-
Content count
861 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Gallery
Downloads
Store
Everything posted by Svetlin
-
Apu-60-1
Svetlin replied to KnightWolf45's topic in Thirdwire: Strike Fighters 2 Series - File Announcements
Yes, there are ways (not just one): - fake pilot/seat method; - fake fuel tank method. Here is the proof: -
MiG-17PF and Chengdu J-5A Fresco-D
Svetlin replied to paulopanz's topic in Thirdwire: Strike Fighters 2 Series - File Announcements
Paulo, all special thanks go to you only for the dedication and attention even to small air forces such as ours. Thank you, my friend, and I am waiting patiently for the time when you get to MiG-21 :-) -
Viper Zero reborn
Svetlin replied to Dels's topic in Thirdwire: Strike Fighters 2 Series - Mods & Skinning Discussion
+1 -
Mirage Factory IDF F-4E Kurnass 2000 for Strike Fighters 2
Svetlin replied to dtmdragon's topic in Thirdwire: Strike Fighters 2 Series - File Announcements
-
Mirage Factory IDF F-4E Kurnass 2000 for Strike Fighters 2
Svetlin replied to dtmdragon's topic in Thirdwire: Strike Fighters 2 Series - File Announcements
OK, I am now sure it is an issue with the model itself, not a problem with the aircraft data.ini. I deliberately deactivated the rails intended for Python 3 and then took a screenshot of the rails for Sidewinder. I am sure the aicraft data.ini is calling the correct rails, but the inner and outer IRM rail under the left wing appear to be closer to eachother than those under the right wing. The effect is missiles appear as if improperly attached (floating). See attached screenshot. Using the supports under the inner pylon as a reference point, you can see the rails under the right wing are separated and do not touch the supports, while the rails under the left wing clearly touch them. Apparently the rails under the left wing need to be a little bit more separated from the pylon to be identical to the rails under the right wing. -
Mirage Factory IDF F-4E Kurnass 2000 for Strike Fighters 2
Svetlin replied to dtmdragon's topic in Thirdwire: Strike Fighters 2 Series - File Announcements
OK, re-downloaded, placed it in several separate SF2 installs I have and the problem is still there. Look at the picture - the Pythons under the left wing are in mid-air. What's more, even when I loaded Sidewinders, they appear on the same rails. -
Mirage Factory IDF F-4E Kurnass 2000 for Strike Fighters 2
Svetlin replied to dtmdragon's topic in Thirdwire: Strike Fighters 2 Series - File Announcements
OK, thanks, will do later today and report back. -
Mirage Factory IDF F-4E Kurnass 2000 for Strike Fighters 2
Svetlin replied to dtmdragon's topic in Thirdwire: Strike Fighters 2 Series - File Announcements
Guys, I am facing a problem with the IRM launch rails on the left inner pylon. As I get it, there should be small rails, with small spacing to the pylon, used to load Sidewinder and may be Python 4. Then there should be larger rails, with greater spacing to the pylon to allow loading of Python 3. For some reason only the small rails with small spacing appear under the left wing, causing Python 3 missiles to just hang in mid-air. I checked the out file and also the data.ini, but could not see the cause of this issue. -
F-14A/B/D HELP!
Svetlin replied to AMBUDU's topic in Thirdwire: Strike Fighters 2 Series - General Discussion
In that case follow Spectre8750's advice. -
F-14A/B/D HELP!
Svetlin replied to AMBUDU's topic in Thirdwire: Strike Fighters 2 Series - General Discussion
It seems to me, that you are using SF2:NA adjusted aircraft in a non SF2:NA game. Which game of the SF2 series are you playing? -
[WIP]The Scandinavian Front New Aircraft Teaser
Svetlin replied to JonathanRL's topic in Thirdwire: Strike Fighters 2 Series - Mods & Skinning Discussion
He is talking about the one on the vertical tail, Cocas. On the AJ-37 (ground attack aircraft) it is placed close to the top of the vertical tail, like on this model. On the JA-37 (fighter aircraft) it is placed almost in the middle of the vertical tail front. Basically the model at its current stage of development is closer to AJ-37, rather than JA-37, that's all.