Jump to content

Svetlin

SENIOR MEMBER
  • Content count

    868
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Everything posted by Svetlin

  1. Actually, Meteor appears to be just 1 cm (0.39 of an inch) longer than the AMRAAM, i.e. 3.67m for the Meteor against 3.66m for the AMRAAM. That's what the sources I found say: http://www.mbda-systems.com/mbda/site/ref/...amp;page_id=105 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AIM-120_AMRAAM So I guess it won't be much trouble in terms of size to fit the Meteor in places, where the AMRAAM already fits To Spiff, a quote from the first site: "It is being integrated on Europe’s major platforms, Eurofighter Typhoon, Gripen and Rafale. It also has the potential to add to the air-to-air capability of other combat platforms including the F-35 Lightning II. The METEOR programme sees the UK, France, Germany, Italy, Spain and Sweden joining together in order to provide access to technology and expertise across Europe." As FC said, it's all about a simple ini editing to add the METEOR in the Loadout file. Realism is another issue Svetlin
  2. Great build, Veltro, thanks! Just a small question. I cannot find migtank.bmp (the texture for MiG31tank) in the folders. I wonder is it just me or may be it was left out on purpose? Best Regards, Svetlin
  3. R-60M

    Did you place the MiG in a clean install of the game or in the one you have already "played" with? May be it will better to start back from the beginning - remove the game, then reinstall it, install the weapons pack and then new aircraft. I have just installed the MiG in a newly reinstalled version (cause I messed up my previous install), patched up to the latest available patch and it work just fine...
  4. R-60M

    Another MiG fan says hello You need to open the *data.ini file in the aricraft's folder and edit for each weapon station the line AttachmentType= If I am not mistaken, by default you should see AttachmentType=WP, make it AttachmentType=WP,SOVIET
  5. Hi krizis, hope I am not pushing my luck with this question. Have you made./considered making the Su-17/22 reccon pod - KKR-1/54? As far as I know no one has modeled it yet...
  6. Can't wait, my hands are getting wet and shaking
  7. Let's not forget the aircraft should actually have the necessary free space for the retracting probe mechanism. If the initial design project did not include a retractable probe, it may have been difficult later to rearrange the equipment on bord to fit one in. What's more, a removable instead of a retractable refuling probe may sometimes be an advantage.
  8. Take a look here: http://www.centurychina.com/cgi-bin/anyboa...s=tK-yVz-aO-hKz Each link leads to a set of photos. Some show a retired J-10B prototype with weps load. By the looks of it I'd say the B type has the same number of hardpoints as the A type.
  9. EricJ, did you find out what the problem with the shadow is and how it can be fixed? I also face some strange shadow effects with this "bird".
  10. Chinese Guys has smth new?

    Well, the link I posted about the JH-7 says, the aircraft is planned to be equipped with multifunction radar, providing air-to-air combat capabalities to the aircraft. I am not saying that's 100%, but that's just what the article says. And, yes, I can read, understand and also speak Russian a little
  11. Chinese Guys has smth new?

    I'd say JH-7: http://www.airwar.ru/enc/fighter/jh7.html, loaded with PL-12: http://www.airwar.ru/weapon/avv/pl12.html and TY-90: http://www.airwar.ru/weapon/avv/ty90.html
  12. F-35C: Length - 15.5m Height - 4.6m Wingspan - 13.1m Source: http://www.airforce-technology.com/projects/jsf/specs.html F-18C/D: Length - 17.1m Height - 4.7m Wingspan - 12.3m Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F-18 Best Regards, Svetlin
  13. That's becoming like a torture by the medieval Spanish Inquisition, or should I say modern Chinese Inquisition??? Another great one, do you plan to release is here? Best Regards, Svetlin
  14. Anything to do with a song named "That's The Way It's Going To Be", may be??? P.S. Just a wild guess, seemed spot on initially.
  15. Excuse me guys, if I may: http://paralay.com/ Some nice drawings of PAK-FA and other goodies there :yes:
  16. :yes: , anti-tank guided rockets.
  17. I have noticed almost the same. Almost, because I have noticed that LGB guidance is OK only when you drop them from a very close distance (say less than 5 km from target)... Not sure about the case in real life. I mean, are LGBs really dropped from a longer distance, say 15-25 or even 30 km away from target???
  18. No need to do that. Just place the extracted file in the correct folder. The CAT extractor does not delete files from the cat. It simply makes a copy of the file you need extracted. Now, seriously, take a look the knowledge base. All that's been said already. Many more interesting things in there as well. :yes: Best Regards, Svetlin
  19. You should use a cat extract utility. Check this out: http://forum.combatace.com/index.php?autoc...mp;showfile=343 Oh, and do spend some time reading in the knowledge base. Best Regards, Svetlin
  20. Hi Erwin, waiting with hands on throttle and stick Hope it is closer than the usual "two weeks" Great job, by the way! Best Regards, Svetlin
  21. Hello guys, Does anybody have the F-16 CFTs painted for a USAF aircraft (in Dark Sea/Gull Grey colour)? Is it possible to share/upload? I would like to fit the Blck50/52 F-16 with CFTs Thank you! P.S. I've been trying for 2 days in my free time already to make the skin myself, yet I am ashamed of the result so far Best Regards, Svetlin
  22. Very good looking! Will you release it?
×

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..