daddyairplanes

looks like the rotorwash broke off some limbs, wonder why they had folks in the flight path of the insertion though.

i would likely say not, as in anytime you will not have an exact count on enemy strength. hell half the Migs and tanks destroyed on the ground during Allied Force/ Kosovo turned out to be wooden mockups heated to simulate infrared signatures for NATO targeting pods. personally i was unaware you could get intel on the otherside in map, wonder if it transfers to SF2 tis capablity

start at 2LT, work up to GEN, then cycle back down to SGT!

they dont want to fall behind the swedes in capability:lol: :lol: http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=bf7_1292774776

when i was with a field artillery unit in Germany, had a Platoon Sergeant who used to say that all we needed the officers for was "ink" (their signatres on paperwork). i have met a few good ones over the years, most of those were NCO's that went OCS or ROTC for more money less labor though.

1 hows that rwr_tail mesh fit in on the decal.ini? and 2 anyone told Dave so he can add this to the bug list 3 having looked at the skins for the 'C_67 it has the rwr antenea on the brake chute housing in back stock. if your using antenea for the ER-142 why not use the stock ones instead. if that is stock then time to ask WTF

I am working on all Phantom users post vietnam using similar logic (all refer to a F4_Black folder for Euro 1 and SEA Wraparound) and have the exact same prob. i keep thinkin about mppd's Loran F-4D's in the gen 1 d/l section they have blister "covers" for that area but i haven't tried it out yet. to busy renumbering my Phantom decals every time a new patch or NF4+ patch comes out:grin: still nice to know i'm not a complete idiot on why i cant get that to look right nice Wild Weasel IV btw only other user i recall is the 81st TFW up until they upgraded to the F-4G, maybe a couple at George AFB for training

puts an inner tube and 69 Chevelle to shame fer sure!

sure i do. make it into target patterns for the SF2 Range:lol: :lol:

yes in NATO Fighters 4+

well the Mi-8 still works in all conditions. blades a little better defined but from my memory of the russian contractor flying 10 ft over my truck i could count the blades very well thank you!

no where near the experience to help, but lookin at the list.... i love you man!

ok got it eyes going getting old roger out:lol: still looks good even with my lack of visual acuity, after KAW could be a market for T-33 skins as ANG squadron hacks!

http://www.youtube.c...e&v=lyhaTQseKTQ

but i have vista and it shows in high FPS situations (engaging enemy forces, low level around an airfield) but is normal otherwise (cruising to the objective at altitude) could this info be of any use, or am i screwy like usual? and no, my options ini doesnt force DX9.

are my eyes finally going or is the center rib on the T-33 canopy (in Dave's above screenie) extending past the glass?

this is 2010. there are no dragons. post this at the wall instead

dont encourage them:lol:

this is why servicemembers are not allowed to drnk in theater anymore:rofl:

As to the Harrier great Aircraft saved my hide on a couple of occasions to say the least... remember seeing it overhead at kandaher every day for the first half of my year there, you guys didn't fly then as low and obnoxiously as the Marines did when they took over. course almost took a Marine AV-8 out with a flashlight but thats a story for another day......

guess the RN can't toast "damn the french " anymore:rofl: seriously tho, some of our folks here accuse pres obama of working to destroy the country and the military . it seems your guys are much more up to the job for the UK! 12,000 jobs lost in middle of a recession, capable CAS aircraft lost when your troops are in combat, and by what i remember of one of your nuc subs, the drivers are getting certified online!

heres one main game related..... anyone else notice that with the mission editor, object years go out the window? Meteor F8 can go on an anti ship mission against CVA-63 or anti tank against T-72's all of which I am sure were not available in 1956! it's cool to place what you want but within a little reason here:yikes:

hmmm Omani Jaguar, Saudi Lightning, both with heavy RAF support:grin:

whats sad is that didn't you guys just finish a major upgrade on the GR9's? the platforms were bought and paid for and could have provided CAS for your troops for years to come. unlike Typhoon or Tornado the Harrier was designed for that, although admittedly expecting to operate out of clearings while engaging Soviet armor. anyone who thinks they will save more money to axe a whole fleet of planes should look up this little american program............ i believe its called the B-52!