Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

This was posted over at "The Aerodrome". Does anyone know this book?

 

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Sky-Their-Battlefield-Complete-Casualties/dp/1898697302

 

"The Sky Their Battlefield" gives a Western Front loss of 5,364 (Appendix I)

or 5,352 (Appendix II) aircraft.

 

Using a search based on the pilot being killed or taken prisoner the database

has coughed up the following losses for each type:

 

1. Camel (656)

2. SE5a (308)

3. RE8 (258)

4. DH4 (234)

5. DH9 (215)

6. F2B (213)

7. FE2b (169)

8. Strutter (100)

9. BE2c (94)

10.Nieuport 17 (88)

11. Pup (74)

12. Spad 7 (73)

13. FE2d (60)

14. AW FK8 (56)

15. Dolphin (50)

16. BE2e (48)

17. Triplane (48)

18. Nieuport 23 (39)

19. DH2 (38)

20. DH5 (34)

21. BE2d (32)

22. SE5 (26)

Edited by Olham
Posted

Interesting list also interesting that the Camel has twice as many losses compared to the rest of the Aircraft... But thats also probably due to the Camel being used as a low level Ground attack as well as being shot down by other fighters...

Posted

it's rather surprising how few of the different AC have been shot down. gives you a sense of how precious it was in real to have a kill, and why you were considered an ace with 5 kills (at least in the beginning). shows a bit how too bloody most ww1 aviation sims are. but i'm sure p4 will take care of that :good:

Posted

Yes, indeed! I tried both craft, and must say that the S.E.5a is handling much easier,

flies with similar speed as a SPAD XIII, but turns better.

The S.E.5a is a very good energy fighter you may even turn with - as an Albatros man,

I would prefer it to the Camel.

Posted

This was posted over at "The Aerodrome". Does anyone know this book?

http://www.amazon.co...s/dp/1898697302

"The Sky Their Battlefield" gives a Western Front loss of 5,364 (Appendix I)

or 5,352 (Appendix II) aircraft.

 

Yes, I have it. It is/was one of the source books from the GoGS used in building Over Flanders Fields - one of several 'bibles'. There is of course, much more to it than just a list of a/c losses, and while it does not cover every incident, it certainly helps paint the picture and colour in many of the details of the war in the air. Trevor has for years been threatening us with a follow-up edition - if it ever appears, I will be in the front row to grab a copy.

 

Cheers,

shredward

Posted

The raw numbers are only half the story though. For a more meaningful picture you'd have to cross-reference it with the length of time the type was in service, the density of contemporaneous air activity and the relative hazard of the 'typical' mission profiles each type undertook et cetera. Each type then would occupy a relevant position in a multi dimensional hypercube.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..