+ghostrider883 526 Posted August 23, 2007 Weaponised version of Dhruv makes maiden flight Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JediMaster 451 Posted August 23, 2007 I've never cared for throwing weapons on utility helos and calling them "combat ready." UH-60s, AH-6s, OH-58Ds... They can't be as durable as the ones built for it from the start. Gimme the ones bred for fighting like the Cobra and Hind! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hawk MMS 0 Posted August 23, 2007 helicopters are bullet magnets. i would not want to be in that thing when the bullets are flying. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JediMaster 451 Posted August 23, 2007 In fact, we can make a little analogy! Helicopters :: bullets as trailer parks :: tornados Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
+ghostrider883 526 Posted August 24, 2007 (edited) None of the dedicated attack helicopters can do what the Mi-17 gunships did in the 1999 Indo-Pak Kargil War. The Mi-17s were providing fire support to the advancing Indian Army in the Kargil heights. There was no way our Mi-25s/35s could operate at that altitude(nor can any other dedicated attack helo). Rocket and gunpod armed Mi-17s effectively supressed the Pakistanis who has occupied those heights. Though one Mi-17 was lost to Pakistani Stinger. But that's a different story. Later IAF fighter bombers bombed the crap out of the Pakistanis. The Dhruvs are built to fly in high altitude areas. It may not be able to carry as much fire powere as the Mi-17(six rocket pods), but an armed Dhruv can still be effective. Edited August 24, 2007 by ghostrider883 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JediMaster 451 Posted August 24, 2007 Yes, that's true that they may have different flight envelopes than the dedicated helos. Of course, that points to a flaw in the design of the gunships then, doesn't it? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
