SayethWhaaaa

I got permission from Capun on the condition that I gave due credit to Sundowner (I can't seem to get in contact with him) but for some reason, it hardly ever allows me to upload there. I nearly always get: The error returned was: Sorry, you do not have permission to start a topic in this forum. Is it possible to have this thread moved there?

Only the F-23 has been released. The others are all in development. The Foxhound is probably the closest to an actual release. I mean, if you just scroll down a little from this thread, you'll see the section on the Mig-31.

Uh... Have you had a look for it? It ain't hard to find. Look in the downloads section.

The scary thing is that I've seen parent groups site this article as guide for parents looking to 'curb' their children's internet usage. I personally like the 9th point, where he describes ravers as being hackers. I'm a raver and I know jack about programing. I do know how to bounce around with glowsticks like a moron though!

The two airframe's haven't been destroyed. One's on display at Patuxent River Naval Air Museum and Boeing is said to have the other, not sure where, for systems trials and static testing. I'm not even sure it's air worthy. The word going around was that Nasa Dryden was going to pick up a copy but there hasn't been a whole lot of movement. It would be good to have a model of that ugly looking plane! In my experiecne, the ugly ones are usually enjoyable to fly and prove quite usefull (I site aircraft like the A-6 Intruder, A-7 Corsair II and the Phantom as examples of this)

If you come over to my house, you so ain't using the crapper!

I think it's got something to do with with the latest patch because I now have the same problem with WoV. Here's what I'm doing: Using an F-4E as an example. I take off, fly to usually to second, maybe last waypoint BEFORE the target waypoint, that way I should be within radar range of any aerial targets. I activate my radar, put it into search mode and select my SAHM. Now, before I added the patch, I would target the hostile (y was my targetting key). When close enough to acquire the hostile, I would do so (in my case, alt+y), then fire. I'd follow the missile, making sure I was still on target and wait for a hit. After the hit, I'd cycle through availabe targets with y. I just tried it then with various aircraft (F-4E, F-14A, F-5E, Mig-29) but no joy. Could it be that the latsest patch doesn't like re-mapped keys?

No it's keyboard but I remapped the keys after I finished the patching. I had this problem once before when I first applied the 30/08/06 patch ("patch8"). Only fixed it with a re-install which is what I might have to do here.

Wish I could get my employer on to this, I regularly get roughly 200+ spam emails every week and that's with their lame spam filter that clogs up my inbox with notifications of spam ON TOP of the junk I get. I need to get the Dominik Hasek of spam flters... It really does suck when you have to spend at least 30mins cleaning your junk out! Is NTL solely a UK service?

There is a bug with SFG I've noticed where sometimes after a fresh install and complete patching, some key binds won't work. I have the same problem as you right now in that my Active and Semi-Active missles won't fire, but that's because it won't allow me to acquire a radar lock. Even though I've used the same key binds with a previous install, for some reason they won't work, even though I've got the correct radar mode up, I'm pressing the right keys, using different, appropriate aircraft (Try getting a radar lock with a Skyraider and you're in for a long arvo, ), I get nada. What patch are you using?

These are just suggesstions because I'd be grateful for just about anything (I know some of these are probably already mentioned): American stuff like: F-16E Block 60 F-16XL F-16ATF (the one with the small canards under the intake) I know F-20's already been said but it would be gold! an 'in-service' version of the X-29 (or F-29) F-15 MTD (or F-15 Active if you play the Ace Comabt games) SR-71 or YF-12 F-4X (the US/Israeli concept for a Mach 3 Phantom recon platfrom or the fighter from the Ace Combat series) FB-22 proposed Raptor Strike Variant Convair B-36 YA-10B Grumman S-2 Tracker or the AWACS variant E-1B Tracer AH-64 Apache YAH-66 Commanche any of those Dale Brown monstrosities (Like the EB-52E) B-1B/B-1R or the Super Tomcat 21 proposal (http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/planes/q0132.shtml) << Gold! or some Russian stuff like: I'm sure at some point there was a Su-24 and an Su-25 in dev Sukhoi Su-32 Sukhoi Su-27 Family, particularly the Su-33!! or Su-35!! or Su-37!! or even the Indian Su-30MKI, but mostly the Su-37!! Sukhoi-47 Berkut (I know Gerald14 has made the 3DSM model but has anyone done anything with it?) or it's further developed bro, the S-32 (Ace Combat Series) The Mig 1.42 MFI Any Version of the Tu-95/142 Bear Antonov 124 or 225 Antonov 72/74 Tu-22M-3/4 Backfire Tu-160 Blackjack Yak-38 Forger Yak-141 Freestyle The Firefox (the Clint Eastwood movie for the young 'uns (Spot Sir Nigel Hawethorn in it!)) or Some European stuff like: Tornado ADV Eurofighter (I know it's already been mentioned) Rafaele M or the two seat Air Force B version Mirage 2000D/N Avro Vulcan!!! (maybe like the ones used in the Falklands with the external hardpoints) The Nimrods including the hideously ugly AEW variant The Hercules C.3/C.4 stretched models Or other things like the IAI Kfir I know the J-10s in dev but the chinese FC-1/J-9, JH-7 or Q-5 Fantams would be pretty cool Or if all that's too bland, what about: Maccross Plus vehicles (or Robotech depending on where you are) like: YF-19 (http://www.macrossworld.com/macross/news/news49_hasegawa-yf-19-1.jpg) YF-21 (http://www.macrossworld.com/mwf/index.php?showtopic=10821&mode=linear) or even the oldschool VF-1 (http://www.macrossworld.com/macross/art/wongstervf1.jpg) Or the aircraft in Sentou Yousei Yukikaze? Oooh... Like I said, these are just some examples but after going back over that list, I just realised I need to get out more Either way, you make top stuff Veltro, can't wait to see what you surprise us with! What about Rachel Bilson?

I was messing around with some skins one night and I was just looking to post them here. They're very, very simple mods of Sundowner's default skin for the Mig-25PD. The idea came from a combination one of the Mig-31M textures in Ace Combat Zero and the contemporary Su-27 sky blue colour scheme... Not too sure on how to post the images in here... Mod Edit use jpegs, bmp take to long to download

Alrighty, lets see if this works... http://s144.photobucket.com/albums/r187/du...mgAnch=imgAnch1 http://s144.photobucket.com/albums/r187/du...mgAnch=imgAnch2 http://s144.photobucket.com/albums/r187/du...mgAnch=imgAnch3 And the Green Nose model: http://s144.photobucket.com/albums/r187/du...mgAnch=imgAnch2 http://s144.photobucket.com/albums/r187/du...mgAnch=imgAnch1

Cheers guys, I'll give it a looksee...

I was of the understanding that both ATF and JSF designs had wing hadpoints incorporated into their designs to allow for ferry tanks? That's why defence analyst's here in Oz are pissy about the JSF (as well as for many other reasons) as it will need external hardpoints in order to approach the F-111's service profile which kinda defeats the purpose of buying a multirole strike platform to replace a dedicated long range strike platform. The plan was to operate F-22s and JSFs in either clean (no externals, lower radar return) or conventional profiles depending on the environmental situation wasn't it? Or is that still being debated? Oh, this if the current profile of the F-22 with externals: http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ac/f-22.htm Ps. ^^ Working on prototype fighter programs... sweet work if you can get it!

Damn Cap, you never quit with the good stuff, do you?

Hell... If I'm not gonna get air support from Red Crown, I'd settle for a re-arming/refueling back at the airfield like LOMAC so I could go back out and do the deed myself. I miss the good ol' days of Freelancer 2 with your back up wing on station and in Hyperspace. If you're getting your butt handed to you on a platter, you could dial up some backup and they'd be there in seconds But then again, it was 200 years or so in the future... interceptors had advanced a bit by then!

That particular article states that you can't change the carrier name from CV-63 or something to that effect meaning you can only have that particular carrier on station. By adding the Forrestal and the KittyHawk, does this mean that multiple carriers can be added at once? I'm interested because I'm coming from the point of view that I wouldn't mind adding a carrier for each side, or multiple carriers depending on the nation.

Work = lousy, not the scooter I had this same problem with my pig and the A-4 I use is the A-4G but then again for some reason there are a few things that don't work on that particular model despite being able to get them to work on the A-4K Kahu. I used the process above here to get my pigs in order (though never had this problem with the F-111C) gonna try it in a sec on my Aussie Scooter...

Yeah but the sucka's legless, totally underpowered. Vulnerable during landing and (allegedly) manouvers like a bbq plate with a full load (fuel & moderate weapons load). Although the F-CK is supposed to rectify all this. Shame the new model won't have the dielectric radar-absorbing fuselage. That would have been sweet...

I've had problems loading these kind of pods as well as other kinds onto some A-4s (in that the pod was registered as being there but was invisible during the sortie). I'll have to give this a go when I get home from work. Lousy job... :fuk:

Fubes, that's a nice SEA map. Just curious but what's the possibility of that map causing a bit of chunk up during game?

So I finally got my mits on a copy of WoV a short time ago and have been battling my computer to actually get it to work. Never had a technical problem with SFG, WoV on the other hand... yeah... go figure. Anyways, long story short, I just noticed as I was porting over my 5gig of modded aircraft from SFG to WoV that Wings only allows you to sortie between 1968 and 1976 (give or take a year). Where abouts would the definition of what years I can choose to fly be? I'm sure it's been posted on this site how to change it before but after a couple days of searching I'm still coming up with nada. I'm not so worried about the campaigns, I'll make my own set whenever in due course, it's just that in the meantime I can't use contemporary aircraft (LIKE THAT GD SWEET F-23A!!!!!!) with modern loadouts. essentially I'm, limited to ordinance produced up to 1976, aside from a few that inexplicably work. And an F-23A minus Amraams or JDAMs just doesn't sit well with me. Any help?

Thanks guys, it's all good now. I was having a bit of a blonde moment when looking at the knowledge base and I kept seeing WoV as WoE... I kinda tuned them both out as I'd been playing SFG mostly and looking out for anything tagged SFG. Cheers again!

F-22? Who cares about that p.o.s. when you have a supurb stallion like the F-23???