes:

WaaaaAAAA!!!! I must go to school, so I can not try it now Heeeeelp!!!!

Personally I do not like what ifs, especially fictional planes But if it is possible, so why do not make them BTW, all campaigns in WOE for example are what if, so they are fictional. This what if scenario looks good to me :yes: And small deck is danger for plane, but it is possible land on it in SFP1 series world, of course. If somebody like some reality and want land just in cockpit view, it is really controlled crash... Happy landing on small carrier deck depends on good method. Various planes have various pits in SFP1 series (Thanx to God and modders). Skyhawk has ideal view from cockpit, Crusaders view from pit is not so good. I tried many times put Crusader on small deck. The only safe way was hit key for "remove" cockpit, and see just gunsight reticle... Than was happy landig But I like some reality, so tried put him on deck with standard cockpit view. After dozen crashes I concluded, that good method is: landing from curve. Crazy formulation, but my english is not best. This is example. Actor. F4U Corsair (bit different from F-8 ) http://br.youtube.com/watch?v=idfFUQEPwgg&...feature=related You can see carrier deck from Crusader cockpit longer than in classic landing (so easy with Skyhawk). Still danger, but good adrenaline after exciting mission :yes:

Hey Stary, thanx for another green "hell" Looks fantastic again And "girls at the university"? I have this problem solved too

Any news about awaited Korean terrain repaint, tree mod and enhanced target pack, please?

Thank you too! I just want note that I had those files as TGAs not BMPs in my install.

Oh, yes, study :yes: But students life is so sweet