Jump to content

Gepard

+MODDER
  • Content count

    6,138
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    238

Posts posted by Gepard


  1. 10 minutes ago, Stratos said:

    Fingers crossed, I really enjoyed the Hind book.

    Maybe one day a MiG-21 book.

    I had started to write a MiG-21 book some years ago, but an other author was faster and offered his manuscript to the publishing house, while i was still on writing. Bad timing.

    • Sad 1

  2. On 4.4.2024 at 6:06 PM, daddyairplanes said:

    one: how the hell do ya have a Phantom parked on the runway?

     

    A parked plane middle on the runway is a sign, that one of the parking positions in the airfield.ini is wrong. It's the terrainbuilders fault.

    Mandatory screenshots: Belgian Thunderstreaks over the English Channel.

    img00361.thumb.JPG.e8edf3f1740fead9eb7334a98be994a2.JPG

    img00362.thumb.JPG.2824aa5f61646d36a266a1168964e103.JPG

     

     

    • Like 2

  3. Strange thing.

    I placed an Eiffel Tower on the map, mid in Paris. In game it does not appear.

    Then i placed it at Paris Le Bourget airport over a hangar, for orientation reasons. Again the Eiffeltower is not visible in game. Then i flew my test plane exactly over the said hangar and the plane collided with the invisible Eiffeltower.

    One of the strange miracles of SF2 world.

    66158bba4bf06_Bild1Eiffel.thumb.jpg.62a26f82c7e68c75c232cd356a0b6f9e.jpg

    • Sad 1

  4. 6 hours ago, JamesWilson said:

    This is outstanding info!!!

    How did you get those? Is there any link or source? I'm looking for so long for infos regarding 1st and 2nd Gulf of Sidra Incidents and i can't find much, it's like the dynamics have already

     

    Here the libyan view: https://warisboring.com/the-libyans-describe-a-different-version-of-their-1981-battle-with-the-u-s-navy/

    It comes from a book by Tom Cooper Libyan Air Wars, Volumes 1 & 2.

    • Thanks 1

  5. 12 hours ago, mehlhorndirk said:

    Hello,

    concerning the incident over Syrte in the year1981 it is not clear if the Su-22 or Su-22M were armed with either the R-3S or the more advanced R-13M. It can be that an R-3s was fired by mistake or that an R-13M was fired with an “limited” head-on look. If the seek of an R-13M were close to the heat source it could be possible to look on head-on. But the distance was normally too close as that the missile could guide properly. Therefore, the term “Limited” Head-On capability.

     

     

    The R-13M, Advanced Atoll, had not had a head on capability. It never had, not even under optimal conditions. The first soviet all aspect AAM was the late R-60 (AA-8 Aphid).

    If you read the american story of this dogfight you will find, hat the libyan Su-22 fired the missile at a range of 300 meters or less. This is deep in the so called "dead zone", also the distance were the missile is not guided and is flying only ballistically. The "dead zone" of a R-3S is 1.000 - 1.500 meters, the R-13M had a dead zone of 600 to 800 meters. In this zone the missile will hit nothing. And the pilots knew it very well.  So it is doubtfull, that the fight happend so, as it is publicated in western media.

    The Libyans tell another story. They say, that the Su-22 came in the back of a F-14 pair and fired one missile, which hit one F-14. They showed this photo as evidence:

    660a708834bb4_Bild1F-14Teil.jpg.58795240ab2b1ec78b2a3015a90b89cd.jpg

    This photo is not an evidence of a kill, but only of a hit. Maybe the Tomcat was only damaged and made it back to the carrier.

    The Libyans admit to have lost two Su-22 at this day. They say, that six F-14 were vectored toward the Sukhois to save the attacked Tomcat pair. And this six F-14 shot down the Sukhois.

    • Thanks 2
×

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..