Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Fates

F-35 engine fight gives rivals sense of deja vu

Recommended Posts

gallery_1_54_25396.jpg

 

For years, top U.S. Defense Department officials have tried to cancel the F136 engine being developed by GE and Britain's Rolls-Royce Group PLC (RR.L) as an alternative to the F135 engine built by Pratt & Whitney, a unit of United Technologies Corp (UTX.N). Then each year, Congress has defied veto threats and White House pressure to keep the program alive.

 

The struggle has taken on new significance this year, amid a major Pentagon cost-cutting push and growing concern among lawmakers about widening U.S. deficits.

 

"We've nicknamed ourselves the Groundhog Day program. Come February we get to do it again," Russell Sparks, vice president of military strategy at GE Aviation, told the Reuters Aerospace and Defense Summit.

 

David Hess, president of Pratt & Whitney, said the comedy movie "Groundhog Day," starring Bill Murray, provided an apt analogy for the fight over funding for a second engine for the F-35 fighter, built by Lockheed Martin Corp (LMT.N).

 

In that film, Murray plays a television weatherman who wakes up to relive the same day, February 2, over and over again.

 

"There is a bit of a 'Groundhog Day' feel to it," Hess told the Reuters Summit. "You know, we've been battling this for 4 years and for 4 years we've had a customer who says he doesn't want it, and for 4 years Congress has put it back in. So it does seem to be deja vu all over again."

 

Together the two companies have at least 33 lobbyists working on the issue, according to an analysis by the Center for Public Integrity, a nonpartisan watchdog group.

 

Read More: http://www.reuters.c...E68802820100909

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nope, this is totally separate. None of the testing is relying on this engine.

 

Unfortunately for P&W, the F136 looks to be coming out better than the F135. More power, more margin for growth, etc. While it could still be cancelled, it looks like it may be the superior engine in the long run.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Certainly seems like Groundhog Day to me. Pratt and Whitney gets the initial contract, then GE develops a more powerful/reliable engine, then that engine gets threatened to be cut, but winds up being selected in the end. Kind of like the F-101/-110 and its derivatives that wound up in the F-14, F-15, and F-16.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..