Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I would suggest the number 39 (that is the one after the Phantom), 42 (after Alpha Jet), or any number between 47 and 50 (after Tornado) – depending on when you plan to introduce the Falcon to W-Germany.

 

There are several options for Marineflieger camouflages:

Norm 76 from 1976-1987:

http://www.panzerfux...1600311_b_1.JPG

http://www.modellver...-hobbyboss.html

(these are from MFG 1 though)

http://www.jpsmodell.../n76mff104g.jpg

 

Norm 1987 from 1987 on:

http://www.modellver...ds-italeri.html

http://www.jpsmodell...aw/n87e_tor.jpg

 

AND, since this is a what-if, you could also take on an experimental camouflage:

http://www.jpsmodell...raw/tor4385.jpg

 

 

Re Sparrow: Our F-4F was physically capable of carrying Sparrows but not more, since the wiring inside was gone. The Phantom just had to mop-up what SAMs and USAF did not kill, therefore the Sparrow was deemed unnecessary. Moreover, these were the early seventies and the Sparrows performance was less than thrilling even in its improved iterations. Considering the airspace over Germany would be a hell of a lot more cluttered and chaotic I also have my doubts about its usefulness in WWIII.

Posted

I created a full set of decals with the number 47 ranging from 47+01 to 47+99, which means that the plane will be introduced after the Tornado. Same means that the Norm 71 will be dropped and replaced by the upcoming Marineflieger skin in basaltgrau and lichtgrau

Posted (edited)

F-16A - Marinefliegergeschwader 2 - German Navy

 

img00003.png

 

img00004.png

 

img00002.png

 

I'm still thinking of adding some orange to the wingtips and the fuel tanks to give it a more similar appearance to the Marine Starfighters.

Edited by ValAstur
  • Like 4
Posted

Looks nice in these colours! Dayglow high visibility markings were not used much in the Navy past the Starfighter, but I would not mind - just to see how they'd look on the Falcon :D

Posted

Hmmm... I just checked the files. Everythings fine. Dunno where the prob might be. Everything copied correctly? Better double check.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..