-
Content count
3,749 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
7
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Gallery
Downloads
Store
Everything posted by 33LIMA
-
-
From the album Steel armor - Blaze of War
-
Steel Armor Blaze of War/SABOW - Iranian Chieftains through M60 TC's binos
33LIMA posted a gallery image in Member's Albums
From the album Steel armor - Blaze of War
-
This is my favourite - the 'List of Un-natural Laws', starting with the classic: Muprhy's Law If something can go wrong, sooner or later it will. O'Tools Commentary on Murphy's law Murphy was an optimist. The Unspeakable Law As soon as you mention something, if it's good, it goes away; if it's bad, it happens. The Non-reciprocal Laws of Expectations Negative expectations yield negative results. Positive expectations yield negative results. Howe's Law Every man has a scheme that will not work. Zymurgy's First Law of Evolving Systems Dynamics Once you open a can of worms, the only way to re-can them is to use a larger can. Etorre's Observation The other line/queue moves faster. Skinner's Constant (aka Finnegan's Finagling Factor) That quantity which, when multiplied by, divided by, added to, or subtracted from the answer you got, gives you the answer you should have got. Maier's Law If the facts do not conform to the theory, they must be disposed of. Hoare's Law of Large Problems Inside every large problem is a small problem struggling to get out. Boren's First Law When in charge, ponder. When in trouble, delegate. When in doubt, mumble. The Golden Rule of Arts and Science Whoever has the gold, makes the rules. The Law of Selective Gravity The chance of the bread falling with the buttered side down is directly proportional to the cost of the carpet. Barth's Distinction There are two types of people: those who divide people into two types, and those who don't. Segal's Law A man with one watch knows what time it is. A man with two watches is never sure. Ninety-Ninety Rule of Project Schedules The first 90% of the task takes 90% of the time. The last 10% takes the other 90%.
-
Albatros windscreen question...
33LIMA replied to Hauksbee's topic in WOFF UE/PE - General Discussion
Agreed! By how much is hard to say, though. I just spent a few minutes in a 2nd hand bookshop browsing 'Letters of a Flying Officer' published in 1928 and of the three or four combat accounts I speed-read. one had an Albatros (sorry!) whose left upper wing folded back and sheared off after an attack. What is WILDLY overdone in RoF is the common disappearance, generally from battle damage, of the complete set of Albatros interplane bracing wires, often on both sides simultaneously, which affects both the V-strutted versions. From this... ...to this... - in a heartbeat. Kind of counter-immersive, even if it is a visible warning to go easy (you'll have noticed the R.E.8 about to...you guessed, shed a wing). -
Albatros windscreen question...
33LIMA replied to Hauksbee's topic in WOFF UE/PE - General Discussion
Not me - I find I'm generally looking over the top of the (smaller? Higher stock eyepoint?) RoF Albatros windshield - D.III OAW illustrated, prior to narrowly missing departing Tripehound wings 'n things on a recent PWCG campaign outing... ...though I'd forgotten the same sim's D.V version was a lot bigger, been a while... -
BEST of WoFF - WORST of WoFF (planes, that is)
33LIMA posted a topic in WOFF UE/PE - General Discussion
Just to see if we can kick up a bit of a ruckuss here, what are your most and least favourite planes, in WoFF? Either flying in, or flying with or against. Some ground rules.... 1. No griping - this is about the planes as you find them in WoFF, not a place for FM grumbles or dark mummerings about the correct number of barbs in Flashar's dragon's tail. 2. Posts should have a favourite and a non-favourite - preferably with one WoFF screenshot of each - and reason(s), rational or not; observations on other people's choices are welcome. 3. Feel free to post one pair of choices for each side. I'll get this started. For the Luftstreitkrafte, my 'most favourite' is probably the Albatros D.V, which fact, combined with my earlier reference, gives me just the excuse I need to sneak in an extra screenshot of the aforementioned Jasta 5 bird... ...but for now, I'm leaning towards the even sleeker Pfalz D.III... Reasons? Good looks, made a lasting impression from the Blue Max movie, and available 'skins' are only slightly less colourful than the Albatrosses. Plus she's less likely to make those creaking, crunching sounds which tell you something important has broken or fallen off. Least favourite - the 'flying razor blade'. Why? Well, let's see now. What's the Fokker D.VIII/E.V got? Good looks? Nope. High speed? 'Fraid not. Agility? Hmmm...not really, in my hands anyway. Good all-round view from the cockpit? Not if you like to see what's above and ahead of you, which I tend to prefer. So, who are your WoFF saints and sinners? -
From the album Combat Sims
-
Got him! Rise of Flight, Richard Stachel Jasta 2 campaign
33LIMA posted a gallery image in Member's Albums
From the album Combat Sims
-
BEST of WoFF - WORST of WoFF (planes, that is)
33LIMA replied to 33LIMA's topic in WOFF UE/PE - General Discussion
I must say, I enjoyed my DH2 career...while it lasted, Probably, the fact it was about six months before Boelcke's lot showed up to spoil the party, had something to do with that. -
BEST of WoFF - WORST of WoFF (planes, that is)
33LIMA replied to 33LIMA's topic in WOFF UE/PE - General Discussion
Both 'No Parachute' and ''Open Cockpit' have been amongst my favourite WW1 aviation memoirs since I read library copies in the late 1960s. I recall Lee describing how on one occasion at high altitude their Pups 'boomed and zoomed' with complete impunity a flight of V-strutters which were hanging on their props and unable to get at the Pups at that height without exposing themselves and in the end just gave up. I'm not 'dissing' the Pup - in a campaign mission last night with just one companion, we ran into three of the little beggars over the lines. While my flight-mate claimed one of them, and I got hits on the one I was dancing with, they more or less ran rings around us and I was luck to get away with a dead stick forced landing and 6 days in hospital! I still prefer my Jasta 5 D.III, though, seen here before the patrol in question, and in flight on the way to our patrol area. -
BEST of WoFF - WORST of WoFF (planes, that is)
33LIMA replied to 33LIMA's topic in WOFF UE/PE - General Discussion
This is my idea of a 'beautiful flying' Pup: ...as in, one that won't be flying for much longer, seen from behind the guns of an Albatros :) -
From the album Steel armor - Blaze of War
-
From the album Steel armor - Blaze of War
-
BEST of WoFF - WORST of WoFF (planes, that is)
33LIMA replied to 33LIMA's topic in WOFF UE/PE - General Discussion
GK Merrill in vol.1 of his Jasta 5 history describes that inverted Albie as 2065/17, Richard Flashar's machine, as indicated by the Jastafuhrer white upper wing chevron, later flown by von Hippel as a reserve aircraft...at least until his famous 18 Feb 18 crash after losing the lower wing in combat and ending up as photographed. -
For many of us, I daresay our interest in the real machine started, or was spurred on, by a kit. In my case it was the Airfix D.V, as included with the Dogfight Double - neither it nor the Camel was a great replica but they were all we had, at pocket money 1/72 prices anyway (the more exotic Aurora 1/48 jobs were rarer as well as costlier)... ...then came the much better Revell D.III, again with dramatic box art, and moulded in overall red (IIRC my sample's plastic was a slightly darker shade)... Then came some books, this one being amongst the first, illustrating the famous AWM D.Va on the cover and inside, and providing annotated scale multi-views showing the variations with a decent level of detail. Not bad for the late 1960s... I don't think we have a skin for this machine in WoFF? ...but it seems I'm wrong...
-
First peep at a new mission for a new mod for an old tanksim! If anyone's been wondering what's stifled the flow of mission reports for several weeks, this is the answer. As in, working with Panzer Elite guru 'Brit 44' Aldo on a new mod for that sim. You may wonder why, precisely - pure nostalgia apart - anyone would want to put time and effort into a simulation first released about eighteen years ago. Well, the answer of course is that several people are, because good old 'PE' is still one of the very best tank simulators you can play today. As well as adding to the considerable scope and content of the original, several available mods improve the original rather brash, almost 'cartoony' graphics to the point they are still quite serviceable, if little competition in the eye candy stakes for newer products like the excellent Graviteam Steel Fury - Kharkov 1942 and Steel Armor - Blaze of War. Recent work has adopted the latest core code files developed by Aldo, known as PE-x, and which over time implemented a whole range of improvements ranging from accurate time of flight/ballistics with proper tracer effects, better tank and infantry AI, and better visuals including an extended maximum view range and fogging with distance. Slomo's PP2-x has been out for a while, and featured many much-improved tank models, like the US Sherman and German Panther pictured below. And just recently, Daskal released Ostpak Redux, a makeover of the full game to PE-x standards but also building in the famous Ostpak Eastern Front mod and other, additional campaigns which add the early Blitzkrieg of 1939-40 and the Western Desert to the original three stock campaigns - Tunisia, Italy and Normandy. Along with Michael Y's 'Monty v Rommel' mod, my PE favourite was always Britpack '44, which replaced the US Normandy kit with a very comprehensive set of British AFVs, soft-skins, guns and troops - heck, there was even a Sherman DD 'swimming' tank... Sadly, Britpack '44 never got updated to PE-x standards. But this work is now under way, with Aldo doing the heavy lifting/smart stuff, and myself trying to break it (aka testing) plus adding new missions. The original Britpack '44 - introduced with Panzer Elite Special Edition, 'PESE' to its friends, in 2001 - made minimal changes to the stock US Normandy missions, beyond replacing the US kit with British stuff. The battles were all US bocage ops from July-August 1944, complete with original 'briefings', usually given by what sounded like a private soldier from the Bronx irritatingly laying out the law to, or even chewing out, his superiors. Back in the day, I recorded a British Voice Pack, still available, so that at least once you were playing, you didn't have to pretend that you were in a Canadian unit every time. This time, while I am adapting the stock mission maps to save time, all the operations are entirey new, and feature realistic mission orders (incorrectly called 'briefings') delivered in an appropriate format and (except for single troop/platoon missions) given by your company commander to all his troop leaders, not just to the player. Apart from the first mission - there will be at least twelve - all are set during Operation Bluecoat, which was fought next to the US sector in Normandy and in similar bocage country, just a few miles east of the actual historical battlefields so accurately reproduced in the PE Normandy campaign. All I have done is re-label a few towns - and replace the 'cartoon' mission maps with the real c.1944 alternatives, scans of which were very helpfuly included by developers Wings Simulations with the project files in PESE. So instead of something like this... ...you get something like this... ...complete with the contours you need to be able to get a decent picture of the all-important lie of the land. You can see where I have crudely edited in new placenames to suit the mission, the map having been chosen to portray at least some of the topography relevant to the actual battles. And by 'actual battles' I mean that the missions - 'scenarios' in PE Speak - are, like the stock PE ones, scaled down or localised representations of actual historical actions. The original plan was to create a set following the career of an individual unit but as any tankie memoir will show you, they spent significant periods out of the line. So to fit in with Bluecoat's relatively short duration - and to showcase the variety of British vehicles available - I have settled for featuring different historical units. Unlike PE, which doesn't tell you which unit you're serving with, in my missions the player is an actual named participant in a named unit which fought in the real battle. For example, in 'Dickie's Bridge' you are Lt Dickie Powle of 2 HCR whose armoured car patrol famously secured the bridge he gave his name to, well behind German lines (porous as they were) on Day 2 of the operation. We don't have the correct Daimler Armoured and Scout Cars it's now known he used, but the Humber Armoured Car we do have makes a nice substitute, clad in modder and artist Geezer's fine, well-muddied textures. The first mission is 'South of Hill 112', whch I started on over 20 years ago (!) but gave up on getting working in the version of PE then available (well short of the PE-x we have now). Also a casualty back then was a planned 'Yankeepak' of additional US missions, which foundered in circumstaces now lost to fading memories. The first thing I did on retrning to the fray was fix Hill 112, which is still not perfect but now functions much more reliably, and as the sort of reasonably authentic portrayal of a real tank-infantry action that I thought PE's stock missions didn't represent terribly well, seeming to play out like a platoon drive in the countryside, rather than a proper company-level operation. After this scenario, the action switches to Bluecoat, at the end of July 1944, This was a much more successful operation than the famous and costly tank action of Operation Goodwood which preceeded it to the east of the Normandy bridgehead. Ian Daglish's excellent Pen & Sword Battleground Europework on the Op is my main source, and provides good unit-level descriptions of the actions I'm attempting to recreate now for Britpack '44-x. 'Enter the Tigers' I'll illustrate this piece next with a short report on the scenario I'm currently working on. This action was fought on 2nd August, by which time the British advance had pressed well south from their Start Lines near Caumont, past St Martin des Besaces and Hills 309 and 226 nearby - the latter being where 3 Scots Guards's Churchills were famously mauled by the Jagdpanthers of sch.Pz. Abt 654, a battle I have already completed for Britpack '44-x. This next action was also fought by Churchills of 6 Guards Tank Brigade, this time by the Coldstream Guards. My version of the battle sends a squadron of that unit's Churchill Mk IVs to re-inforce the Seaforth Highlanders on Hill 309, who are being flayed by enemy mortar and artillery fire and facing a counterattack by elements of 21 Panzer Division, supported by some King Tigers from 3 Kompanie, sch, Pz. Abt. 503. The real attack was intended to cut off the British drive by severing the spear near its base, but floundered in the face of stout tank and infantry resistance backed up by torrents of British artillery fire, of the sort said to have resulted in at least one German prisoner asking to be allowed to see the infamous British wonder-weapon, the belt-fed, multi-barrelled 25 Pounder gun. The mission's not completed yet, but from the playthroughs so far, it's just as well that I am equally well supported by artillery! We'll have a look at some scenes from the battlefield, next, before I mention what else to expect from Britpack '44-x, and when. ...to be continued!
- 2 replies
-
- 1
-
- panzer elite
- britpack
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Making the mission Oooh...that looks nasty. An incident on the way to relieve the recce boys at Dickie's Bridge. As well as several mods, Panzer Elite Special Edition came with a variety of useful tools, including landscape, object and scenario editors, the latter naturally being what I’m using to construct new missions. In addition to the short guide included with PESE, mission making tutorials are still available via the 'Tools' page at Brit44.com. Here’s a typical view of the Scenario Editor in action. As you can see, by default it uses the stock 'cartoon' map, which is a good representation of what's in the 3d world but not very military. Fortunately, the real maps included with PESE show that the game world is actually a very good representation of the real locations in Normandy, at about the time of Overlord. The light green markers on the left represent the player's squadron, with the platoons/troops expanded to show individual vehicles or squads. The big bright green rectangle just to their right is, as labelled, Hill 309, inside which are the markers for the Seaforth Highlanders (roughly a platoon, standing in for a larger force) and their ATk guns and carriers. The internal bright green rectangles mark the battle positions to which scripts order each troop and SHQ to move, each with a blue 'defensive position' marker in the middle (except for the player's 3 Troop, where the rectangle just acts as a marker for selected enemy forces to attack, to ensure the player sees a good share of the action!). To the east of Hill 309, in dead ground at the foot of the hill, is an area marked 'En[emy] FAP' for Final Assault Position. This acts both as an area towards which enemy attackers can be scripted to move, and as a target for Defensive Fires for friendly artillery, arranged in advance to deal with exactly that situation. Over towards the west are the grey unit markers denoting the attackers, placed mostly in the area marked as an enemy Assembly Area ('Forming Up Place' would have been a better description, but these labels don't appear in game unless you set them to) - this mainly acts as an area for broken enemy units to be scripted to withdraw towards. The block on the right of the main window is what's used to create and modify units, assisted by drop down lists in windows. Click on a unit in the list, and you can add a script which describes what it is to do. There is also a 'Global Script' which you can uses to set triggers for messages and artillery barrages, for example - like, when an enemy unit drives into that FAP, let fly with the DF shoot! PE scenarios are ‘projects’ which rely on several supporting files with different functions, the .scn file being only the main one, and it’s not as simple as starting with a single file for a new or existing mission. Once you’ve got past that, mission building is not particularly difficult, the tricky bit for me at any rate being to keep unit scripts simple enough to avoid them breaking down. This is especially important for me, as most of my missions attempt closer co-ordination in time and space between units than stock PE missions, and it’s not all about where the player’s unit goes or does. S Squadron, 3 Scots Guards ascends the northern slopes of Hill 226 en route to a rendezvous with destiny...or sch.Pz.Jg.Abt.654, to be more precise. One of the nice features of Aldo's latest code is a lower minimum external viewpoint roughly at turret top level, so it doesn't look and feel like you're standing on a set of rather tall but very stable stepladders on wheels. Listen in, chaps - orders! Creating the mission orders (commonly but improperly called a 'briefing') is a little project in itself. one of PE's strong points is that it provides for visual and verbal, chunk-by-chunk briefings at an animated map, which nicely simulates the ‘oral orders’ typically used in real life at an ‘O’ (orders) Group, as the British Army calls these sessions. Unfortunately, the stock PE orders are not particularly well done, in practice. For example, in real life the orders are given by the boss (a company commander, generally a Major, at the level at which PE is pitched) to all the participating platoon leaders, but in PE it’s often a subordinate who's doing the talking - and he’s invariably talking to the player, alone. The sense of taking part in a company-level action suffers from this, not helped because stock PE missions tend to scatter units widely over the battlefield and give them names (like ‘Combat Group Connolly’) which often imply they are much bigger units than the platoons they generally represent. C'est magnifique, mais ce n'est pas la guerre. Instead, the Britpack ’44-x missions will feature orders in a simplified/shortened but realistic and more systematic sequence - basically the British WW2 precursor to the NATO format - and (apart from a couple of ‘lone wolf’ missions) are given for a visibly company operation, delivered as if to all the company’s platoon leaders. Not all user made missions feature voice recordings for the orders, but mine will. Once battle is joined, the company commanders didn’t retire to a chateau in the rear but led their company on the operation. So the Britpack ’44-x scenarios, again unlike stock PE, will have a ‘command element’ which as any wargamer or peruser of the associated 'Army lists' knows, represents the ‘old man’ and his '2ic'or second-in-command in the battle. and the boss will from time to time be heard ‘on the air’ as the battle progresses, exercising such command and control as can reasonably be simulated. Sadly, I haven’t yet seen the wargame or sim which provides an AI command and control function, capable as a battle progresses of making combat appreciations and new plans and then communicating these to the subunit commanders, including the player. In place of PE’s somewhat detached simulated radio traffic - at least it has some - we will have both interventions from the company commander and other messages such as contact reports, using something better resembling authentic Radio Voice Procedure, sounding out over the unit radio net. Hopefully, the net effect (pun intended - geddit?) will be to provide a better representation of the experience of being a platoon leader in a late WW2 combined arms battle – or ‘troop leader’ I should say, as, for Britpack ’44-x, we will be dealing with tanks organised as troops and squadrons, not platoons and companies. Here’s the intro for ‘Enter the Tigers’, a scenario representing a defence by 4 Coldstreams and 2 Seaforths of Hill 309 against the 21st Panzer counterattack on 2 August 1944. Each of the other missions will have a similar scene-setting intro, in place of the somewhat detached, higher-level ones typically provided. "You are Lt Edward Cazenove, commanding the three Churchill infantry tanks of 3 Troop, 2 Squadron, 4 Coldstream Guards, 6th Guards Tank Brigade. The day before yesterday, Day 1 of Op Bluecoat, the Coldstreams captured Hill 309. Since early today, elements of 21st Panzer Division have been counter-attacking viciously from the east, with heavy mortar and artillery support. The Seaforth Highlanders, who relieved your tanks on Hill 309, have been hit hard. As you assemble with the other troop leaders for an O Group with the OC, Major Sir Mark Millbank, it's clear you're about to be pitched straight into the battle which you can hear raging just east of your Forming Up Position." The missions, like this one, aremostly squadron (company) affairs and I like them to start with the whole unit arraigned in the formation ordered, and in plain sight of the player. This I find helps orientation and reinforces the sense you’re participating in a squadron operation. To keep things manageable, I’m standardising on a squadron of three troops rather than four, with an HQ element. Infantry tanks units will, as in real life, have three Churchills per troop; other tank units will have three or four. In the pic below of the player’s tank, the rest of his (No. 3) Troop is out of shot to the right, in echelon formation. Behind him can be seen the two Churchills of Squadron HQ, just to the rear of the OP Sherman of the assigned Forward Observation Officer (a standard Britpack Sherman V, with ammo removed in the Scenario Editor to simulate a dummy gun). Yes, the stock PE landscapes are still a bit angular in places, but PE old timers like me, and hopefully you young 'uns out there too, can surely forgive such little foibles from an Old Girl who's still got so much to offer :) Behind SHQ is 1 Troop, providing the depth to the squadron’s formation. All three troops have an attached Achilles 17 Pounder SP gun (a British derivative of the US M10 tank destroyer) for this mission. 2 Troop is out of shot to the left. As described in the orders the player has just seen and heard, the squadron is deployed, and can be seen at once by the player to be deployed, ‘two [troops] up’ – 3 Troop left, 2 Troop right, and 1 Troop in depth, with SHQ (and the FOO) in the centre. From here, it will move at once the short distance to the crest of Hill 309, to reinforce the battered Seaforths. As the player sees the other tanks begin to move and fan out slightly, he will get his own troop moving too, to take up an unprepared position on the left of the defended locality, with arcs of view and fire to the east, from whence Jerry will come. As he moves, he can see and hear mortar fire flailing the Scottish infantry’s positions, up ahead. To digress, Aldo is working on improved models for the British tanks, with more fully animated 3-d tracks and suspension, but the absence of this isn’t particularly notable on the Churchill. Apart from a 95mm Close Support MkV in SHQ, all these Churchills are the cast-turret Mk IV, which has a 6 Pounder gun with a better anti-tank performance than the US/British 75mm tank gun. In reality, most of the Guards’ Churchills had by this time been ‘upgraded’ to 75mm which give them a much better HE shell, and Aldo may deliver a 75mm version of this tank at some point, enabling us to have a more realistic mix. We already have the 75mm gunned and more heavily armoured Churchill VII in the game, and this is featured in ‘South of Hill 112’, but the Guards seem to have had earlier marks, so I’ve stuck with the Mk IV. The green OP Sherman has the original Britpack ’44 textures; the khaki vehicles have Geezer’s super replacement textures, which plaster the underlying olive green shade with a lot of earth or mud. Moving up onto Hill 309 as the mortar fire eases off for a while, the player passes the little Carriers of the 6 Pounder towed ATk guns which are all the Seaforths would otherwise have to fend off the panzers. A little further on, he passes one of the guns - which after seeing this, I moved back into the shrubbery, on the next edit of this WIP mission, to the position seen in the pic at the top of the first post in this thread. Coming up to the crest, the player can see, prone and scattered about in cover, rifle and (Bren) gun groups from the Seaforths. At some point I hope to be able to put them into simulated slit trenches, when these are ready, But apparently, you reduce your vulnerability to shellfire by about 2/3 by being prone (compared to about 1/100th by crouching at the bottom of a slit trench). To compensate, I have limited most of the repeated German bombardments to 81mm mortars and spread these out, across the whole hill – it’s more for immersive effect than a serious attempt to destroy anything. The Seaforths and their organic ATk guns are back from the crest in a reverse slope position, ready to blast Jerry the moment he puts his head above the crest. A little further back would have been more realistic but after I moved them back from the original setup, they’re far enough back and in good enough cover to be out of sight to any enemies not caught in the killing ground to their front. To compensate, they have an OP (Observation Post) set up over on their right, in cover just on the forward slope. This will get 'eyes on' Jerry and enable us to get the Gunners onto him, while everyone else keeps out of sight. At this point, the player faces an interesting tactical dilemma – where to set up. There’s no time for grand flanking moves, especially at (very slow) infantry tank speed - the enemy will be met more or less head on. The ground slopes away quickly towards the enemy’s positions, with a convex slope providing dead ground in the area around the foot of the hill. If you go hull down near the crest, you get a frontal arc of view and fire out to the next crest line maybe a mile away, but the dead ground begins at about 800 yards or more. Not a great field of fire, especially against armour and using a relatively small gun like the 6 Pounder. But move forward to reduce the depth of the dead ground and you lose cover, possibly skylining your tanks into the bargain. In this playthrough, I moved my own Churchill into a turret down position from which I could see the enemy appear, while keeping the rest of the Troop and my attached Achilles echeloned back to my left and out of sight of the enemy. I missed the approach of an enemy armoured car patrol and a group of Panzer IV medium tanks, but other friendly forces spotted both and I was able to call down some of my plentiful artillery fire onto the latter using the map view, whom I think were also engaged by other Churchills on my right. The real fun began when I spotted in the binos a group of much bigger tanks advancing, a pair at a time, about 1200 yards off – enter the Tigers of the mission title, King Tigers in fact. I put the 5.5’ guns onto them, trying to anticipate their movements. Whie waiting for this shoot to arrive, I couldn’t resist rolling forward a bit and wasting some 6 Pounder AP on them, even some of my scarce APDS which I should have used for a tighter spot and a better target. I actually managed to land some hits, but sensibly pulled back before attracting return fire. The 'floating' horizon objects on the distant skyline in this bino view are rare and Aldo reckons may be cured if I switch from vertex to table fog in the current version of the PE 3d setup proggie. A further 5.5’ shoot seemed to immobilise and cripple the pair of King Tigers that I was concentrating on. So I rolled forward again to get ‘eyes on’ the other two and picked them up just as they moved closer in to the base of our hill. I got off a round at each before they slipped in underneath me somewhere - to no apparent effect - before pulling back again. I knew that the infantry had set up some DF (Defensive Fire) tasks for the Gunners into the likely enemy final assault position at the eastern foot of 309, and sure enough, it duly went off with a series of bangs, just as the radio net came alive with warnings of enemy dangerously close to the objective. We waited for the first panzers to appear on the crest up ahead, but they never did. Apart from the occasional enemy barrage on our positions, it went quiet. And stayed quiet. There being no further sightings of the enemy to our front, I took a chance and, having ordered the others to stay put, circled my Churchill out to the left and then back around to the right, onto the exposed forward slop of Hill 309. The half-expected AP round into my left from the east never came, so on I motored. Suddenly, I saw him as the ground ahead came into view – a King Tiger, broadside on and halted, facing uphill. The shellbursts you can see are our Gunners firing another DF shoot, which I narrowly missed driving into. I put several AP and my remaining APDS rounds into the side of his big turret, and was gratified when, instead of turning to blast me, it popped off in an internal explosion. Perhaps he’d already been damaged by one of the DF shoots, but no matter, a kill’s a kill. Having seen a second King Tiger make it into this area, I now brought down my 17 Pounder SP to join the Churchill (by jumping to and taking over the former, as I wanted to conduct the coming shoot in person). However, distracted by checking my map as I drove the SP across the face of the hill, I managed to roll him, thus proving that the Achilles in Britpack is realistically more top heavy than the low-slung Churchill. Feeling bolder despite this, I drove the Churchill forward and managed to locate, surprise and destroy the second King Tiger in similar fashion. I found out later that a scripting limitation, since fixed, had likely caused them to halt there, rather than pressing on up into our positions...though they might very well also have been damaged by our artillery fire. After that, my Churchill met and shot up several German half-tracks which unwisely pressed the issue, and soon afterwards, the mission was adjuged won, insamuch as we had, as ordered, held Hill 309. I have already made some changes which will make the mission more of a challenge, including a ‘killer’ variation, but the player more desirous of a hard time can always decide not to call in the plentiful artillery support which swung the course of the real battle, and likely this one too. And rely purely on direct gunfire. In which case, good luck, you’ll need it with those King Tigers! Personally, I prefer relatively easy missions to playing ‘space invaders with tanks’. And I like to bring my boys home, rather than regarding their tanks as ‘lives’ I will need to go through in order to win the battle. I think a mission is sufficiently challenging if it will punish gross mistakes or otherwise go awry now and then, but in general, will be quite survivable. The next steps PE’s scenarios can be played individually or as a campaign, so I will have to work out how to chain the new scenarios together for the latter purpose. However, that will add little beyond crew management (with the player’s name not matching the historical one used in the intro). Supply is also a feature of PE campaigns but limited ammo or fuel supplies – or replacement tanks, which in stock campaigns can force the player to use non-historical or downright silly mixtures of vehicles – is particularly inappropriate for the Allied side in 1944, so has been largely made irrelevant by edits to the relevant files in Britpack ’44-x. As Charles Gunst once said of a mod for European Air War, did you 'sign up' to fight battles or be a supply clerk? Another feature of stock PE missions is that they come in pairs, featuring Allied and German sides. I haven’t decided what to do about this yet, and may do nothing, leaving the German scenarios as they are – if you want to play as the Germans in Normandy, you might as well play the stock missions in the stock US/German campaign. What would be of more interest – to me, anyway! - is eventually expanding Britpack ’44-x by replacing the stock Tunisia and Italy scenarios, so we could have Hunt’s Gap, 48 RTR's capture of Tiger 131, the North Irish Horse shocking the Germans by climbing Longstop Hill, and all that sort of thing. But first things first - and that’s to get an up-to date, PE-x version of Britpack ’44 out, and that means Normandy. I reckon it’ll take me up to two months to complete the missions, maybe less as I’m just completing number five out of about a dozen. I have allowed a backlog of voice recordings to build up, though now ably assisted in that department by fellow British PE player Murkz. That aside, the five so far pretty well built and playing now are: 19 July 1944 – South of Hill 112 – two-phase Squadron attack by 107 Regiment, Royal Armoured Corps (Churchill VII) 30 July 1944 – Showdown on Hill 226 – 3 Scots Guards vs the Jagdpanthers and friends (Churchill VII) 31 July 1944 – Dickie’s Bridge – a 2 Household Cavalry Regt patrol locates an undefended bridge (Humber Armoured Car) 31 July 1944 - BESAs Blazing – 2 Northants Yeomanry relieve 2HCR at Dickie’s Bridge (Cromwell IV) 2 Aug 1944 - Enter the Tigers - 4 Coldstream Guards defend Hill 309 (Churchill IV) Among the scenarios planned is The Mace, which will feature the desperate battle of the Polish 1st Armoured to seal the Falaise Pocket.The Canadians will also get a mission, as fellow users of British kit. Apart from this, the basic install will need to be assembled from the current beta, as a downloadable and pre-packaged mod. The new missions may be made available in the form of a separate mod, to save space and facilitate players who prefer the original scenarios (the US missions with British kit). Assuming it’s not just my own settings or hardware which it may well be, the current puny artillery sounds need replacement, and we’d like to be able to add the best 3d models that can be incorporated in a reasonable time (or if all else fails, finer textures for some of the original Britpack units, German as well as British). So I’d be reluctant to start bandying about release dates at this stage. But it shouldn’t be TOO far off. Considering I started work on the mission revamps about twenty years ago, it’ll be no time at all! Where it all began - Churchill VII in 'South of Hill 112'
- 2 replies
-
- panzer elite
- britpack
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
From the album Combat Sims
-
Panzer Elite - Britpack '44 - Showdown at Hill 226 scenario
33LIMA posted a gallery image in Member's Albums
From the album Combat Sims
-
Ostpak Redux is available now: http://pedg.yuku.com/topic/2514/Re-Ostpak-Redux-Beta-released-Download-links?page=-1#.WQECUGcYFuI
-
Close to being released, I believe. Britpack '44-x is also being worked on... South of Hill 112 scenario: Dickie's Bridge scenario: .
-
Panzer Elite Britpack '44-x beta - Humber Armoured Car
33LIMA posted a gallery image in Member's Albums
From the album Combat Sims
-
Panzer Elite Britpack '44-x beta - Dickie's Bridge scenario - Humber Armoured Cars
33LIMA posted a gallery image in Member's Albums
From the album Combat Sims
-
From the album Combat Sims