+Tailspin 3 Posted January 6, 2007 I can't see where anyone "tore into" Bort's creation. Perhaps I could have worded the climb rate comment a little better but Bort is the one that played the "realism card" and I was pointing out the obvious case where real world statistics do affect sim "realism" as a counterpoint to his comments. Considering the very mild nature of any of the comments made in relation to Bort's Eindecker I don't see where anyone should feel too guilty about it. FYI...I'm very much aware of the fine line between participating in a forum and moderating one. I called on other staff members to advise me on this one just to be sure I wasn't out of line. I'm satisfied that neither I nor anyone else was. I thought at the time that Bort's reactions were way overboard and still do. In the end, like I've said before, just because I'm a moderator I'm not going stop participating in board discussions and I may, God forbid, disagree with someone now and then. Thats something else ya'll are gonna have to deal with too. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Melnibone 0 Posted January 6, 2007 (edited) There's always a place for constructive dialogue - that's all I can see was being offered up. The second post on this thread is the illuminating one to me. It's a great looking plane anyway. Edited January 6, 2007 by Melnibone Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
+Dave 2,322 Posted January 6, 2007 All the help was given to him in a polite manner. You put something out there, be ready for people to comment on it. Its how you comment on it that makes all the difference. Lets move on. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
