Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  

Wikipedia shortcomings

Recommended Posts

I was sending a friend a link about cluster bombs and went to the usually reliable wikipedia. I was astonished to find that the article on the CBU-24 was two sentences long, and no images.


Horrified, I did some hasty research and added some more detail, but I was surprised at this gap in what must be an interesting set of topics. If the entries in wikipedia are inadequate, can we, as a community with a wealth of knowledge, help out? I am not just thinking of CBU-24s but of all modern aircraft weapons systems.


Pick your favourite and have a look. If it isn't covered, or not covered well, help to update it. AAMs appear to be well covered, as are SAM systems, but I am guessing air-to-mud might have a lot of holes we could help fill.


And does anyone have any images of CBU-24s? I came up dry. The image needs to be your own copyright, or public domain. Does the US military make public domain images available?

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  


Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..