macelena

Don't start folks...if I think I see a USAF/USN "whose **** is bigger" thread start, I'll shut down this thread.

BECAUSE MINE IS DA BIGGEST

Sorry, i couldn´t avoid it

A UK lo ponen de aliado, neutral, o enemigo? (queremos el peñon!!! queremos el peñon!!!! queremos mas paella!!! queremos mas paella!!!! Carlos es un gil!!!! Carlos es un gil!!!)

 

Pobre Marruecos che, que les hizo?? algun dictador de por ahi cerca no hay? alguno a quien no estaria mal reventarlo a palos digo...

Pregunte si querian participar, pero no dijeron nada, así que se quedarían fuera.

Repite este mantra conmigo, Pato "marruecosesmalo, marruecosesmalo, marruecosesmalo"

Dan el coñazo con Ceuta, Melilla y las Canarias, pero la de hostias que se llevarían si intentan algo

con ellas iban a dejar la derrota que se llevaron Uds en Mavinas a la altura de una bofetada

Una cosa, no se que pasa que a veces los aviones rivales no llevan ningún misil, y no lo acabo de entender, no se, cuando vuelo con ellos (Mig, Su, etc) no tengo ese problema.

GRACIAS.

Puede pasar que uses un pack de armas distinto. En loadout ini aparecen con nombre ruso, y con los de mirage factory tienen que ser

con denominacion OTAN (p ej. R-77= AA-10, pero comprueba en WEAPONSDATA.ini los "typename")

Bueno, dado que olvide ponerlo aquí, estoy viendo si puedo sacar un Mod con las

fuerzas aéreas de España y Portugal, con algunos enemigos. Wrench tiene el terreno (la peninsula y el norte de África),

y pretendo reunir los aviones necesarios para ello. Si alguno tiene algo que decir, soy todo oídos

esta un poco muy muerto, aqui el link en Inglés http://forum.combatace.com/index.php?showtopic=36781

Hope this hasn't confused or discouraged you.

Erm, 50%.Easy to confuse, hard to discourage I´ll do it ASAP. Thanks a lot

The engine understands aerodynamics just fine.

 

What it won't understand is fly by wire. You could put in the real values of the F-16 or Typhoon. But then you couldn't fly it (and the AI definitely couldn't) because computers fly the aircraft in real life because they are unstable.

 

So, we have to compensate in the TW engine by 'fudging' the values to make it flyable. But it also means you won't necessarily get the max performance of the aircraft that you would actually get in real life.

 

As far as what you're trying to do, I've mixed and matched parts before...but it's definitely trial and error (usually a lot of error) before I get something passable. Unless one of the FM masters pipes in here, expect a steep learning curve.

 

FC

I´ll try, thanks, sir

Te toca bajarte el mod malvinas. Mira en campañas, y te viene, pero no va suelto, y con

"skin" argentina, solamente (no se de donde seras, pero tal vez baste) Si quieres mas "skin",

las hay de Iraq y de la Marine Nationale

Gina's napalm fury

Love that smell, folk

Bombcat:

Jealous

Yours got a nice 40mm add-on, IIRC

This is the Spanish Air Force F-5A, wich, if everything goes well, would be released in an Iberian Mod

Skin by 3-A-305, modified by me, on the Mirage Factory model

PS: Sorry for Drop Tanks, it would be fixed

Thanks, m8. Yes, i tried. I put F-16 values for EF-2000 (wich seems not to maneuver well in my PC)

but it didn´t work. I think that engine must have some trouble understanding the aerodynamics of 4.5 gen fighters

or kind of.

Perhaps i should edit values for the control surfaces? How should i do it, then?

I'm starting to like the F-104, it's great as long as you know how to use it!

True words for a wise man, dude

I would like for one of my aircraft to behave another way,

and i tried to change values at data.ini, but it flies the same way. Is there

a way to use an aircraft´s flight characteristics in another aircraft?

Flights along border - ABSOLUTELY NORMAL and LAWFUL ACTION. I have a big archive of radar images of Norway, China, Ukraine, India, Pakistan, Estonia, Latvia, Kazakhstan, Finland on range to 350km from the border, made during time tests our new airplanes.

I even got some photos from Tu-95, wich under the Open Skies treaty overflew Rota Naval Base and air station, and sent us

the recon photos showing the whole base. And our C-130 Hercules (I mean from several european nations) use to fly over murmansk

and some other russian facilities taking pics and scanning the surrounding area.

Either i was surprised by the importance given to this new. I don´t think that RCAF should be afraid or upset by this.

Im having to wait until terrain is done with the Iberian Mod, so i guess you can count me in for

this for anything i can be of help.

if an id(io)t tail gunner does so, immagine a smart one :)

Perhaps the MiG pilot was worse

Legalization of drugs is supposed to have some advantages: first of all, the

money flow to the State, by taxes or by dealing. Other would be that drugs would

be of a better quality, controlled by health departments. It would screw up with

dealers, and given that most of robbery and a lot of violent crimes are related to drugs are

claimed to be solved this way,this solution has been proposed frequently.

I´m not such optimistic. As Verve said "Drugs don´t work"

By Dave

 

That's kinda pathetic when you're painting a simulated kill marking on your plane...

Seems we are not the first forum members to see this

IIRC, once, a Sa´ar shot down a mig trough a cloud with a Shafrir1 or 2. I´m not sure,

but i think that something like this happened in the falklands war.

The fact is that clouds affect IR lock, but not as dramatically as some slight change in speed or

aspect angle if we talk about early, rear only aspect IRMs. I would just care about tracking them

until you get tone.

"Make me a weather prayer"

RIP to british troopers.

EricJ, should be glad that such lot of people cares about you

AMI lost ONE tornado, out of 10 deployed in the area.

Also no battledamage has been reported

10% of the force is too much. If it could have been avoided(i don´t blame AMI, RAF had the same percentage, IIRC), it should already had been in doctrine.

Another example could have been the Mirage 2000N lost in Bihac (IIRC the town). After ours of SEAD by usn, usmc

and spanish hornets, they flew low enough to get the threat wich can´t be sweeped by SEAD: Sa-7. I don´t

know if it was a limitation due to the weather in wich the operation runned, if the N version had to get that low to deliver

accurately the weapons.

Flying low is BAD. But also too malish

Did you know that Buccaneer pilots used to use the Royal Automobile Club annual roadmaps as their air navigation maps?

 

I did hear a true story about when the Buccs got to the sandpit in '91 that they knew they were flying low enough when truck drivers kept flashing their headlights at them to get out the way. Pukka gen that is.

That´s true. Also Mirage F-1 pilots used to fly under highway bridges, wich explains their brutal attrition, including a recent incident.

Jags were meant to do the same, but i´m not sure why, they ended up doing not.

About tornados, i heard about some exercises in wich a flight of GR1A, trying to hit a dam in rough terrain, were decimated until the

mission was aborted, by a Mistral SAM battery. It seems from ODS, but it happened in 1988. If NATO learnt of his experiences, the

casualties by tornado units from RAF and AMI in Desert Storm would have been so high.

So stop moving mud and just try to make it on and back

They got his legs, but he kept his balls

Here at the forum, muesli is also going back after being WIA, i myself

could once meet a Marine who lets a foot to a AP mine in Bosnia, 1995, and he is still

teaching in the Marine School. Or another paratrooper,a sargent whose vehicle was struck by IED,

was burnt and lost one of his men, afghanistan 2006, and he is back to work with his new face.

For these people, it is to hard to recover, but they keep struggling just as in the battlefield. The

least they can earn is our respect, and gratitude. Our help will be OK, but we should take care

not to offence by acting like they were useless or unable to get rolling by themselves