Jump to content

ravenclaw_007

+MODDER
  • Content count

    3,851
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    247

Posts posted by ravenclaw_007


  1. Du sprichst mir aus der Seele. Solche Vollpfosten sind leider inzwischen gasförmig (also maximalverteilt) im ganzen Land unterwegs.

     

    Da wird dann gegen alles geklagt, was Veränderung oder (Schreck!) gar Fortschritt bringt. Ob das nun ein Bahnhof in Stuttgart, ein Flughafen in Berlin und Frankfurt, oder eine Hochspannungstrasse für den "Grünen Strom von der Nordsee" in Kleinschilda ist.

     

    Ich denke inzwischen öfter ans Auswandern...

     

    lass es dir von jemanden sagen der schon 10 jahre im ausland gelebt hat es ist überall das selbe

     

    und zum thema Bahnhof in Stuttgart (ich wohne in der nähe) kann ich nur sagen veränderung ?: ja das bringt er , fortschritt ?: nein das bringt er nicht , und nach der neuesten kosten explosion muss ich sagen das die recht hatten die schon immer gesagt haben das es um den angegebenen preis nicht zu machen ist aber was sind heute schon 1-2 milliarden euros , nur noch kleingeld


  2. i just fix the new F-4M by moving the entire model 2.6 meters an move the fuselage pivot piont back to 0.0 and set the CG to 0.0 , i changed all

    - MIN/MaxExtentPosition

    - CollisionPoin

    - VortexPosition

    - ExhaustPosition

    - AttachmentPosition

    - Light Position

    in the data_ini and the cockpit position in the Cockpit_ini

     

     

    i just dont know if i have to change some of the FM data as well , but so far the aircraft is flying ok , now i still have to change the new F-4E and F-4F


  3. i just check that and yes thats it , if i set the CG to 0.0 all is ok but now the aircraft is no longer sitting on its landing gear but on the main gear and tail

     

    on the new F-4E/F and M the CG is moved even more to 0.0,2.60, 0.0. so the aircraft sit correcet on the main landing gear and not as on the TW F-4´s with the nose up

     

    so now i have to find a way to get the CG to 0.0


  4. that is intresting did you try it with other TW F-4´s ???? what patch level do you use ????

     

    Sundowner and i have this problem in fact Sundowner was the one who discovered it i did not realy notice it before , i try now all F-4´s and i dont have a single one with out this problem even the RF-4E has it

     

    the funy thing is that the RF-4E and the new F-4E/F and F-4M dont use the stock TW drop tanks and the pylons are new as well and still the problem is there


  5. i don't know the first thing about FMs so I am talking out my butt but do droptanks have an entry for drag or something similar? if so maybe it's wrong in some way and making the drop tanks go faster? just a guess.

     

    i changed the value for the drag but no change they still jump forward , and i posted it at the TW forum but as usual no answer i dont know why i still try it anyway


  6. that is what was thinking to i would say eject-position but how can i change that ??? a entry in the data_ini does not work

     

    even moving some pivot points has no effect

     

     

    still after droping them they jump forward and as i mention above even stock TW F-4´s have this problem

     

    i was locking for a pivot point that may rest in.this position but i could not find any , i moved the pivot point of the wings but no change

     

    post-15260-0-84412400-1355982910_thumb.jpg


  7. i agree with Brain the plane sits too low , as for the DB-110 dimensions it could be that the pod is here or there a bit of , i had only very limited info material on the DB-110 , my only reference are the measurments i took from the pictures i have , sorry but that is the only way i could make that pod

     

    to change this the F-16 needs a new and more correct landing gear , we decided not to cange it because of the work and time it would need to do that , today i regret that decision


  8. the C version was in service but the B did not enter

     

    about the missile effectiveness , i will not work on missile effectiveness if somebody else will do that its ok with me and i think that it matters what SF2 patch version you have , on my test with the AIM-7M i had only 1 hit from 4 missiles fired

     

    an other thing i notice is that most aircraft Data_ini must be changed because the missiles position is mostly rotated by 45° on both sides of the aircraft but it should be

    45° on the left side

    - 45° on the right side

    that is something you could not see with the old missiles but with the new ones you will see that the mounting /guiding bracket are pointing in the wrong direction :grin:

     

    F-15A Sparrow Station

    [sparrowStation1]

    SystemType=WEAPON_STATION

    StationID=4

    StationGroupID=3

    StationType=SEMI_RECESSED

    AttachmentPosition=-1.63,1.84,-0.80

    AttachmentAngles=-1.0,0.0,0.0

    MissileRollAngle=45.0

    EjectVelocity=0.0,0.0,-2.0

    LoadLimit=231.5

    AllowedWeaponClass=SAHM

    AttachmentType=NATO,USAF

     

    [sparrowStation2]

    SystemType=WEAPON_STATION

    StationID=5

    StationGroupID=3

    StationType=SEMI_RECESSED

    AttachmentPosition=1.63,1.84,-0.80

    AttachmentAngles=1.0,0.0,0.0

    MissileRollAngle=-45.0

    EjectVelocity=0.0,0.0,-2.0

    LoadLimit=231.5

    AllowedWeaponClass=SAHM

    AttachmentType=NATO,USAF

     

    [sparrowStation3]

    SystemType=WEAPON_STATION

    StationID=6

    StationGroupID=3

    StationType=SEMI_RECESSED

    AttachmentPosition=-1.47,-1.85,-0.80

    AttachmentAngles=-2.0,-2.0,0.0

    MissileRollAngle=45.0

    EjectVelocity=0.0,0.0,-2.0

    LoadLimit=231.5

    AllowedWeaponClass=SAHM

    AttachmentType=NATO,USAF

     

    [sparrowStation4]

    SystemType=WEAPON_STATION

    StationID=7

    StationGroupID=3

    StationType=SEMI_RECESSED

    AttachmentPosition=1.47,-1.85,-0.80

    AttachmentAngles=2.0,-2.0,0.0

    MissileRollAngle=-45.0

    EjectVelocity=0.0,0.0,-2.0

    LoadLimit=231.5

    AllowedWeaponClass=SAHM

    AttachmentType=NATO,USAF

     

    wrong missile position on the right side with the original data_ini

    post-15260-0-98997300-1355938965_thumb.jpg

     

    and the correct missile postion with the changed data from above

    post-15260-0-81380700-1355939071_thumb.jpg

×

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..