Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
ghostrider883

Pakistan's Answer to IAF's Phalcon AWACS

Recommended Posts

314oumu.jpg

m7wfpi.jpg

dxizgg.jpg

 

Pakistan's first of five Saab 2000-based airborne early warning and control system aircraft was rolled out at the Swedish manufacturer's Linköping facility late last month.

 

Equipped with a Saab Microwave Systems Erieye surveillance radar, mission system and electronic warfare equipment, the Saab Aerotech-modified aircraft will offer an unrefuelled endurance of over nine hours. "This is a vital item of equipment to maintain peace," Pakistan air force chief of staff Air Chief Marshal Tanvir Mahmood Ahmed said during a 27 March ceremony.

 

Pakistan in mid-2006 became the first customer to select a Saab 2000-based Erieye surveillance system, with deliveries expected from next year under a deal worth around SKr7 billion ($1.2 billion). Erieye-equipped Saab 340s are already in use by Brazil, Greece, Mexico and Sweden, with one of the type also recently ordered by Thailand.

Edited by ghostrider883

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i don't understand why some aircrafts still being desgined with prop engines.. :|

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
i don't understand why some aircrafts still being desgined with prop engines.. :|

 

We have no need for your fancy pants jet engines, western infidels!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
i don't understand why some aircrafts still being desgined with prop engines.. :|

 

 

Propellers are still significantly more efficient than turbojets or turbofans, since its based on a civvie plane that has no need to go supersonic, turboprops are more economical

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

preffer mine :p

R_99_A_2.jpg

 

but...

they did with popelers,maybe to save fuel or a quick airbone allert system??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It depends on what you want from the flight profiles. Props advantages are longer endurance/less fuel burn. Turbojets/fans lets you go faster and higher and can prove less fatiguing to the crew, depending on the type of engine.

 

Besides, it's still a jet. The ONLY part that is different is the front. Instead of a prop, you put a far smaller diameter fan or series of fans inside a duct and you get more thrust for less effeciency. Piston engines are relegated to only the very small planes now, like the ones that hold 6 people max.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

its a turbo prop. They are very reliable, with a prop they can change pitch on the propellers for more or less bite kinda like using a hi gear on the highway. more bite on the prop less turbine speed. Adds Bookoo time to loitering which is great for a plane like this.

 

 

 

i don't understand why some aircrafts still being desgined with prop engines.. :|

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..