Hauksbee Posted February 12, 2013 Posted February 12, 2013 (edited) I'm coming up with a blank on this one. I vaguely recall Lloyd designing similar planes. There was a theory at the time that if the depth of the fuselage took up the whole space between the wings, there was an advantage in speed, or handling, or...? In any case it was a design fad that soon disappeared. Edited February 12, 2013 by Hauksbee Quote
ataribaby Posted February 12, 2013 Posted February 12, 2013 (edited) Its experimental fighter DFW T28 Floh. I think main advantage was small size and thus high speed. At least that was planned. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DFW_Floh I know cos i finished 1/72 kit of this some time ago. Edited February 12, 2013 by ataribaby Quote
Hauksbee Posted February 12, 2013 Author Posted February 12, 2013 Thanks, ataribaby.'Floh', is it? (Flea) Looks like one. Probably would have flown like one, had the prototype not crashed. Thanks for the link. Quote
+Hasse Wind Posted February 12, 2013 Posted February 12, 2013 There must have been something in the water the designer used to drink. Quote
Hauksbee Posted February 12, 2013 Author Posted February 12, 2013 There must have been something in the water the designer used to drink. Amen. From most any angle, it had the look of something that wasn't going to work. Quote
ataribaby Posted February 12, 2013 Posted February 12, 2013 Yeah, interesting plane. Thats why it got my attention. Here is my 1/72 buils. Saddly i botched that black rims. Was lazy to mask by tape and i made it freehand with brush. Very bad idea. As i totaly moved my models hobby into WW1 1/32 planes i want to make it in that scale. http://www.modelforum.cz/viewtopic.php?p=1215648#p1215648 Quote
rjw Posted February 12, 2013 Posted February 12, 2013 There must have been something in the water the designer used to drink. Looks like it could have been an early precursor to the WWII Messerschmitt Me 163 Komet based on its profile in the photo, albeit a stubby one!! Quote
Flyby PC Posted February 14, 2013 Posted February 14, 2013 (edited) Scratching my head, but I'm sure I've seen a Flea in a simulator somewhere ... Light blue in colour, and the cowling looks like a smiley face from head on. Now where did I see it??? Hmmm....... It'll come to me. Edit - Microsoft FS9 I think.... Edited February 14, 2013 by Flyby PC Quote
+Hasse Wind Posted February 14, 2013 Posted February 14, 2013 Now imagine Olham chasing crumpets in that crate! Quote
+Olham Posted February 14, 2013 Posted February 14, 2013 (edited) "Huh!!! Why do you ssink I'm only flyink der Albatros? Ze answer is: because itt iss so beautifull! Huh!!!" Cute Floh video - lovely! Edited February 14, 2013 by Olham Quote
Maeran Posted February 15, 2013 Posted February 15, 2013 I can imagine what Voss would have done with the 'face' on that cowling. Quote
Flyby PC Posted February 15, 2013 Posted February 15, 2013 I can't look at it without thinking of Dick Dastardly and Muttley stopping the pigeon. Quote
+Hasse Wind Posted February 15, 2013 Posted February 15, 2013 It really does look like something out of a cartoon. If it had been a success, would the skies of Europe have been full of such fat little fighters? Quote
+Olham Posted February 15, 2013 Posted February 15, 2013 It really does look like something out of a cartoon. If it had been a success, would the skies of Europe have been full of such fat little fighters? Maybe the skies of Europe would have been full of laughter? Quote
+Hasse Wind Posted February 16, 2013 Posted February 16, 2013 It would have been the perfect aircraft for Gert Fröbe! Quote
Flyby PC Posted February 16, 2013 Posted February 16, 2013 (edited) http://tma-aircraft....loh-purice.html Seems it wasn't completely without it's merits... The stubby shape was to reduce the drag from struts and wires, and even the deep fuselage got rid of struts below the upper wing and also meant the guns were inside the fuselage. In 1915, the EIII was making all the running, so the Flea did have some innovations which you could say were ahead of it's time perhaps... 112mph in 1915, when the EIII was around 90mph and a Be2 around 70mph. (Incidentally, the text in the link is Hungarian if you're text translation struggles.) Seems the big problem was the poor visibility on the ground, and a high landing speed. Edited February 16, 2013 by Flyby PC Quote
+Olham Posted February 17, 2013 Posted February 17, 2013 Yes, indeed, Hasse Wind - Fröbe would have suited the Floh. I wonder how they built the fuselage - I guess it was "Wickelrumpf" technology. When you see the Mercedes D.I engine, which was fitted into the "Floh", you may understand why it is so unproportionally high. Quote
rjw Posted February 17, 2013 Posted February 17, 2013 Yes, indeed, Hasse Wind - Fröbe would have suited the Floh. I wonder how they built the fuselage - I guess it was "Wickelrumpf" technology. When you see the Mercedes D.I engine, which was fitted into the "Floh", you may understand why it is so unproportionally high. Olham; That is an interesting photo of the mercedes engine. Do you have any details/background on that photo? Looks like it is in someone's livingroom. Quote
+Olham Posted February 17, 2013 Posted February 17, 2013 Naw, there was no info with the pic. Could it be in a museum? No idea... Quote
+Hasse Wind Posted February 18, 2013 Posted February 18, 2013 I think it's a museum. You can see some reflections on the glass, if you look closely. Of course the museum could be operating in a living room. That Mercedes engine was quite popular in many other early German aircraft designs of WW1. It was used in Albatros and Aviatik two-seaters, for example the Aviatik B.I, below: Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.