Svetlin

Here they are. I just deleted the specific station code entry. RPK10.zip

I just downloaded TMF Mirage 5BA from the SFP1 downloads section and there is no RPK10 included, neither as a built-in rack (like the stock Mirage 5BA has), nor as a separate weapon. I also checked one of TMF weapons packs and found 2 versions of the RPK10 in it. M3_RPK_C M3_RPK_V As far as I can see, the difference is that the M3_RPK_V has the pylon built-in, whereas the M3_RPK_C does not have a pylon. I made a quick test with the M3_RPK_C and it shows just fine in game on TMF Mirage 5BA without any modification to SF2 standards (just for the test): All I did was: 1. Add SpecificStationCode=RPK10 in the M3_RPK_C_Data.ini file. 2. Edit the weapon stations of the TMF Mirage 5BA as follows: [LeftWingIntStation] SystemType=WEAPON_STATION StationID=3 StationGroupID=2 StationType=EXTERNAL AttachmentPosition=-2.155,-1.6,-0.805 AttachmentAngles=0.0,0.0,0.0 LoadLimit=1000 AllowedWeaponClass=BOMB,RP,TER,BFT AttachmentType=FRANCE,NATO ModelNodeName=LeftInnerPylone PylonMass=72.58 PylonDragArea=0.02 RackSpecificStationCode=RPK10 [RightWingIntStation] SystemType=WEAPON_STATION StationID=4 StationGroupID=2 StationType=EXTERNAL AttachmentPosition=2.155,-1.6,-0.805 AttachmentAngles=0.0,0.0,0.0 LoadLimit=1000 AllowedWeaponClass=BOMB,RP,TER,BFT AttachmentType=FRANCE,NATO ModelNodeName=RightInnerPylone PylonMass=72.58 PylonDragArea=0.02 RackSpecificStationCode=RPK10 I used the specific station code entry to make sure I am getting exactly the M3_RPK_C model loaded for the purposes of the test. Please ignore the fact that the RPK10 appears hanging in the air with no pylon. I just made a quick test to make sure the model shows up in the game and did not take care of which weapon station or which RPK10 version (with or without pylon) I was using. Hope the above helps.

A Grumman A-6A Intruder of attack squadron VA-165 Boomers from the aircraft carrier USS Ranger (CVA-61), armed with two AIM-9D Sidewinder air-to-air missiles on the inboard pylons. VA-165 was assigned to Attack Carrier Air Wing Two (CVW-2) from 4 November 1967 to 25 May 1968 to Vietnam:

Yes, both:

IMHO, the problem is with the pylons - they are a bit too high indeed. The cutout in the flap is there. If one would check the last but one picture and compare with the last one, one would definitely see the pylons are a bit too high. Just compare the position of right inner pylon lowest point at the front against the right main gear door as reference.

I guess you are talking about the Matra JL-100: Available thanks to Ravenclaw of course and this is the data ini: [WeaponData001] TypeName=JL-100 FullName=Matra JL-100 Rocket Pod ModelName=JL-100 Mass=422.500000 Diameter=0.410000 Length=4.449000 SubsonicDragCoeff=0.174000 SupersonicDragCoeff=0.514200 AttachmentType=FRANCE SpecificStationCode= NationName=FRANCE StartYear=1965 EndYear=0 Availability=3 BaseQuantity=4 Exported=TRUE ExportStartYear=1965 ExportEndYear=0 ExportAvailability=3 WeaponDataType=2 RailLaunched=FALSE RocketTypeName=SNEB68 NumRockets=18 ROF=18.000000 FireEffectName= FireEffectTime=0.150000 FrontCoverNodeName=Cover_Front RearCoverNodeName= ShowRockets=TRUE MirrorOffset=FALSE MaxFuelAmount=216.000000 Rocket01Position=-0.040000,1.411000,0.149000 Rocket02Position=0.039000,1.411000,-0.150000 Rocket03Position=-0.109000,1.411000,0.109000 Rocket04Position=0.109000,1.411000,-0.109000 Rocket05Position=-0.150000,1.411000,0.039000 Rocket06Position=0.149000,1.411000,-0.040000 Rocket07Position=-0.149000,1.411000,-0.040000 Rocket08Position=0.149000,1.411000,0.040000 Rocket09Position=-0.109000,1.411000,-0.109000 Rocket10Position=0.109000,1.411000,0.109000 Rocket11Position=-0.041000,1.411000,-0.149000 Rocket12Position=0.040000,1.411000,0.149000 Rocket13Position=-0.038000,1.662000,0.066000 Rocket14Position=0.038000,1.662000,-0.066000 Rocket15Position=-0.076000,1.662000,0.000000 Rocket16Position=0.075000,1.662000,-0.001000 Rocket17Position=-0.038000,1.662000,-0.066000 Rocket18Position=0.038000,1.662000,0.066000 In the aircraft data.ini, in the respective weapons station entry you have to add AllowedWeaponClass=RFT

A walkaround of an A-6A modified into an A-6E is available here: https://www.net-maquettes.com/pictures/grumman-a-6a-intruder-walkaround/ Just keep pressing "Load More" after the first 9 pictures as the walkaround contains a total of 157 images.

Hi, GKABS, hope you will be able to implement the different configurations of the Aero 1D 300-gal drop tank. Aero 1D single fin (to be loaded under the wings of the A-6A/B/C): Aero 1D with 2 fins (to be loaded on the centerline station under the fuselage during the early years of A-6 operations): Aero 1D with NO fins (to be loaded on the centerline station under the fuselage during the later years of A-6 operations): The models are not mine, but by one of the well-known, kind and generous modders here at CA and I am showing these only to illustrate my point.

The Scandinavian Front with the Viggen family included is available here at CA, but yes, a Viggen is not available as a standalone download, one has to download the full Scandinavian Front mod to get access to the Viggen. Unless I am mistaken, the Viggen family models were touched a bit by Ravenclaw at some point, so even if these and the DAT one originate from the same source file (which I am not sure they do), the models in the Scandinavian Front should not be affected by the said politics.

I support both an improved A-6 family (A-6A, A-6B, A-6C, KA-6D, A-6E, EA-6A, EA-6B) and a Viggen family (AJ-37, JA-37, SF-37, SH-37, SK-37, JA-37D). The stock A-6 has issues with the pylons - wrong size and shape. The drop tanks are wrong in size as well. The Viggen family available in the Scandinavian Front mod has issues with the control surfaces - these do not work correctly and I fear that may be more than just an issue with the data.ini.

For this one, yes please, so it could be properly loaded under the EA-6B wings (on the stock EA-6B model, the attachment extension is part of the ALQ-99 pod, not part of the pylon, so if we replaced the stock ALQ-99 with your better looking one, we would need the attachment extension): For this one, not necessary, because if I understand correctly, this version is loaded predominantly on the centerline station without attachment extension:

I know it is being frowned upon making requests to modders and I apologize in advance, but GKABS, could you make an ALQ-99 dedicated model for the EA-6B? You have the pod, all that is missing is an adapter to be added:

Yep, that one in SEA camo wrap-around scheme is in the pack as well.

Yes, just as Soulfreak said, that skin is in the Ravenvclaw's F-4E ANG and AFRES pack, it is available for the F-4E_85_ANG.

Hoping for a TAV-8B in 2024... (from my letter to Santa )

I am no expert, but it looks to me more real like this: To my knowledge, the gun camera is more or less on the center line in the cockpit, while the Pitot tube is offset to the right on the nose, so probably the picture was inverted at some point (if it is real).

Hi ravenclaw, have you by chance worked on a BRU-55/57 model for weaponspack 3?

A Finn over Germany in special colors. The bird required some minor finetuning as well - wheels rolling radius, front tires size (too low profile originally), some weapons attachment positions (weapons sitting too far back on the pylons).

Was the Swiss Mirage IIIS the best looking Mirage III? I think so.

Nose jobs - Israeli style. The TC2 though does not look that bad.

Looking at your updates on the Typhoon and the Rafale, GKABS, makes me wish Qatar bought a few Gripens too

Iron Eagle and Flight of Black Angel may have been rather lame movies, but they got me somewhat obsessed with the Kfir. What if Israel kept the Kfir in its C.10 and TC.10 variants.

Guys, would anyone please kindly share a proper F/A-18B/D template? I know the F/A-18A template is a close fit, but the B/D Hornet models deserve better. Thank you!