Jump to content

dsawan

ELITE MEMBER
  • Content count

    3,244
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by dsawan

  1. GO COLTS!

    SAINTS COME MARCHING IN!GO NEW ORLEANS. I'm actually a PATS fan as i am from New England. But the Saints have never won a championship.
  2. yes, you bet. Looks good.
  3. Did not know there was a pitch for the f-117 as a navy plane. See here: F-117N “Seahawk” In the early 1990s, Lockheed began to pitch an upgraded, carrier capable variant of the F-117 dubbed the “Seahawk” as an alternative to the canceled A/F-X program. The unsolicited proposal was received poorly by the Department of Defense, who had little interest in the single mission capabilities of such an aircraft, particularly as it would take money away from the Joint Advanced Strike Technology program (which evolved into the Joint Strike Fighter). The new aircraft would have differed from the land based F-117 in several ways, including the addition “of elevators, a bubble canopy, a less sharply swept wing and reconfigured tail".[27] The “N” variant would also be re-engined to use General Electric F414 turbofans instead of the older General Electric F404s. Furthermore the aircraft would be optionally fitted with hardpoints, allowing for an additional 8,000 lb of payload, and a new ground attack radar with air-to-air capability. In that role the F-117N could carry AIM-120 AMRAAM air-to-air missiles.[27][28] After being rebuffed by the Navy, Lockheed submitted an updated proposal that included afterburning capability and a larger emphasis on the F-117N as a multimission aircraft, rather than just an attack aircraft.[28] In efforts to boost interest, Lockheed also proposed an F-117B land-based variant that shared most of the F-117N capabilities. This variant was proposed to both the US Air Force and the RAF[29]. This renewed F-117N proposal was also known as the A/F-117X[30]. Neither the F-117N or the F-117B were purchased by any party. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F-117 Wonder what it would look like in US navy service?
  4. Nice! Any chance on a sf2 version down the road/
  5. Join Date: Jun 2005 Age: 36 Posts: 171 Damn! my add-on cd cant be read -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hi, I was wondering if someone can help. I accidentally dropped my addon cd on the floor and when I put it in the cd drive, pc wont read it. I hope its not scratched. It has all my files from october of last year. Its a dvd. I tried another cd and it read it so its not the drive. I tried cleaning surface of dvd with alcholol and cloth but no go. Is there a utility that can assist? thks.
  6. Awesome. i think i'll make them standalone though in my ac folder.
  7. Nice, always wanted a T-2 buckeye for thirdwire. Only nhave the cfs 2 version. Is this still wip or eta available? thx.
  8. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EAAl2zfk684&feature=player_embedded#
  9. Not a fan of the next geneneration. If Star trek 2 had been average, I think III searhc for spock would have been the best. Still like Commander kruge played by the guy from Taxi-Christopher Lloyd.
  10. Just need a fi-156 storch and we have the tandem crew.
  11. Hi, I noticed some pilots and gunners have all white texures on them. this happens alot in sf2 woe when i put ww2 planes in. For ex, the PE-8, and some of Capuns B-25's. is there a way to edit it so they appear normal? Thx.
  12. Nice, was waiting for this. Good job.
  13. Hi, all. I just got this message form windows saying Dcom server process launcher has quit and windows needs to be restarted. Anyone know aht this is or causes it? thx.
  14. Song from the motherland

    Well, I dont know about dance moves, but they look cute in uniform.
  15. F-104S Revamp

    bmp!
  16. Thx, was waitinf or this. will test in sf2 europe to see how it is.
  17. Thx, was waitin for this. i want to do testing in sf2 Europe. Will let you know how it goes.
  18. Hi, is anyone planning to do fixes for these since they were released as freeware and being incompatible with sf2? Would it be possible to upload them here or provide some guide to tweak them? I notice the propeller doesn't work as in sf1 and the cockpits are invisible or the outliens are transparent. thx.
  19. oh, good to know. Guess I'll wait for those then. Thx for info.
×

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..