tiopilotos

An another great cockpit by Stary! Is there any Yak-28P flight model in DL sections? I made a quick search and didn't find something. Suppose it could be in NatoFighters pack.

Starfighters taking off !

Excellent work Enoc! Do you plan to release the latest Su-17M3/M4 models along with the export (Su-22) versions?

Foxbats... Mig-25PU Mig-25BM

Sukhoi Su-7BM "Fitter" - Hellenic Air Force, 1968

At high altitude Flying inverted Draken go high!

Have this problem for long time but don't know what causes this. Some aircrafts such as Mirage IIICZ (by ludo) or the Mirage 5D (by paulopanz) appear with two external fuel tanks by default even though I haven't selected them in the loadout menu. Mirage IIICZ appears with two 625 drop tanks and Mirage 5D appears with two 1300 drop tanks by default. The point is that in the loadout menu I don't select them (empty center station) plus they can not be jettison. An another problem is that only stock Libyan Mirage 5D fuel tank skin appears normal. Fuel tanks for EAFCamo or LARAFCamo2 are completely black. Any ideas? Thanks.

PVO Su-9 "Fishpot-A" Firing the IR version of AA-1 "Alkali"

Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-21MF - Hellenic Air Force, 1975

Repaint of FAPA Mig-21bis

Mikoyan-Gurevich Mig-21SMP - Soviet Air Defense Forces (PVO), 1971 Since the introduction of the Mig-23M along with the R-23 (AA-7 Apex) missile was about to take place around 1973-74, it was decided in 1968 that a fighter with medium range missile capability and with performance comparable to Mig-21S, should enter service. Existing PVO aircrafts such as Su-11, Su-15 or Yak-28P could carry R-98 (AA-3 Anab) missile but they were dedicated interceptors with poor maneuverability. PVO decided that a Mig-21 version with the ability to carry R-98 should be built. At the time, Mig-21S to Mig-21SM upgrading process had already started. The main aspect of the whole project was the radar compatibility with the missile and Mig-21SM was equipped with RP-22 (Sapfir-22) radar which could not cooperate with R-98. An improved radar was in need and it was decided that RP-22 should be upgraded to be compatible with the missile. When the first Mig-21SM aircrafts became operational in 1969, it was decided that a number of Mig-21SMs will be further upgraded with the addition of the new radar. Work on radar began in 1969 using a Mig-21PFM as a testbed. The new radar was the RP-22P with maximum search range at 28 km and maximum track range at 14 km against a fighter size target, performance which was considered good enough for PVO requirements. R-98 was much heavier than the R-13 (AA-2 Atoll) and the Mig-21SMs that would carry the missile got back to the factory to strengthen their underwing resistance. In 1971 the RP-22P was ready and fitted to Mig-21SM. The airframes which were fitted with the new radar became known as Mig-21SMP.

Flying lower than 1500 ft in SF2 means that you're quite safe from SAM threats (not MANPDAS). Maybe you can be tracked but there will be no missile launch. In most SAMs minimum track altitude is set to 100m or 300m but these limits seem that don't work. You can actually fly at 400m (~1300 ft) but still no launch or even no tracking. Any ideas on how to lower this limit, so that a SAM radar can track and launch a missile at lower altitude?

Short range SAMs like SA-13 or SA-15 indeed can engage enemy aircraft at very low altitudes but do you get a launch at 500 ft from SA-2, SA-3 or SA-6 ?

Mikoyan-Gurevich Mig-23MF "Flogger-B" - Hellenic Air Force, 1984

Dassault Mirage F.1CJ