daddyairplanes

80s 70s 60s

you will be releasing a pack right or at least some screenies on 99 with the history of RAF 117s over the Balkans

nah, with them tail fins, definetly Chevys or Caddies mandatory screenie (of an in game shot)

send up some more balloons.....

back at home....

“Dear Ron, I was immensely impressed by your splendid achievement: three cheers for AmericaI was also very touched by the generosity of the offer of participation which Cap brought. It brings home once again who our real friends are… I am so much looking forward to seeing you in Tokyo. With warmest best wishes, yours sincerely, Margaret.” same letter from a world where the MoD didnt turn Weinberger down.....

amariani, what unit is that? or is it just some generic USAF Mustangs? mandatory screenie

paratroopers are generally listed as "bombs" so why not create a bomb station on the affected aircraft, then make them SpecificStationCode=Paratrooper, and have the same line on the troopers? then you wont get them popping up where they shouldnt. mind you, i have not dug deep enough into YAPRW to see the issue or check the solution. this is just off the top of my head reading here

149th Tactical Fighter Squadron, Virginia Air National Guard. F-105D to A-7D, 1981 pay no mind how much Richmond VA looks like southern Italy lol

hey, some folks were just talking about that..... mandatory screenie or if it aint rainin we aint trainin

just messing around.....

ya know, that old grungy camo works well over the Balkans...

The C's and D's were pretty much interceptors by then and more likely to be used to defend CONUS than the Fulda Gap. so not so much of a need for countermeasures some D models went to Ramstein at about that timeframe with Montana and North Dakota ANG while the 86th TFW was converting to Vipers. but pretty sure they would have had countermeasures. push come to shove, do in the data.ini what the crew chiefs would have done: jimmy rig something!!!!

well, you seem quite froggy, go ahead an jump on this. we look forward to your work as for the references, theres a hell of a lot more out there than even 5 years ago, let alone 10 years ago (when TK last did major work on SF2 as we mod it). be glad for it and make full use of it

going through some of my older mods. gawd these need reworked

off topic, are you in the Coyote Aerospace group?

i figured the ini dance would be with a pairing of an aircraft and carrier like in Gepard's screenies. im not saying this is super easy to do. to the contrary, it will be difficult, not fit every aircraft or ship, and take a lot of time to do. its possible, but you'd have to really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, want it to go through with it

so it seems possible. but will need ALOT of ini dancing to make practical

Just saw this in another article about a Ukrainian Blackhawk..... https://twitter.com/oleksiireznikov/status/1616858176481017856?ref_src=twsrc^tfw|twcamp^tweetembed|twterm^1616858176481017856|twgr^681a43d8a4f616aad7db88c22727d249fb91d4eb|twcon^s1_c10&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fh5.newsbreakapp.com%2Fmp%2F0kux3f35%3Fcv%3D23.7.0platform%3D1hybrid%3Dtrueversion%3D23.7.0isDark%3D0fontScale%3D1.0isFollow%3D0_native_ads%3D1font_scale%3D1.0

for starters, i would delete all the new aircraft, then add one at a time to see which one was the offending party checking the game between deleting all new birds and adding them singly is advised too. make sure it is one of the aircraft and not some other issue finally, is that part of the drop down truly blank, or just greyed out with text in there and not allowing alternate selections?

no patch since 2013, its pretty damn stable-ish by now. oc course if he were to patch it or make a major new release, everyone would be gaga and amazed he did something for the first 24 hours. then would come all the bitching. THIS ISNT RIGHT! HIS PATCH BROKE MY MOD!!! (not that i remember that back in '11 and '12...) so yeah, best to play with and tweek what we got.

well theres many reasons alot of those folks havent been around. some are still in touch-ish via FB, others have just moved on. and thank you very much for now making me realize that i am now one of the old ones at least on this site

nah, youre in the 15 percent. you like the big booms too much to stay in the shadows

brother, get use to it a large portion of this site is lurkers. very happy to watch and download whatever is out there that suits their tastes. not so big on participation. not saying its good or bad. just an observation. theres maybe 15 percent active in communicating on this site, 5 percent of it involved in any form of content creation. numbers aint exact, but you get the point. best to set question parameters, a time limit and go with hte results at the end. people that will bitch, will do it whether you had 66 votes or 66,000.

i thought it was going to be FACs when i saw the title. looks wicked, but kept thinking "toot, toot!" as i was lookin at them