squid

1. What A2G ordnance except dumb bombs can F-15C carry ? (not only USAF, but also IDF, Saudi etc) 2. Can the F-15C CFT pylons take A2G payload ? 3. Can F-15C use targeting / navigation pods ? if so what stations are they loaded on ?

From what i know all C (USAF, IDF, etc) had defacto CCIP and they were certified for dumb bombs. I think this wasnt the case with the A (unless upgraded to C) . I am more particularly curious for details concerning the extend of A/G capabilities of single seater Eagles. How much possible is it for example that there are C (IDF probably) that carry similar configuration to E ( CFTs, Pod(s) attached to CFT pylon (or under intake?), Guided munitions, Pod imagery projected to HUD capability (i doubt it ofcourse) , if stock MFD is used for pod imagery etc etc)

not in a CFT station like the -E?

Can they use targeting / navigation pods? ....

Can you imagine though TK releasing NA Saturday ?

i dig this scheme

RAF hotness Is that Brain32's Euro Terrain ? Stary you released a viewlist,ini ?

Stary, Kulbit ... just awesome ...... wallpaper stuff .... Ravenclaw, Awesome swiss mirage ....... Soulfreak, Gina always rocks ..........

Hmmm High Level Forum ....

a freudian slip :P :D

I havent been able to follow this hangout, so pardon if it has been mentioned already : i guess 57th FIS (F-15C ?) is going to be included in SF3? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/57th_Fighter-Interceptor_Squadron

you mean peeks of Air Combat Maneuvering Panel, Horizontal Situation Display indicator, Vertical Display Indicator , windshield projected HUD ? (i've always wanted to post this icon)

"loads of screenshots can mean only one thing: delay" - Governor Rio Bibble

i think i will befriend the troll

i just over-Geed its left wing off

nostalgia lol is maybe a WOE conversion to SF2 in your plans too ?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yj_kwq-q3dg ( talking about Jane's USAF, )

Ofcourse . I am sure though that avionics improvements will always come from TK in one way, level, interval or another (like they have been so far). And even at this stage avionics (and other functions / features) are right now, which are good enough fun (not that i am not expecting advances in that field too like everybody) "I would be more than pleasantly surprised if TK provided a mission playback feature" . Just wishing, only for the you-never-know sake. Its just unfortunate i don't belong to the vast majority I will never tho stop expressing that can't help it missing the neat Jane's USAF record / playback feature, and since SF has replaced Jane's USAF in my installed sims, its just here i would express that. Doesn't mean i will complain or act like someone promised it (while the contrary), just wishing & please just don't pay attention

i dare to disagree too. what is of Importance is totally subjective here. I should had explained also better that i was not refering to gigabytes of avi recording (ofcourse could use FRAPS or any other of the many good tools out there to video record anything) but the playback Falcon4 and ED provides. Full 3D & timeline controllable debrief style replay. And even in the case of movie making, replaying this way gives you the option to change cameras and angles and thus have proper access to a played flight / mission to properly enjoy making a movie. (its also awesome to my view that players can share tracks ... and this is '98 technology) For some, its very important to have their moding lives made easier. They get their kicks by moding. TK has shown he understands that and takes it seriously into consideration so he has been providing improvements & tools for modders. Others get their kicks for example making movies. To me personally and subjectively all the expected improvements are kind of equal weight no matter the field. For example If TK won't give me playback or better environment i will just appreciate and have fun with what other improvements he provided and just keep on asking politely (i am not the only client ofcourse) Personally i spend alot of time and find it totally fun replaying missions (or game sessions in general, in any kind of simulation, eg driving) and view them from a third person perspective, pausing, changing cameras, angles, check what was going on in the theatre, on the targets and other areas at the time of the X event, or how the y event looked from a specific aspect , setting up screenshots etc I don't see why my taste of fun is less important than other clients

( talking about environment http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_VTazV7Mizg&feature=youtu.be )

i'd expect with the naval focus unavoidably this title's subject implies that decent naval operations elements like that will be implemented, also considering the overall improvements we had a peek at so far and the time spent on working on this title, things like working CIWS at least . just guessing tho can't wait for the Final Countdown mod :D :P

i'd pay anything for major changes and improvements in SF2. Especially in environment. Thats where my own personal interest is. Environment & Graphics. in terms of avionics and systems i trust TK no matter how much realism he adds, when he does it, that the end result is still gaming friendly and not overwhelming realistic. . ( btw Mission recorder / playback please ! :D ) (FC2. I just love it too. its just great beautiful product. Nice mix of lite and fun glimpse of real. The "feel & look" of the red ones ,the least, has a "real" feeling (with all those nice physics they have a good tradition in ED). What frustrates me with ED products is performance complications ALWAYS .... after all those years its over my head anymore, i really cant and dont want to deal with the chaos of tweaks and trials / errors i always end up mess up with regarding FC / FC2/ A-10C to achieve proper framerates and have enough of the offered eyecandy , NO MATTER the capacity of my hardware ..... *sigh*. pure waste of precious time. .Another field i appreciate from SF : install, setup few graphics from game menu, off you go!

yey at last

Przemek i am curious about those corsairs condition